Supreme Court approves warrantless data seizures by police

Post a reply

:
In an effort to prevent automatic submissions, we require that you enter both of the words displayed into the text field underneath.
Smilies
:pray: :sleep: :D :alien51: :) :mrgreen: :wink: :love: :obsessed: :| :( :twisted: :evil: :scary: :o :dunno: :? 8-) :hmmm: :shock: :flop: :top: :x :P :oops: :cry: :?: :idea: :arrow: :!: :nails: :look: :rtft: :roll: :ohno: :hell: :vomit: :lol: :think: :headscratch: :clapper: :bang; :censored: :badair: :help: :owned: :nope: :nwo: :geek: :ugeek: :robot: :alien: :mrcool: :ghost: :sunny: :peep: :yell: :banana: :dancing: :hugging: :bullshit: :cheers: :shooting: :hiho:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is OFF
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Supreme Court approves warrantless data seizures by police

Re: Supreme Court approves warrantless data seizures by poli

Post by Funnyman46 » Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:53 pm

NBC morning news just said the texting part is due to go to the Supreme Court for decisions

Re: Supreme Court approves warrantless data seizures by poli

Post by Whiteknight2000 » Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:35 pm

hmmmmm

Warrentless data seisures hah?

Read the article guys. Do you know what that means?

It means they won't need a warrant to tap your phones, and collect data from your mobile phones and wireless devices. Data that could be easily stolen by hackers and such.

They have been doing this thing for news.

However if they changed the law's about no longer needing warrants to go into your house thats a different story. I would be concerned.

Re: Supreme Court approves warrantless data seizures by poli

Post by Illuminated » Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:28 pm

-

WOW thats really in your face :shock:

comments below article are good..

Re: Supreme Court approves warrantless data seizures by poli

Post by Seahawk » Tue Jan 04, 2011 7:59 pm

"An Orwellian state is now technologically feasible."

That, is one f***ed up fact.

Supreme Court approves warrantless data seizures by police

Post by Postmodernmonk » Tue Jan 04, 2011 7:32 pm

"The majority thus sanctions a highly intrusive and unjustified type of search, one meeting neither the warrant requirement nor the reasonableness requirement of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution," Werdegar continued. "As a commentator has noted, '[i]f courts adopted this rule, it would subject anyone who is the subject of a custodial arrest, even for a traffic violation, to a preapproved foray into a virtual warehouse of their most intimate communications and photographs without probable cause.'"

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/01/cali ... es-police/

Top

Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook