Powerful & Disturbing Child Abuse in 2013

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 245
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 12:35 am

PostSat Dec 07, 2013 11:40 pm » by missamandamanhattan


With regard to Maloggs posts - So there are now legal applications to permit the removal of a baby directly from the womb of the mother - yet - a paedophile with millions of paedophile pornographic images can continue his repugnant behaviour until someone decides to arrest him.

The paradigm in which we live is starting to collapse. I am providing some links to articles on Marc Dutroux. Be warned they will enrage and upset you - for those who have a conscience and heart. I am attaching them as an educational resource - so that people can learn but more for the political aspect. The actions/inaction of the Police and Parliament - makes me go hmmmmm...

NCF:Dutroux and the Belgium's X-Files
www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oXbkg1YdUQ

Marc Dutroux;The Monster of Belgium (Documentary)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=twcwcR1M8oQ

The Perverted World of Marc Dutroux (2005)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjtlhK4dijAw

I have included the titles - in case I did not get the correct link you can type the title into the search engine to find them. Truly insightful as to how the cabal/illuminati/whatever protect their own.


On a personal note I have recently come into receipt of 310 pages of evidence that I had not seen - and - a lot of it full of complete fabrications as well as libelous and vexatious comments - all to my detriment. This evidence will turn my case around - well - provided the professional agencies I have contacted do something. I also received 87 pages of medical evidence that - to my knowledge - had been 'omitted.' That was because the campaign to have me certified as mentally ill went nowhere.

Who knows what will happen next...

Much Peace - Amanda :peace:

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 8255
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:08 am
Location: Next door

PostWed Dec 11, 2013 2:04 pm » by Malogg


missamandamanhattan wrote:With regard to Maloggs posts - So there are now legal applications to permit the removal of a baby directly from the womb of the mother - yet - a paedophile with millions of paedophile pornographic images can continue his repugnant behaviour until someone decides to arrest him.

The paradigm in which we live is starting to collapse. I am providing some links to articles on Marc Dutroux. Be warned they will enrage and upset you - for those who have a conscience and heart. I am attaching them as an educational resource - so that people can learn but more for the political aspect. The actions/inaction of the Police and Parliament - makes me go hmmmmm...

NCF:Dutroux and the Belgium's X-Files
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oXbkg1YdUQ

Marc Dutroux;The Monster of Belgium (Documentary)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twcwcR1M8oQ

The Perverted World of Marc Dutroux (2005)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjtlhK4dijAw

I have included the titles - in case I did not get the correct link you can type the title into the search engine to find them. Truly insightful as to how the cabal/illuminati/whatever protect their own.


On a personal note I have recently come into receipt of 310 pages of evidence that I had not seen - and - a lot of it full of complete fabrications as well as libelous and vexatious comments - all to my detriment. This evidence will turn my case around - well - provided the professional agencies I have contacted do something. I also received 87 pages of medical evidence that - to my knowledge - had been 'omitted.' That was because the campaign to have me certified as mentally ill went nowhere.

Who knows what will happen next...

Much Peace - Amanda :peace:


Cheers Amanda have a wee look at this it is down your neck of the woods

Children of horrifying incest 'cult' with four generations of in-breeding found living deformed, filthy and mute in scenic valley

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... alley.html

:cheers:
One down donkey Kenny next to go !!

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 245
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 12:35 am

PostThu Dec 12, 2013 2:08 am » by missamandamanhattan


Malogg - I read the article you posted about the incestuous four generation family. I read with disgust and was reviled and at the same time I felt sad, so sad for the Children.

The questions I have relate to Social Security - particularly when the family moved from state to state. Surely someone somewhere could see by the government administration paperwork who these people were and that they were related and that Children of school age were not attending school??? Think about all the paperwork needed to gain access to government benefits - apparently they lived without electricity etcetera but had money to buy things from a shop??? And did the article quote that they purchased a newspaper??? I thought they were all illiterate????

Very interesting article but I have some questions I need answered. The photograph of the Police at a residence -looks more like the corner of a house than a caravan or a ramshackle residence as depicted in the earlier photograph.


The photograph that is utilised at the end of the article is of a place in the Blue Mountains called (ironically) The Three Sisters - whether that is a sick joke (in reference to the three sisters cited within the article) by the journalist & editor - I don't know.


If this is a factual article how did this family of people become isolated from the rest of society? And consider that question with regard to how technology keeps people from all parts of the planet connected to just about every other part of the planet????


Thanks for posting - sure has stimulated my thinking. Did you see the front pages of the Australian newspapers - The Daily Telegraph & the Sydney Morning Herald on Tuesday 10th Dec 2013 - the curent Australian Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse is in action - complete with a priest who had a cult of four children at a school - with one he made pregnant.

The truth is fizzing up to the surface ...finally we can see some justice for Children who have had their childhoods destroyed and who have carried an untenable burden for the rest of their lives. I applaud their courage in coming forward and partaking of a cold and unforgiving court system - they are true heroes.

Much Peace...and may it come sooner rather than later....


NB Back to my legal preparation for Thursday 19th December 2013 - my first of three legal battles!!

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 8255
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:08 am
Location: Next door

PostSat Dec 14, 2013 4:50 am » by Malogg


US guards 'did nothing' to stop adult prisoners from raping juveniles

Image

Michigan prison officials needlessly housed juvenile inmates with adult convicts, where the guards then ignored allegations that the young inmates were sexually abused and essentially used as currency inside the facility, according to a new lawsuit.

Brought forth by seven unnamed juvenile prisoners, the case hinges on the idea that the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC) has consistently failed to keep prisoners under the age of 18 apart from the more hardened adult inmates. It alleges that at least two of the plaintiffs were repeatedly raped because their older cellmates were selling access to the younger ones. It goes on to implicate corrections officers for allowing the rape to continue.

“MDOC staff was aware of the assaults and aware that male adult prisoners were paying John Doe 5’s cellmate access for access to John Doe 5 for purposes of sexually assaulting him,” the suit claims.

Deborah LeBelle, an attorney based in Ann Arbor, told MLive.com that she was aware of the suit when it was initially filed in October, but decided to bring it back to light because of the seriousness of the allegations. When the suit was re-filed, it was classified as a violation of the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, a Michigan law that forbids differential treatment based on religion, race, color, national origin, age, sex, height, weight, familial status, or marital status.

LeBelle told the Michigan news site she was stunned that teens who may have barely gone through puberty are locked up with adults – which also increases their risk of recidivism.

“I didn’t know the extent of the damage those choices had wrought in Michigan until I started talking to the youth,” she said. “And, I found it heartbreaking…If you put all of these together; I saw it as a tragic waste.”

The class-action suit cites seven plaintiffs, but was filed on behalf of more than 500 others who have been put in dangerous situations because of treatment from staff and inmates. It also accuses the MDOC of violating the Prison Rape Elimination Act by failing to adhere to guidelines that demand prisoners under the age of 18 have no sight, sound, or physical contact with adult prisoners.

At least two prisoners claim they were not only raped by fellow convicts, but also victimized by MDOC staff.

“From late 2012 until early 2013, a female MDOC staff member repeatedly opened John Doe 4’s cell for purposes of engaging in coerced sexual intercourse with him,” the suit claims.

Another has come forward to assert that he was sent to solitary confinement for reporting a staff member who let an older inmate into his cell to rape him.

“Upon his release from solitary confinement, John Doe 2 was physically assaulted again with a knife, resulting in a scar across the face and marking him as a victim and an ongoing target for other prisoners,” the suit claims.

The victims are seeking more than $25,000 in damages. The suit was filed in Washtenaw Trial Court, with the MDOC, various MDOC staff members, and Michigan Governor Rick Snyder named as defendants.

The re-filing comes after the MDOC filed a motion to dismiss an unrelated lawsuit from the union representing corrections officers. Hundreds of guards previously signed onto a suit claiming the MDOC violated state and federal labor laws by refusing to pay corrections officers for time spent before and after each shift, when they made and received reports, inspected equipment, and received new assignments.

http://rt.com/usa/michigan-prison-rape- ... wsuit-163/


........................................................................................


And they wonder why folk call them " FILTH " :hell:

Former police sergeant accused of having indecent images of children

DOZENS of indecent images of children were found on computer equipment seized from a former police sergeant’s home, a court heard.

Grampian Police officer Neil Shand, 51, was detained after forensic officers recovered data from a desktop computer and a pen drive during a raid on his house.

The retired sergeant is alleged to have been in possession of child pornography at his home in Aberchirder between December 2008 and 2010.

He is on trial at Banff Sheriff Court facing two child pornography offences which he denies.

He is accused of being in possession of indecent images and further claimed to have taken photographs or permitted them to have been taken.

Shand, of 28 North Street, Aberchirder, denies the two charges and has lodged special defences of alibi and incrimination.

http://www.eveningexpress.co.uk/news/lo ... n-1.161885
One down donkey Kenny next to go !!

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 8255
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:08 am
Location: Next door

PostSat Dec 14, 2013 5:22 am » by Malogg


60-Year-Old Pedophile Freed From Jail Because 11-Year-Old Victim Is 'In Love'

Do you have a barf bucket handy? Good. You're going to need it. A judge has apparently over-turned a 60-year-old man's conviction for sexually abusing a child. The reason? The 11-year-old victim says she's in love with her abuser!

Have you ever heard of anything so disturbing?

She's 11! He's 60! That's not love. That's abuse. Period!

The man and the young girl were found in bed together, which is how the geriatric ended up in an Italian courtroom. He was originally sentenced to five years in jail, but according to the BBC, that was "annulled" when the court determined what the two have is actually a "romantic relationship."

Forgive me, but I took French in college. Do those words mean something different in Italian or something? In English, "romantic relationship" indicates there's actual love and caring involved.


http://thestir.cafemom.com/in_the_news/ ... _from_jail

:bang;
One down donkey Kenny next to go !!

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 8255
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:08 am
Location: Next door

PostSun Dec 15, 2013 12:14 am » by Malogg



Upload to Disclose.tv



Published on Dec 14, 2013

www.pienmashfilms.com

Apologists for paedophiles: How Labour Deputy Harriet Harman, her shadow minister husband and former Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt were all linked to a group lobbying for the right to have sex with children
1. Magpie magazine distributed in the late Seventies to members of PIE
2. PIE is Paedophile Information Exchange - the name of a far-Left lobby group
3. Called for legalisation of child sex and age of consent to be lowered to four
4. Emerged this week Labour government of the time may helped finance the organisation and The Magpie
5. Home Office now ordered a 'thorough, independent investigation' into claims
6. Hewitt, Harman and husband Dromey encountered the PIE as young officials in the National Council for Civil Liberties
Read the full article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/artic...


Image

Apologists for paedophiles: How Labour Deputy Harriet Harman, her shadow minister husband and former Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt were all linked to a group lobbying for the right to have sex with children

Image
Past: Labour's Harriet Harman, pictured in 1982, when she was cutting her political teeth

At first sight, it might be a harmless parish magazine or the newsletter of a respectable society of bird-watching enthusiasts.

Called The Magpie, the now-yellowing A5-size pamphlet was distributed in the late Seventies to members of an organisation called the PIE. The inside cover carries a workmanlike ‘editor’s letter’ highlighting ‘our third annual AGM, which is to be held in London in the summer’, and inviting readers to seek election to ‘our Executive Committee’.

Page three advertises a memorial service for recently deceased PIE member Alan Doggett, who worked as the conductor of the London Boys’ Choir, and was apparently to be remembered for his ‘friendliness, integrity and loyalty’. There follows a selection of short news stories, a letters page and several long feature articles, which are scholarly in tone and peppered with academic jargon.

But it doesn’t take long for any right-minded person who flicks through The Magpie — dispatched quarterly in plain brown envelopes to up to 1,000 members — to realise that behind its matter-of-fact tone and appearance, something is terribly, terribly, amiss.

For the initials PIE stand for Paedophile Information Exchange. This turns out to be the name of a far-Left lobby group which spent much of the Seventies and early Eighties publicly calling for the legalisation of child sex — and the age of consent to be lowered to four.

Today, PIE has been widely forgotten. But at the time, it achieved prominence for circulating articles by tame psychologists and cod scientists promoting the ‘rights’ of paedophiles.

Take, for example, a long article by Dr Edward Brongersma, a Dutch politician and academic who was renowned for his ultra-liberal views on sexual morality.

‘A sexual relationship between a child and an adult does not harm the child and may be even beneficial,’ he argues, ‘providing that the adult partner is considerate, loving and affectionate.’

Take also an article in which a PIE member called Keith Spence, who had recently moved to Stockholm, writes of his (unsuccessful) efforts to abuse ‘heart-shatteringly beautiful’ children at the local swimming pool.

‘If you think England is frustrating for paedophiles, you should try living in Sweden for a bit,’ he complains.

Towards the back of the journal are adverts for a book called Towards A Better Perspective For Boy-Lovers, and admiring reviews of magazines with names such as Male International, Kim, and Boys Express.

More...

Lord Wife-Beater: The duke's son, his drug-fuelled rages and the blonde divorcee he's moved into his stately home
Police asked to investigate Labour MP Jack Dromey for calling a Royal Mail worker 'the Pikey' on Twitter during Christmas visit

Today, almost 35 years later, the contents of The Magpie seem so vile and amoral, and the activities of a lobby group dedicated to advancing the human rights of predatory paedophiles so disgusting, that it’s incredible either was allowed legally to exist at all.

However, it now seems that the Paedophile Information Exchange wasn’t just tolerated by the liberal authorities of the time. There is growing evidence that the era’s Left-wing establishment saw it as a socially acceptable pressure group and actively encouraged its ugly campaigns and sinister public meetings.

Image
Claims: Patricia Hewitt, former health secretary and former member of the National Council for Civil Liberties

Indeed, it emerged this week that the Labour government of the Seventies may even have helped finance the organisation and its morally bankrupt publication The Magpie.

On Sunday, the Home Office announced that it had ordered a ‘thorough, independent investigation’ into shocking allegations that the Paedophile Information Exchange received public funds while James Callaghan was in Downing Street.

It will examine whether tens of thousands of pounds of taxpayers’ money was funnelled to it via the Voluntary Services Unit [VSU], a department of the Home Office that gave annual grants to charities and non-profit-making lobby groups.

The probe comes after a whistle-blower had claimed the payments were signed off, over several years, by a senior civil servant who worked under Labour’s then Home Secretary, Merlyn Rees.

Dig beneath the surface of this ugly scandal, however, and you will soon discover that Lord Rees — who died in 2006 — is a long way from being the only prominent Labourite whose good name may be tarnished by it.

For it also raises tricky questions for three of the most senior Labour figures of recent times: deputy leader Harriet Harman, former Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt, and shadow housing minister Jack Dromey, a former party treasurer and Harman’s husband.

Turn the clock back to the Seventies and this trio had strangely close links to the Paedophile Information Exchange. And the long-defunct organisation’s sudden return to the news pages may very well bring those links back to haunt them.

Image
Disturbing: Labour Deputy Harriet Harman with her shadow minister husband Jack Dromey

Harman, Hewitt and Dromey first encountered the PIE when they were cutting their political teeth as young officials in the National Council for Civil Liberties [NCCL].

This tub-thumping human rights organisation — these days known as Liberty — was far more radical than its modern equivalent, and was actively forging alliances with a host of ultra-liberal pressure groups.

One such group was the PIE. In 1975, it somehow succeeded in convincing the NCCL to grant it official ‘affiliate’ status.

The move was a signal victory for radical Left-wing activists, who had for years lobbied for more ‘enlightened’ attitudes towards sex between adults and children.

It was also, of course, a PR coup for those who sought to promote paedophilia.

‘The PIE somehow managed to convince feminists and the gay rights lobby that they had shared values and that we all belonged in the same club,’ recalls one feminist writer whose magazine was lobbied for support by the PIE after the Exchange won NCCL affiliation.

‘Anyone who spoke out against them feared being called a “homophobe”, which in Left-wing circles at the time was about the biggest insult anyone could throw at you. So they were invited into the liberal establishment.’

A PIE ‘information’ leaflet published at the time, called Paedophilia: Some Questions And Answers, shows how the organisation had managed to ally its cause to the gay rights movement.

‘Homosexuals are now widely regarded as ordinary, healthy people — a minority, but no more “ill” than the minority who are left-handed,’ it read. ‘There is no reason why paedophilia should not win similar acceptance.’

The NCCL — then under the chairmanship of Henry Hodge, the Left-wing solicitor who would go on to marry Labour MP Margaret Hodge — appears to have bought this argument hook, line and sinker.

‘The PIE was also being picketed by the National Front, so a lot of people also supported them on the basis that our enemy’s enemy had to be our friend,’ says the writer. ‘It seems terrifyingly simplistic now, obviously, but that was the political context.’

Over the ensuing years, the NCCL — which had Hewitt as its General Secretary from 1974-83 — provided valuable support to the paedophile lobby as it pursued a string of legal and political campaigns designed to advance its twisted agenda.

In 1975, for example, the NCCL conference was addressed by the PIE chairman, Keith Hose. Delegates passed a motion declaring that ‘awareness and acceptance of the sexuality of children is an essential part of the liberation of the young homosexual’.

In 1976, with Jack Dromey on its executive (he served from 1970-79), the NCCL filed a submission to a parliamentary committee claiming that a proposed Bill to protect children from sex abusers would lead to ‘damaging and absurd prosecutions’.

‘Childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in, with an adult result in no identifiable damage,’ it read. ‘The real need is a change in the attitude which assumes that all cases of paedophilia result in lasting damage.’

Image
Political: Harriet Harman (centre) and Patricia Hewitt (to her right), at a press conference held by the National Council for Civil Liberties in 1990

The statement might have been cut-and-pasted from the propaganda book of the Paedophile Information Exchange.

Two years later, in 1978, Harriet Harman, then a newly qualified solicitor, became the NCCL’s legal officer. She promptly wrote its official response to Parliament’s Protection of Children Bill, which sought to ban child pornography.

Her letter claimed that such a law would ‘increase censorship’, and argued that a pornographic picture of a naked child should not be considered indecent unless it could be proven that the subject had suffered.

‘Our amendment [to the proposed law] places the onus of proof on the prosecution to show that the child was actually harmed,’ she wrote.

Such statements, from officials in what was (and is) a respected human rights organisation, may go some way towards explaining how the Labour-run Home Office of the era might have allowed public grants to be directed towards the PIE.

The NCCL presided over by Harman, Hewitt, Hodge and Dromey had, after all, helped foster an environment where woolly liberalism trumped child protection.

To many on the Left, promoting the ‘rights’ of paedophiles came to be regarded as a legitimate act of political subversion.

Sources close to the Home Office investigation, which was announced this week, say the whistle-blower who sparked it first came forward in the late Seventies. However, his concerns were ignored by officials working for Labour Home Secretary Merlyn Rees.

Image
Previous roles: Harriet Harman pictured aged 32 with the shadow home Secretary, Mr Roy Hattersley, when she was a solicitor for the National Council for Civil Liberties

I understand that the civil servant suspected of approving the Voluntary Services Unit grants to the Paedophile Information Exchange in the Seventies died in 2006.

Officials are now trying to establish the nature of this man’s relationship with the late Steven Adrian Smith, a former chairman of the Paedophile Information Exchange who was employed as a security guard in the basement of the Home Office during the same era.

If the two men were working in cahoots, it will surely fuel suspicions that an establishment paedophile ring had been allowed to take root in the department.

After all, it emerged earlier this year that Geoffrey Dickens, a Tory MP who campaigned against paedophilia, had approached the then-Home Secretary Leon Brittan in 1983 with allegations concerning widespread abuse of children, some of it by prominent individuals, in children’s care homes.

Nothing appears ever to have come of Dickens’s claims.

As for the Paedophile Information Exchange, its fortunes began to wane in 1981 when secretary Tom O’Carroll — a press officer for the Open University — was jailed for conspiring to corrupt public morals by publishing ‘contact’ advertisements (which put readers in touch with vendors of child porn) in an edition of The Magpie

Image
Apology: Leader of Liberty - formerly the NCCL - Shami Chakrabarti has offered a public apology for the scandal

Even after O’Carroll’s fall from grace, Patricia Hewitt was willing to stick up for the organisation. In a 1982 essay entitled The Police And Civil Liberties, she offered a thundering critique of his trial.

‘Conspiring to corrupt public morals is an offence incapable of definition or precise proof,’ she wrote, arguing that O’Carroll’s involvement in distributing child porn had ‘overshadowed the deplorable nature of the conspiracy charge used by the prosecution’.

But sympathy in the National Council for Civil Liberties for the PIE’s aims was fading. In 1983, its affiliation was formally withdrawn. And the PIE disbanded in 1984.

The ensuing years saw its reputation permanently sunk, following the convictions of dozens of prominent members for child sex offences.

Among them was Charles Napier, its treasurer, who was jailed in 1995 for indecently assaulting a 14-year-old boy.

Also disgraced was Peter Righton, a key government adviser on children’s homes, and a PIE founder, who was fined in 1992 for possessing child porn. He died in 2006, never prosecuted for abusing boys in his care — though he openly admitted doing so.

As for Harman, Hewitt and Dromey, they went on to climb successfully the greasy ladder of politics.

Despite the public revulsion against paedophilia, none of the trio would ever properly apologise for the NCCL’s historic links to the Paedophile Information Exchange.

Indeed, a spokesman for Harman said yesterday that despite her employment by the NCCL during its formal affiliation, ‘the very suggestion that Harriet was in any way supportive of the PIE or its aims is untrue and misleading’.

It has been left to Shami Chakrabarti, the director of Liberty — who, born in 1969, had nothing to do with the affair — to offer the only public apology.

‘It is a source of continuing disgust and horror that even the NCCL had to expel paedophiles from its ranks in 1983 after infiltration at some point in the Seventies,’ she told me yesterday.

‘The most important lesson learned by Liberty over the subsequent 30 years was to become a well-governed modern human rights movement in which protecting the vulnerable, especially children, will always come first.’

With fresh light about to be shed on this dark passage in history, it’s a message that other — perhaps more guilty — parties would be well advised to heed.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... sage-field
One down donkey Kenny next to go !!

Conspirator
Posts: 1682
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:29 pm
Location: canada

PostMon Dec 16, 2013 3:36 am » by Mydogma


Time for the peoples do the Belgian march thing...but instead of 300,000 lets make it millions...time to demand the nsa give us all the emails of these scum...or let me guess...its only us they are monitoring...the more i hear of this shit the more it bugs me....i will grab a sign to jail a few judges....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2Orsim7 ... KWpOllMIv9
If you don't wake up, Your the problem, not the thief...www.cattledum.com

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 245
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 12:35 am

PostMon Dec 16, 2013 7:53 am » by missamandamanhattan


Mydogma - thanks for responding and I like your idea of a march of millions. My first thought was this - how about people march in the streets in a variety of countries on the day I go to the Australian Federal Human Rights Court - where - my intention is to set a precedent to enable the current legislation to be amended and made stronger.

Just a thought - reckon we could make it happen??


Much Peace...

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 245
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 12:35 am

PostMon Dec 16, 2013 12:04 pm » by missamandamanhattan


A quick update for those people who are following my current journey. I enter the first of three legal arenas on Thursday 19th December 2013. It is my WorkCover Hearing which will be a battle about what happened to me in my workplace (an Australian secondary school), immediately after I made a Mandatory Report.

A Mandatory Report is the legal duty of a Teacher to report any information that is relevant to child abuse and if it is detected that a Teacher failed to act - then there are huge fines and a jail term as legal recourse.

I have kept every document over the course of 2011, 2012, 2013 and continuing and there are documents being held by a variety of people in a number of countries around the world - who - will upload those documents to the worldwideweb should I be unable to upload them myself.

I have worked out how people in positions of authority are circumventing the laws that are intended to protect Children and are using them to protect paedophiles and predators instead. I know their secrets and I know their methods of operation.

Thank you to all the people who have sent me positive thoughts and prayers and meditations and shared kind words of support. I appreciate every positive energy that is sent my way. A while ago my spirit was broken but I am back and stronger than I could ever have imagined - I am ready for whatever will be thrown at me.

Much Peace - Amanda :peace: :hugging:

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 8255
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:08 am
Location: Next door

PostMon Dec 16, 2013 2:59 pm » by Malogg


No Irish prosecution for man named as world’s largest child porn kingpin

U.S. seeks to extradite and he would face much longer sentence if convicted

Image
Eric Eoin Marques, believed by the FBI to be the "“largest facilitator of child porn on the planet” leaving court in Dublin.

Irish authorities will not prosecute Eric Eoin Marques, who is wanted on four charges of distributing child pornography. His extradition to the U.S. is sought by the FBI, but it is unclear whether Ireland will hand him over.

Marques has been called the “largest facilitator of child porn on the planet” through hosting sites on the “dark” internet.

Marques is accused of running Freedom Hosting, which uses anonymizing tool Tor, to create dark internet sites. Forums hosted by Freedom Hosting allowed users to anonymously share child pornography.

In November, the 28-year-old dual U.S.-Irish national said he would plead guilty to a series of charges under Irish law. Ireland’s Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), Claire Loftus, has said that she will not bring proceedings against him in Ireland. She has not explained her decision.

Marques, who has no criminal history, would have faced a maximum 14 year sentence, which would be significantly reduced by his early guilty plea, in Ireland. In contrast, he faces a total of 100 years if found guilty in the U.S., according to the FBI. The U.S. sentence is equivalent to four life sentences in Ireland.

In the U.S. each charge is punished by a sentence of between 20 and 30 years and the sentences run consecutively. In Ireland the sentences run concurrently.

Marques’ lawyers are expected to argue that the U.S. sentences for similar charges are too harsh in comparison with Ireland’s. In addition, the Justice Minister can refuse an extradition hearing where the DPP has decided not to bring proceedings against the accused.

The extradition hearing is expected to be held early next year.

Marques was arrested at his Dublin home in August 2013 on four charges of distributing and promoting child pornography. He was denied bail and is considered a “flight risk” by the Irish police and the FBI. In November he appeared before the High Court, which heard that large payments had been transferred to accounts in Romania. His computer’s browser history revealed that he had searched for information on Russian visas.

His arrest coincided with the disappearance of many “hidden services” on the anonymous network Tor. Tor uses an ‘onion’ system to hide its members’ IP addresses from the police, which makes it almost impossible to identity the physical location of the culprit. Tor also protects its users from traffic analysis.

http://www.irishcentral.com/news/No-Iri ... 51201.html


Wonder if this post gets white washed by admin like the last 2 Ima made
:think:
One down donkey Kenny next to go !!


PreviousNext

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook