Post subject: Re: Project Blue Beam projected on to a huge water screen
Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 7:12 am
Initiate
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:32 pm Posts: 306
There's a large difference in projecting an image onto a wall of water at relatively close distances, to making it happen miles away. Nice video, though!
Post subject: Re: Project Blue Beam projected on to a huge water screen
Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 8:18 am
Writer
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:50 am Posts: 52
man this is sick. go japan. ive been to odaiba, i have pics so it did happen. now tell me, if we can do this with a boat and water sprayed in the air, couldn't we do it with 30million dollar satellites on the clouds? prove me wrong. ^_^ ♥
Post subject: Re: Project Blue Beam projected on to a huge water screen
Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 10:21 am
Member
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:45 pm Posts: 4
I don't know this does look pretty real, although we know it's a wall of water, but from the sky, yeah, it could be a totally different story of course. Maybe it's taking so long because they don't have all of the things in place yet to really make it real.. not only logistical, and physical, but psychological and mental as well.. But if they can do this with water and make it look pretty spectacular, imagine what they can do with the sky!
Post subject: Re: Project Blue Beam projected on to a huge water screen
Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 11:40 am
Conspirator
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 2:21 pm Posts: 1330
jetxvii wrote:
This makes me question Ufo Sightings and videos even more now.
now i feel sad
That still doesn't explain crop circles that have no proof of being man made, radar anomalies that are shown to be travelling at 6000mph or more coupled with eyewitness backup, and balls of light like the brown mountain lights or the hessdalen lights.
Some just can't take the possibility of extraterrestrial life within their religious view and explain it away as Demons flying around in metallic saucers or holograms projected by the government. I mean in all honesty, do you think any of the real christians out there that know and follow the teachings of revelations will believe in some new age religious event that claims to discredit their own religion? They're distrustful of anything that they think threatens their religious beliefs as it is, there sure as hell not going to fall for some messiah in the sky saying all that they know is wrong and misunderstood a long with all other religions. That plan is a big failure from the get go.
_________________
FiveFingerDeathPunch wrote:
"I'd rather hate you, for everything you are, than ever love you, for something you are not"
Post subject: Re: Project Blue Beam projected on to a huge water screen
Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 8:32 pm
Initiate
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:32 pm Posts: 306
drabbit wrote:
fast forward to 4:40 on this video . *laughs* I can only imagine how more advanced it is now
I agree that we have the tech to do it. It's just immensely difficult to conceal a light projection system that has to break through atmospheric distortion, and over large distances. Would probably work well on a battlefield, where you can have a system of sorts behind the front lines, but it would be tough to hide such a system (and have it be effective enough) here in the US, for example. No doubts that it's being made more compact and "better" over time, though!
Post subject: Re: Project Blue Beam projected on to a huge water screen
Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 8:48 pm
Initiate
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 12:35 pm Posts: 396
...The UFO technolgy ..as HAARP technology is ..was invented by Nikola Tesla ...prolly had some help from his mentors like Faraday..
Here's a abit taken from 1911 Nikola Tesla interview where he talks about this anti-gravity, "flying saucer" technology ...not alien technology, but human invented Ether Physics technolgy
Check out John Hutchison's (Hutchison effect) videos and info at Youtube..
Here' s one interesting bit this is Ether Physics..
TESLA'S NEW MONARCH OF MACHINES by Nikola Tesla -New York Herald Tribune, Oct. 15, 1911
“..And it makes the aeroplane practical,” I suggested.
“Not the aeroplane, the flying machine,” responded Dr. Tesla. “Now you have struck the point in which I am most deeply interested—the object toward which I have been devoting my energies for more than twenty years—the dream of my life. It was in seeking the means of making the perfect flying machine that I developed this engine. “Twenty years ago I believed that I would be the first man to fly; that I was on the track of accomplishing what no one else was anywhere near reaching. I was working entirely in electricity then and did not realize that the gasoline engine was approaching a perfection that was going to make the aeroplane feasible. There is nothing new about the aeroplane but its engine, you know. “What I was working on twenty years ago was the wireless transmission of electric power. My idea was a flying machine propelled by an electric motor, with power supplied from stations on the earth. I have not accomplished this as yet, but am confident that I will in time. “When I found that I had been anticipated as to the flying machine, by men working in a different field, I began to study the problem from other angles, to regard it as a mechanical rather than an electrical problem. I felt certain there must be some means of obtaining power that was better than any now in use. And by vigorous use of my gray matter for a number of years, I grasped the possibilities of the principle of the viscosity and adhesion of fluids and conceived the mechanism of my engine. Now that I have it, my next step will be the perfect flying machine.”
“An aeroplane driven by your engine?” I asked.
“Not at all,” said Dr. Tesla. “The aeroplane is fatally defective. It is merely a toy—a sporting play-thing. It can never become commercially practical. It has fatal defects. One is the fact that when it encounters a downward current of air it is helpless. The “hole in the air” of which aviators speak is simply a downward current, and unless the aeroplane is high enough above the earth to move laterally but can do nothing but fall. “There is no way of detecting these downward currents, no way of avoiding them, and therefore the aeroplane must always be subject to chance and its operator to the risk of fatal accident. Sportsmen will always take these chances, but as a business proposition the risk is too great.
“The flying machine of the future—my flying machine—will be heavier than air, but it will not be an aeroplane. It will have no wings. It will be substantial, solid, stable. You cannot have a stable airplane. The gyroscope can never be successfully applied to the airplane, for it would give a stability that would result in the machine being torn to pieces by the wind, just as the unprotected aeroplane on the ground is torn to pieces by a high wind. “My flying machine will have neither wings nor propellers. You might see it on the ground and you would never guess that it was a flying machine. Yet it will be able to move at will through the air in any direction with perfect safety, higher speeds than have yet been reached, regardless of weather and oblivious of “holes in the air” or downward currents. It will ascend in such currents if desired. It can remain absolutely stationary in the air, even in a wind, for great length of time. Its lifting power will not depend upon any such delicate devices as the bird has to employ, but upon positive mechanical action.”
“You will get stability through gyroscopes?” I asked.
“Through gyroscopic action of my engine, assisted by some devices I am not yet prepared to talk about,” he replied. “Powerful air currents that may be deflected at will, if produced by engines and compressors sufficiently light and powerful, might lift a heavy body off the ground and propel it through the air,” I ventured, wondering if I had grasped the inventor’s secret. Dr. Tesla smiled an inscrutable smile. “All I have to say on that point is that my airship will have neither gas bag, wings nor propellers,” he said. “It is the child of my dreams, the product of years of intense and painful toil and research. I am not going to talk about it any further. But whatever my airship may be, here at least is an engine that will do things that no other engine ever has done, and that is something tangible.” . .
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum