Putin Vs. the Global Homosexual Juggernaut

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 8895
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 3:24 pm

PostThu Aug 15, 2013 9:28 pm » by *WillEase*


After 14 years of tyrannical behavior, Russia’s strongman appears to have finally incited a vast and genuine moral backlash.

Image

Five years ago this month, Vladimir Putin dispatched Russian troops to Georgia in an invasion that killed 300 people, destabilized the region and set off an international crisis. Throughout his career, Putin has participated in and initiated other unpleasant escapades, including the killing and displacement of more than 150,000 Chechnyans, supporting deadly regimes in Iran and Syria, and violently oppressing opponents in pursuit of personal ambition and power.

In each exploit, Putin has violated human rights and inflicted terrible suffering, even death. How has the West responded? Generally the response has come only from Western governments (and some media voices), and has been one of restrained reproach and halfhearted condemnation. Despite all the misery and instability Putin has caused, there’s never been a significant, wholehearted moral backlash. Never has there been a fiery, genuinely furious reaction from the spectrum of Western leaders and institutions, from governments, the media, intellectuals and businessmen, Hollywood and higher education, and the public.

That is, until now.

Vladimir Putin is currently facing enormous international criticism. Not just from fellow world leaders, including President Obama, who stated last week that “nobody’s more offended than me” by what’s happening in Russia. (Mr. Obama is so upset he called off a scheduled meeting with Putin.) But also from the mainstream media, from intellectuals and popular figures, and even from the public.

Around the world, thousands are turning out at organized protests to vent their fury. Bars, nightclubs and restaurants are joining an international boycott of Russian-made vodka and other Russian-made products. Cities in America and elsewhere are severing relations with “sister” cities in Russia.

Image

In California, Democratic politicians are trying to ensure state funds are not invested in Russia. Last week, the International Olympic Committee received an international petition with 300,000 signatures demanding the boycott of the Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia.


Upload to Disclose.tv



President Putin is being compared to Adolf Hitler and his actions to that of pre-war Nazi Germany. “I’m surprised this is not a huge story,” lamented Jay Leno to President Obama last week. “I mean, this seems like Germany: Let’s round up the Jews; let’s round up the gays; let’s round up the blacks. I mean, it starts with that .… Why is not more of the world outraged at this?” Putin’s actions come “straight from the Nazi playbook,” wrote Harvey Fierstein in the New York Times. In Britain, Stephen Fry likened Putin to Hitler, and wrote that “an absolute ban on the Russian Winter Olympics of 2014 is simply essential.”

After years of tyrannical behavior, it seems Putin has finally incited vast and genuine outrage. What action was so despicable, so atrocious, so morally reprehensible and offensive, that it roused the normally tolerant and imperturbable West?

He signed a law banning the dissemination of homosexual propaganda to minors.

Yes, that’s all. Never mind the years this man has engaged in domestic and international bullying—invading nations, brow-beating others; beating, imprisoning and even murdering opponents; undermining the West and supporting genocidal regimes. It’s when Putin intruded on the right of Russian homosexuals to indoctrinate children that the world flipped.

This is the state of Western morality: Vladimir Putin can tyrannize the world, but the moment he interferes with the right of Russian homosexuals to educate children in their lifestyle, the world screams condemnation!

There’s no denying Russia has a measure of intolerance of homosexuality. In Russia it’s illegal to advocate homosexuality to people under 18, to engage in homosexual behavior with a person under 16, and for homosexual couples to adopt children. But do we seriously believe these laws are the equivalent of Nazi Germany’s pre-war treatment of Jews? As recently as a decade ago you could find similar legislation in Britain and America.

While Putin clearly isn’t a fan of homosexuals, and Russia can be a dangerous place for homosexuals (generally only those who flaunt their sexuality), the man isn’t rounding them up and tossing them in prison. He hasn’t shuttered homosexual bars, or banned homosexual pornography, or made it illegal to practice homosexuality. Russian law does not explicitly ban participation in gay pride parades, or the promotion of lgbt equality online. It’s entirely legal to be homosexual in Russia. All this admittedly vague “anti-gay” law does is make it illegal to propagandize homosexuality to minors.

Homosexual advocates are protesting against Russia in defense of human rights, specifically the right of Russians to freely engage in the homosexual lifestyle. (The violent persecution of homosexuals in Russia, although the problem has been greatly exaggerated, is unfortunate.) But what about the human rights violations occurring daily that are 100 times worse? Where’s the fervent international moral backlash—the global protests, the celebrity outcries, the international boycotts, the cancellation of high-level meetings—in protest of Bashar Assad, or America’s black-on-black violence, or the mistreatment of women by Islamists? In each instance, tens of thousands have suffered horribly and been killed.

The international brouhaha surrounding Russia’s laws governing homosexuality reveals the rapidly growing power and influence of the global lgbt movement and agenda. More significantly, it testifies to the collapsing moral state of the West. The violent persecution of any human being is wrong and it’s unfortunate some homosexuals are suffering in Russia. But let’s be honest. The laws Mr. Putin is creating and the moral standard he seeks to preserve aren’t historically anomalous. (Eighty-five percent of Russian adults strongly oppose homosexual marriage. A large majority oppose homosexuality altogether.) Truth be told, when it comes to homosexuality, Putin is in moral territory that was until quite recently inhabited by America, Britain and virtually the entire world.

Considered against the long history of Western morality, Putin isn’t the anomaly. We are.

August 15, 2013 • From theTrumpet.com
Image

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 15836
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 7:12 pm

PostThu Aug 15, 2013 10:56 pm » by Spock


Collapsing "moral" state. Because bigotry against someone's genetic makeup is less tolerated today than it was 15 years ago.

I'm sure the same mentality felt bruised when blacks were freed and women started to vote.

The only people that believe homosexuality is a lifestyle choice, are the ones that must struggle with it themselves.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2427
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 10:47 am

PostThu Aug 15, 2013 11:33 pm » by Opalserpent


"After years of tyrannical behavior, it seems Putin has finally incited vast and genuine outrage. What action was so despicable, so atrocious, so morally reprehensible and offensive, that it roused the normally tolerant and imperturbable West?"

Putin’s actions come “straight from the Nazi playbook,” wrote Harvey Fierstein. I wonder if he's a dual citizen pushing
the homosexual agenda angle hard to hurt Putin.?


“I mean, this seems like Germany: Let’s round up the Jews; let’s round up the gays; let’s round up the blacks. I mean, it starts with that .… Why is not more of the world outraged at this?”

Because a majority of people think it's unnatural. Because our bible forbids it.

It's okay in a zionist godless enslaved homo society but some of us still have some religion left in us.

Forcing the gay card on Putin is just reinforcing what the rest of the awakened people know,
the zio owned west has no cards left to play in their morals deck.


This sounds very hypocritical to me:

Yes, that’s all. Never mind the years this man has engaged in domestic and international bullying—invading nations, brow-beating others; beating, imprisoning and even murdering opponents; undermining the West and supporting genocidal regimes. It’s when Putin intruded on the right of Russian homosexuals to indoctrinate children that the world flipped.

Something doesn't seem right about that sentence:

It’s when Putin intruded on the right of Russian homosexuals to indoctrinate children that the world flipped.

I didn't flip did you? Can willease please make a vote with did you flip when putin banned gay porn for children?

There is a reason we Australians haven't had a referendum on Gay marriage! Because if would fail

and already has in opinion polls.


Also politicians who call themselves gay and go out getting rent boys or sexually harrassing same sex members of parliament
is providing a banner of protection for a number of assorted deviants that can masquerade as being gay.

Can you see the logic in that statement?

We christians are taught to tolerate not exacerbate and sensationalise stories for political means like stephen fry and the Australian Greens party who show their true colors of where their
support originates from be it the rockefeller foundation or Mr fry enjoying the perks of being
a zio knob gobbler.




Also I find this even more troubling then the previous statements from the above propaganda article:


Five years ago this month, Vladimir Putin dispatched Russian troops to Georgia in an invasion that killed 300 people, destabilized the region and set off an international crisis. Throughout his career, Putin has participated in and initiated other unpleasant escapades, including the killing and displacement of more than 150,000 Chechnyans, supporting deadly regimes in Iran and Syria, and violently oppressing opponents in pursuit of personal ambition and power.

I'm sorry but get your facts right, not you willease, you merely reposted this msm murdoch propaganda,

Russia did not invade Georgia at all, Georgia decided to bomb women and children in the middle of the night

killing 1492.

Russia responded immediately sending troops and artillery to south ossetia, the Georgians the "night bombers"

thought that Nato might back them up but Nato didn't so they scurried off like murdering war criminals.

Check it out, this Australian website has the truth, suck it.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/ru ... 1117264050


Also pointing out how Chechens are being killed by russian forces attacking and terrorising russian cities
is pretty normal when fighting terrorism.
Also I believe Chechnya borders Russia which would make it imperitive to remove the terrorists immediately.

Also I shouldn't bother but can you guess who funds those terrorists in Chechnya? Take a wild crazy
guess.

here is a patsy:

http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/arti ... 44487.html

Check this out, some real history:

http://www.meforum.org/744/how-chechnya ... for-terror


I do believe america has been fighting wars for how long now? And in how many Nations?

How many people have died in Iraq, libya, afghanistan, pakistan, yemen and god knows where else?

millions perhaps. This article was quite disturbing and I am glad I am here to protect the truth.


If you want to be gay thats fine just don't push it on children. :sunny:

I understand the difficult decision of allowing parents to display gay porn to children.
I personally wouldn't but I'm not a parent or hard core gay, metro sexual at best. :peep:

Good old hypocrisy :robot:
Image

Image

Image

Image
Last edited by Opalserpent on Fri Aug 16, 2013 12:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Live by the Terror, Die by the Terror.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1093
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 1:21 pm
Location: "In life's litter tray......"

PostThu Aug 15, 2013 11:36 pm » by Webcat


Spock wrote:Collapsing "moral" state. Because bigotry against someone's genetic makeup is less tolerated today than it was 15 years ago.

I'm sure the same mentality felt bruised when blacks were freed and women started to vote.

The only people that believe homosexuality is a lifestyle choice, are the ones that must struggle with it themselves.



"homosexuality is a lifestyle choice" is quite wrong, you are what you are.

There is very little 'choice' in the matter.

Who you 'love' is your character, it is you.

Male or female, who you 'love' is your choice - in societies eyes - right or wrong.

But its your choice.

And humans are strange and diverse, just like the people they love.

'Love' comes in many colours - like a rainbow - and who are we to judge why someone loves another?

:cheers:
Image

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 15836
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 7:12 pm

PostThu Aug 15, 2013 11:56 pm » by Spock


Indeed WebCat. We can love lots of people of any gender, I'm talking more about who one innately feels right about being intimate with as a companion.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 6551
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:05 pm
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico

PostFri Aug 16, 2013 12:02 am » by Fatdogmendoza


Spock, Webbie :hugging: Now lets talk about the Football :mrgreen: Sorry Spock, I know you dislike the Hugs... :o
Image

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 15836
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 7:12 pm

PostFri Aug 16, 2013 12:05 am » by Spock


NOT A HUGGER!!! What are ya, some kind of faggot?

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2427
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 10:47 am

PostFri Aug 16, 2013 12:14 am » by Opalserpent


Noone is saying being gay is bad but using it as a political weapon is wrong.

Webcat is right, if you love someone of the same sex and they are reciprocating the feeling then
it should be okay for them to get married.

I would put it to a referendum and let the people decide.
Live by the Terror, Die by the Terror.

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 11449
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 12:57 pm
Location: Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin

PostFri Aug 16, 2013 12:18 am » by -Marduk-


Image
______________________________________________________________________________
-= PREDESTINATION: Itz hard to be ze good guy when you turn into a fucking gun =-

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 6551
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:05 pm
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico

PostFri Aug 16, 2013 12:21 am » by Fatdogmendoza


Spock wrote:NOT A HUGGER!!! What are ya, some kind of faggot?


Huh? Who you calling a meatball?

[img]http://www.plattsminipackages.co.uk/product_images/c/847/1135-Mr_Brains_Faggots__24580_zoom.jpg
[/img]
Image

:mrgreen:
Image


Next

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook