Question regarding the Cigar Shaped Craft in China last year

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2519
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:27 pm

PostThu Jul 07, 2011 1:07 am » by Giusdude


lowsix wrote:yes.

Those are all examples of long time exposure photos.
The evidence is how light the foreground is.
If you take a photo with a shutter speed fast enough to
freeze an object in the sky, it will be completely black,

except for the brightest details. Always. Ther eis no camera
with enough light sensitivity to expose the sky at night with any
speed fast enough NOT to leave this telltale shuter drag.

So if there is a light NIGHT time sky, you'll know from now on. Fake.

(These are 4 to 8 second exposures at a minimum)

All of the examples of the Chinese UFOs are some version of that.
Optical Physics. And the long exposure gives it enough time to
make the sky lighter and the foreground detail to appear.

This photo shows the spacing between the flashing lights and the effects of shutter drag from the person keeping the shutter open long enough to expose the sky and blur the details that would normally give clue to its specific shape (airplane and in one case helicopter with search lights)

But alas, no alien ships here..just long exposures and very bright landing lights.

Image



yup,
what he said.
i dont gotz de technologicums ackonowlegements like mr six, so he done splained it all for y'all....
as long as there's one idiot around wlling to believe bullshit, there will be a bullshitter

Master Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 10610
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:11 pm

PostThu Jul 07, 2011 1:12 am » by Cornbread714


Well, dayum, you boys got sum of that goldang book-lernin, aintcha?

Shore looked like sum inteligernt ailing beans craft to me...
Where's the beer and when do I get paid?
- Jimmy Carl Black (the Indian of the group)

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2519
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:27 pm

PostThu Jul 07, 2011 1:37 am » by Giusdude


cornbread714 wrote:Well, dayum, you boys got sum of that goldang book-lernin, aintcha?

Shore looked like sum inteligernt ailing beans craft to me...



no siree, mr six done splained it.
it was a thingamabob of them camera instruments, in them lights in da sky, that done fooled us poor folks.
ain't no interligent animals round yonder, none other than yours truly!
as long as there's one idiot around wlling to believe bullshit, there will be a bullshitter

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 3085
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:35 pm

PostThu Jul 07, 2011 1:48 am » by Poooooot


lowsix wrote:yes.

Those are all examples of long time exposure photos.
The evidence is how light the foreground is.
If you take a photo with a shutter speed fast enough to
freeze an object in the sky, it will be completely black,

except for the brightest details. Always. Ther eis no camera
with enough light sensitivity to expose the sky at night with any
speed fast enough NOT to leave this telltale shuter drag.

So if there is a light NIGHT time sky, you'll know from now on. Fake.

(These are 4 to 8 second exposures at a minimum)

All of the examples of the Chinese UFOs are some version of that.
Optical Physics. And the long exposure gives it enough time to
make the sky lighter and the foreground detail to appear.

This photo shows the spacing between the flashing lights and the effects of shutter drag from the person keeping the shutter open long enough to expose the sky and blur the details that would normally give clue to its specific shape (airplane and in one case helicopter with search lights)

But alas, no alien ships here..just long exposures and very bright landing lights.

Image


Oh wow, very informative. Thank you :)
Matthew 7
“Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.

Master Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 10861
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 12:36 am

PostThu Jul 07, 2011 1:55 am » by Lowsix


and thank you for not calling me an asshole.

:)
Image
warløckmitbladderinfection wrote:blasphemous new gehenna inhabitant makes god sad...

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 3085
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:35 pm

PostThu Jul 07, 2011 3:06 am » by Poooooot


Wait. What about this one?

Image

fake?
Matthew 7
“Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.

Master Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 10861
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 12:36 am

PostThu Jul 07, 2011 3:13 am » by Lowsix


that was the one i was guessing was a helicopter using search lights...
Image
warløckmitbladderinfection wrote:blasphemous new gehenna inhabitant makes god sad...

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 3085
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:35 pm

PostThu Jul 07, 2011 3:21 am » by Poooooot


the light to the end all the way to the right is a far distance. too much for the speed in the middle where the lights are closer. it almost looks pixalated on the far left tip. i think it might be photoshopped. maybe.
Matthew 7
“Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 4742
Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 11:32 pm

PostThu Jul 07, 2011 3:25 am » by Will69ease


UFOs over China? Not quite, analyst says
http://articles.cnn.com/2010-07-20/worl ... s=PM:WORLD
then there was this one from China also July last year...
http://larrykinglive.blogs.cnn.com/2010 ... hina-fake/

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 3085
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:35 pm

PostThu Jul 14, 2011 3:09 pm » by Poooooot


I don't know. I think there might actually be something to this story...

will69ease wrote:UFOs over China? Not quite, analyst says
http://articles.cnn.com/2010-07-20/worl ... s=PM:WORLD
then there was this one from China also July last year...
http://larrykinglive.blogs.cnn.com/2010 ... hina-fake/


And I tend to believe the opposite of what US main stream media says. lol
Matthew 7
“Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.


PreviousNext

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook