Remote ‘kill switch’ added to Intel’s newest processor
- Spreadthetruth

- Posts: 264
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 4:33 pm
You might like:
Lauded as a security feature, Intel’s new Sandy Bridge processor can be remotely disabled by a hardware/software combination known at Anti-Theft 3.0. Systems can be disabled over 3G networks, even while the OS is not running. Even when the hard drive is replaced, the critical systems will still be terminated.
At first this sounds great: if an owner loses a laptop it can be remotely disabled to ensure no sensitive data is compromised. But essentially we are giving up control of our computers and putting that control in another’s hands.
With the Patriot Act in place and and legislation like the........
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/309/832/ ... essor.html
At first this sounds great: if an owner loses a laptop it can be remotely disabled to ensure no sensitive data is compromised. But essentially we are giving up control of our computers and putting that control in another’s hands.
With the Patriot Act in place and and legislation like the........
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/309/832/ ... essor.html
- Mediasorcerer

-
- Posts: 6299
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 4:06 pm
- Location: coast
so who can kill it,the owner,or someone else?
with the power of soul,anything is possible
with the power of you,anything that you wanna do
with the power of you,anything that you wanna do
- Stratafire

-
- Posts: 716
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 7:16 am
NAhh.. I'm not worried about the CPU design..
These engineers are way too confident in their abilities (what else is new right?) .. The designers depend on computers to build computer too much, they had to design an "emulator" for the hardware design to make sure the design concept works with the "software" portion of the concept..
Problem with doing this, is that you "arranged" the hardware design based upon the emulator, which means it's more then likely a ROM chip, so a simple ROM reader to back engineer the code (bit by bit), reassemble it into a "clone" emulator, and you have a duplicated means to screw with someone..
And (BTW) a down and dirty means to get around this, is to "flag" the registry (up or down depending on it's current state) using the one language that all (and I do mean all x86 architecture based cpu's) which is "Hexadecimal"..
Just move the pointer to the stack in memory within the CPU logic controller to "bypass" this feature (doing this in the outsourced memory is speculative, since it's stacking is more random and volatile)..
Not worried about it, more concerned with the "failing" in the mentality of the current engineers we seem to be cranking out nowadays)
These engineers are way too confident in their abilities (what else is new right?) .. The designers depend on computers to build computer too much, they had to design an "emulator" for the hardware design to make sure the design concept works with the "software" portion of the concept..
Problem with doing this, is that you "arranged" the hardware design based upon the emulator, which means it's more then likely a ROM chip, so a simple ROM reader to back engineer the code (bit by bit), reassemble it into a "clone" emulator, and you have a duplicated means to screw with someone..
And (BTW) a down and dirty means to get around this, is to "flag" the registry (up or down depending on it's current state) using the one language that all (and I do mean all x86 architecture based cpu's) which is "Hexadecimal"..
Just move the pointer to the stack in memory within the CPU logic controller to "bypass" this feature (doing this in the outsourced memory is speculative, since it's stacking is more random and volatile)..
Not worried about it, more concerned with the "failing" in the mentality of the current engineers we seem to be cranking out nowadays)
-
- Related topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- Web Inventor Denies Kill-Switch
by Fatdogmendoza » Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:59 am - 0 Replies
- 310 Views
- Last post by Fatdogmendoza

Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:59 am
- Web Inventor Denies Kill-Switch
-
- Internet 'kill switch' bill reintroduced
by agarta » Sat Feb 05, 2011 10:24 pm - 1 Replies
- 246 Views
- Last post by agarta

Sat Feb 05, 2011 10:33 pm
- Internet 'kill switch' bill reintroduced
-
- Kill Switch:FBI Could Shut Off Internet for Thousands on 3/8
by rydher » Fri Feb 17, 2012 2:28 pm - 6 Replies
- 1099 Views
- Last post by frutty

Tue Feb 21, 2012 4:27 am
- Kill Switch:FBI Could Shut Off Internet for Thousands on 3/8
-
- US-based Israeli company sold internet kill-switch to Egypt
by reinaul » Fri Feb 04, 2011 7:42 am - 0 Replies
- 233 Views
- Last post by reinaul

Fri Feb 04, 2011 7:42 am
- US-based Israeli company sold internet kill-switch to Egypt
-
- VeriSign Demands Power To Kill “Abusive” Websites
by kinninigan » Tue Oct 11, 2011 3:58 pm - 1 Replies
- 150 Views
- Last post by boondox681

Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:10 pm
- VeriSign Demands Power To Kill “Abusive” Websites


