REPTILIAN EVIDENCE From Spanish Cnn

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 637
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 9:15 pm

You might like:

PostWed Dec 15, 2010 2:47 am » by Michaelssiebert


boondox681 wrote:seriously..that neck thing fuckin' freaked me out.
and not just one glitch,that chick had a lot going on with her ugly face.

thanx


Because her hair is stuck to her neck...???

Boon bro, seriously......

EDIT: and because she needs to go and see a dentist..??

Boon, sigh....
Last edited by Michaelssiebert on Wed Dec 15, 2010 2:48 am, edited 1 time in total.

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 798
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 5:03 pm

PostWed Dec 15, 2010 2:47 am » by Oxygen


OK and I have to admit that I never wrapped my small mind around that there is a Spanish CNN and/or Spanish reptilians? WTF? lmaoooo...... OK and I am a little stoned.

FK me ok? My wife bought me 4 pounds Jamaican Blue Mountain Coffee (expensive very good shit btw) and nothing goes better with a cup of that shiznit than a doobie (also good shiz of course).

lmfao....

Peace
Last edited by Oxygen on Wed Dec 15, 2010 2:50 am, edited 1 time in total.

Writer
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:40 pm

PostWed Dec 15, 2010 2:49 am » by Starsandstripes


Yeah...But seriously folks, her neck looks that way because some of her hair is draped across her neck mixed with the resolution. Not to say I don't believe reptilians don't exist. :hmmm:

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 7778
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 9:09 pm

PostWed Dec 15, 2010 2:50 am » by Mob 2,0


hair is stuck to her neck :headscratch: :headscratch:
Image
There is no greater victory than to fall from this world a free man

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 7778
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 9:09 pm

PostWed Dec 15, 2010 2:52 am » by Mob 2,0


one the left maybe but not one the right side

check it again
Last edited by Mob 2,0 on Wed Dec 15, 2010 2:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
There is no greater victory than to fall from this world a free man

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 798
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 5:03 pm

PostWed Dec 15, 2010 2:52 am » by Oxygen


demobe wrote:hair is stuck to her neck :headscratch: :headscratch:


What's your point? That Spanish reptilian women shouldn't get their (obviously fake) hair stuck to their neck?

I keed...

Peace

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 637
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 9:15 pm

PostWed Dec 15, 2010 2:54 am » by Michaelssiebert


C'mon guys.... Suggestion is one thing, but stupidity is another....

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 716
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 7:16 am

PostWed Dec 15, 2010 2:55 am » by Stratafire


Come on people.. this did not crop up until the "HD" digital revolution happened to the broadcasters..

The lighting is from two sides of the studio room, even portable reflectors are used in off site interviews (some look like umbrellas ), and the advent of "lossy compression" of the content before transmission..

The compression formats "lose details" when they rebroadcast it to the general population, even more detail is lost depending on the TV station one is associated with for their cable providing (they tend to further compress the signal, which loses even more quality of the video)

The compression schemes use the "most common bit" preservation techniques when they lose information before broadcasting, that means the "most common" light in the eyes, is the reflection from the light coming from both sides of the room, "ergo" your seeing an emphases on the reflected light in the eyes, and a lesser in the details of the pupil (since in the monochromatic range, the pupil is near the dark range, which causes the compression scheme to omit it)

It is adjustable "on the fly", however it seems they really are not concerned about it. The signal in the studio even goes through a streaming process of removing facial "Artifacts" before broadcasting (those videos floating around with the "melting face syndrome, due to too much or too little tweaking of the settings by the video engineer) .. the processors of the first generation were somewhat "unreliable" as they would not be able to catch up to the streaming needs, and the bandwidth requirements are "HUGE", as well as the data mining and data buffering elements, all to make it a "real time" streaming process..

Ever wonder why your cable bill is still pretty much unchanged? :alien51:
Last edited by Stratafire on Wed Dec 15, 2010 2:57 am, edited 1 time in total.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 7420
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:24 pm

PostWed Dec 15, 2010 2:56 am » by Pindz


demobe wrote: uploaded it on dtv :flop:

:flop: ..... seriously, that bi*%# scared me almost :cry: :)

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 637
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 9:15 pm

PostWed Dec 15, 2010 2:57 am » by Michaelssiebert


stratafire wrote:Come on people.. this did not crop up until the "HD" digital revolution happened to the broadcasters..

The lighting is from two sides of the studio room, even portable reflectors are used in off site interviews (some look like umbrellas ), and the advent of "lossy compression" of the content before transmission..

The compression formats "lose details" when they rebroadcast it to the general population, even more detail is lost depending on the TV station one is associated with for their cable providing (they tend to further compress the signal, which loses even more quality of the video)

The compression schemes use the "most common bit" preservation techniques when they lose information before broadcasting, that means the "most common" light in the eyes, is the reflection from the light coming from both sides of room, "ergo" your seeing an emphases on the reflected light in the eyes, and a lesser in the details of the pupil (since in the monochromatic range, the pupil is near the dark range, which causes the compression scheme to omit it)

It is adjustable "on the fly", however it seems they really are not concerned about it. The signal in the studio even goes through a streaming process of removing facial "Artifacts" before broadcasting (those videos floating around with the "melting face syndrome, due to too much or too little tweaking of the settings by the video engineer) .. the processors of the first generation were somewhat "unreliable" as they would not be able to catch up to the streaming needs, and the bandwidth requirements are "HUGE", as well as the data mining and data buffering elements, all to make it a "real time" streaming process..

Ever wonder why your cable bill is still pretty much unchanged? :alien51:


I don't know why, but I like you.. Finally someone who speaks my language... :cheers:

PreviousNext
  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post