Right wing has history of rewriting history

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 235
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 7:46 pm

PostTue Apr 24, 2012 11:45 pm » by Haansolo


Its simple really,if you don`t like it and can`t counter,just rewrite it to suit you,worked for the nazis! :mrgreen:


Upload to Disclose.tv

"Traveling through hyperspace ain't like dusting crops, boy!

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 383
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:43 am

PostWed Apr 25, 2012 1:01 am » by Stevestv65


Media these days can assasinate anyones character,they have the editorial control to print the news as they see fit,it will always be like that unless its free speech for all its a path you are being led down by the puppet masters that controll things!
The internet was the last hope for freedom of speech but even here its modded to hell before the rest of us get to see it! :vomit:
love the site by the way,no one here is like that really! :peep:
The line must be drawn here! This far, no farther!

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2317
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:16 am

PostWed Apr 25, 2012 1:40 am » by mediasorcery


looks like texas is fighting back dont it?
the story of life is quicker than the blink of an eye, the story of love is hello and goodbye, until we meet again my friend.

Conspirator
Posts: 2312
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:34 pm

PostWed Apr 25, 2012 2:16 am » by Cia212


No history is being rewritten here. How is calling a man by his full name right wing rewriting? Would saying Ronald Wilson Reagan be left wing rewriting? Or quoting Jefferson Davis rewriting anything? Are you saying that Jefferson Davis didn't say the things that are in the textbook? Have you read it to know?

Even the slave trade was, in fact, a triangular trade - this is well documented...still no rewriting.

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 383
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:43 am

PostWed Apr 25, 2012 12:03 pm » by Stevestv65


Cia212 wrote:No history is being rewritten here. How is calling a man by his full name right wing rewriting? Would saying Ronald Wilson Reagan be left wing rewriting? Or quoting Jefferson Davis rewriting anything? Are you saying that Jefferson Davis didn't say the things that are in the textbook? Have you read it to know?

Even the slave trade was, in fact, a triangular trade - this is well documented...still no rewriting.

omg,wake up people,or maybe it will happen to you !
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Jew


Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me.

Martin Niemöller
:hiho:
The line must be drawn here! This far, no farther!

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2737
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 10:47 am

PostWed Apr 25, 2012 12:09 pm » by Opalserpent


Cia212 wrote:No history is being rewritten here. How is calling a man by his full name right wing rewriting? Would saying Ronald Wilson Reagan be left wing rewriting? Or quoting Jefferson Davis rewriting anything? Are you saying that Jefferson Davis didn't say the things that are in the textbook? Have you read it to know?

Even the slave trade was, in fact, a triangular trade - this is well documented...still no rewriting.



Theres one part of history thats been rewritten, perhaps you would like to look at the wiki entry for the U.S.S. Liberty incident and tell me if thats how it really happened. :look:
Live by the Terror, Die by the Terror.

Conspirator
Posts: 2312
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:34 pm

PostWed Apr 25, 2012 12:34 pm » by Cia212


Opalserpent wrote:
Cia212 wrote:No history is being rewritten here. How is calling a man by his full name right wing rewriting? Would saying Ronald Wilson Reagan be left wing rewriting? Or quoting Jefferson Davis rewriting anything? Are you saying that Jefferson Davis didn't say the things that are in the textbook? Have you read it to know?

Even the slave trade was, in fact, a triangular trade - this is well documented...still no rewriting.



Theres one part of history thats been rewritten, perhaps you would like to look at the wiki entry for the U.S.S. Liberty incident and tell me if thats how it really happened. :look:

That's not referenced in this story. History gets rewritten all the time, usually as new facts are uncovered - but this thread is about a specific incident wherein TX is making changes to history books. The changes are presented as rewriting history, but they aren't. The texts merely include more information. ..ex. a full name, wider view of slavery, comments from historical figures.

As a further example, if the text suggested that slavery never existed, that would be rewriting. But that is not the case here.

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 383
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:43 am

PostWed Apr 25, 2012 12:40 pm » by Stevestv65


Cia212 wrote:
Opalserpent wrote:
Cia212 wrote:No history is being rewritten here. How is calling a man by his full name right wing rewriting? Would saying Ronald Wilson Reagan be left wing rewriting? Or quoting Jefferson Davis rewriting anything? Are you saying that Jefferson Davis didn't say the things that are in the textbook? Have you read it to know?

Even the slave trade was, in fact, a triangular trade - this is well documented...still no rewriting.



Theres one part of history thats been rewritten, perhaps you would like to look at the wiki entry for the U.S.S. Liberty incident and tell me if thats how it really happened. :look:

That's not referenced in this story. History gets rewritten all the time, usually as new facts are uncovered - but this thread is about a specific incident wherein TX is making changes to history books. The changes are presented as rewriting history, but they aren't. The texts merely include more information. ..ex. a full name, wider view of slavery, comments from historical figures.

As a further example, if the text suggested that slavery never existed, that would be rewriting. But that is not the case here.

You are trying to see things your way and make us believe that this is not just an example of how history is rewritten,haan is using the texas video to make a point that people like you will always try and force your perspective on others even if it means you have to lie and write history to suit our weird selfish needs,fucker!
The line must be drawn here! This far, no farther!

Conspirator
Posts: 2312
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:34 pm

PostWed Apr 25, 2012 12:50 pm » by Cia212


Stevestv65 wrote:You are trying to see things your way and make us believe that this is not just an example of how history is rewritten,haan is using the texas video to make a point that people like you will always try and force your perspective on others even if it means you have to lie and write history to suit our weird selfish needs,fucker!

No, I'm simply saying that, if facts are not being rewritten, then rewriting isn't occurring. Rewriting, as it's understood in this context, is changing facts (or adding fabrications present as facts).

Writing that the president is Jewish is rewriting. Referring to the president by his full name isn't.

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 235
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 7:46 pm

PostWed Apr 25, 2012 12:56 pm » by Haansolo


the point is that rewriting history is what i thought disclose tv is trying to expose by disclosing/exposing the things that the rewriter's have tried to hide,but yet even here people are doing it,its a conspiracy by the powers that be to hide the facts about things they would rather you didnt know sheeple! :hiho:
"Traveling through hyperspace ain't like dusting crops, boy!


Next

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook