Robert Green thrown in jail for 1 year/HOLLIE GREIG

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 8533
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:52 pm

PostMon Dec 10, 2012 2:43 am » by Noentry


HollieGreigHoaxGroup wrote:
Noentry wrote:
Noentry wrote:You know the accused personally?
Are you mates? Family?


Any answer HollieGreigHoaxGroup ?


Just on-line friends


If you are just online friends.
How can you vouch for them? With no doubt.
You dont even know them personally.
You haven't even met them in person!
You were obviously not around when this happened. Is this true?



Can you say even tho you have never meet the accused(just online friends) or were around when it was happening that you have no doubts? seriously!
"The third-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the majority.
The second-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the minority.
The first-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking."
A. A. Milne

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 8042
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:08 am
Location: Next door

PostMon Dec 10, 2012 2:48 am » by Malogg


HollieGreigHoaxGroup wrote:
Malogg wrote:The fact you are here trolling says it all Dufas


So do you have any evidence or not?


YES and you would be the last person I would pass info onto to be honest . :!:
Every clown has a name eh what is yours?...

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 111
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:23 pm

PostMon Dec 10, 2012 2:53 am » by TruthPrevails


[quote="Noentry

If you are just online friends.
How can you vouch for them? With no doubt.
You dont even know them personally.
You haven't even met them in person!
You were obviously not around when this happened. Is this true?



Can you say even tho you have never meet the accused(just online friends) or were around when it was happening that you have no doubts? seriously![/quote]

Thousands of people believed they abused Hollie Greig without a shred of proof or evidence and have never met them either.
No one should have to prove they are innocent.




Upload to Disclose.tv


Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 8533
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:52 pm

PostMon Dec 10, 2012 2:55 am » by Noentry


HollieGreigHoaxGroup wrote:
Thousands of people believed they abused Hollie Greig without a shred of proof or evidence and have never met them either.


I am not asking them I am asking you.
They are not on here trying to make a case.
No doubts, really you have no doubts?
Last edited by Noentry on Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:02 am, edited 3 times in total.
"The third-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the majority.
The second-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the minority.
The first-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking."
A. A. Milne

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 4961
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 2:36 pm

PostMon Dec 10, 2012 2:56 am » by Tuor10


HollieGreigHoaxGroup wrote:No Green was convicted of breach of the peace which was as a result of him sending letters or dropping them into the neighbours of the people he accused of being child abusers and murderers. The 19 could not do anything until he printed his accusations on paper.


"One only found out she had been accused after Green put letters through doors around Ferryhill"


He had already put their names on paper when he allegedly put their names through the doors of their neighbours. Why would the police wait until he disseminated the material in public in the form of leaflets?
As far as I am aware, putting malicious material about an individual through the doors of their neighbours constitutes harassment, which is a criminal offence.


"Regarding going down the legal route. Do you know how much money it would cost to bring them to court and what would be the point? Green was convicted in a court already and got a year in jail for his crime"


If someone accused me of such a heinous crime, I would be sure to explore all legal avenues in an effort to clear my name, and press for some form of compensation.


"The law as things stand are clear, in a civilized society one does not have to prove you are innocent."


That says a lot.
I'm sure most who abuse the said laws of the land abide by such mantra.

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 111
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:23 pm

PostMon Dec 10, 2012 3:03 am » by TruthPrevails


Noentry wrote:
HollieGreigHoaxGroup wrote:
Thousands of people believed they abused Hollie Greig without a shred of proof or evidence and have never met them either.


I am not asking them I am asking you.
They are not on here trying to make a case.
No doubt?


I really have no doubts at all. I was not around when it first started and only got involved in the last couple of years and realised that not all was what it was cracked up to be. Then switched from sitting on the fence to being on the other side.
No one should have to prove they are innocent.




Upload to Disclose.tv


Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 111
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:23 pm

PostMon Dec 10, 2012 3:10 am » by TruthPrevails


Tuor10 wrote:Why would the police wait until he disseminated the material in public in the form of leaflets?


But he was banned form going to Aberdeen when he arrived back there he was arrested

Tuor10 wrote:As far as I am aware, putting malicious material about an individual through the doors of their neighbours constitutes harassment, which is a criminal offence.


Which in Scotland is classed as Breach of the peace

Tuor10 wrote:If someone accused me of such a heinous crime, I would be sure to explore all legal avenues in an effort to clear my name, and press for some form of compensation.


They have explored legal avenues and there will be no joy from that avenue except financial ruin. I don't understand why you suggest they need to clear their names, they are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Tuor10 wrote:That says a lot.
I'm sure most who abuse the said laws of the land abide by such mantra.


I don't know of any better way to do things.
No one should have to prove they are innocent.




Upload to Disclose.tv


Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 8042
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:08 am
Location: Next door

PostMon Dec 10, 2012 3:16 am » by Malogg


HollieGreigHoaxGroup wrote:
Tuor10 wrote:Why would the police wait until he disseminated the material in public in the form of leaflets?


But he was banned form going to Aberdeen when he arrived back there he was arrested WRONG

Tuor10 wrote:As far as I am aware, putting malicious material about an individual through the doors of their neighbours constitutes harassment, which is a criminal offence.


Which in Scotland is classed as Breach of the peace CORRECT

Tuor10 wrote:If someone accused me of such a heinous crime, I would be sure to explore all legal avenues in an effort to clear my name, and press for some form of compensation.


They have explored legal avenues and there will be no joy from that avenue except financial ruin. I don't understand why you suggest they need to clear their names, they are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. N/A

Tuor10 wrote:That says a lot.
I'm sure most who abuse the said laws of the land abide by such mantra.


I don't know of any better way to do things. N/A
Every clown has a name eh what is yours?...

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 5774
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:24 pm
Location: Wankerville

PostMon Dec 10, 2012 3:26 am » by Evildweeb


.



Nice tag team Mal :flop:

probably going back for reinforcements.....lol



Image







Image
Image
.
"What a pity if he logged into a porn channel we could see him for the wanker he is." - Toxic32

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 9092
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 7:03 pm
Location: Inside You.

PostMon Dec 10, 2012 3:30 am » by Troll2rocks


The repetitive threads relating to the same subject need to stop people. I understand the passion you people have for the subject.

Please contain these threads within a topic already created. Unless the revelatory nature of said topic warrants its own thread.

I am not trying to step on toes, lets keep the grim in the related threads, and not create extra threads relating to the same subject. Unless it is warrants its own thread.

I would also kindly ask for topic titles relating to this subject to be tastefully chosen unless 100% backed by documented evidence. (IE Exposed - Paedophile - and Persons Name Attached)

These inflammatory titles have the possibility to land the writer in trouble unless substantiated by provable and documented evidence, as it could be considered slanderous character assassination. Especially if the allegations are of a highly serious nature.

This does not mean that information and opinions are not welcome here and can not be presented, far from it. Just think about the context and manner in which it is written, it is important for such claims on said subject to be carefully presented and classed as personal opinion until proven under law.


Happy Christmas everyone :?


Image


NOTE. This post was not directed at any individual in particular so please no offence intended to those who are very passionate about this subject.
Image
Censorship debunking & disinformation, it's all in a days work.


PreviousNext

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook