Rockefellers Binary Biological Weapon
The link below contains a report compiled way back in 1942 for the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research by Frederick B Bang MD. The subject of the study was SYNERGISTIC ACTION OF HEMOPHILUS INFLUENZAE SUIS AND THE SWINE INFLUENZA VIRUS ON THE CHICK EMBRYO.
Basically the intention was to study the effect of using two separate agents, one virus and one bacteria, to act together as an infection. On their own these agents have only a very mild effect on the patient, if any at all. However, when the two agents were used together they have a much more serious and much more fatal effect on the patient. The viral agent used in this study was Swine Influenza. This study summized that when the two were acting together they would quickly destroy the lungs. Please read the text of the report and the summary
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article ... /pdf/7.pdf
This link is from the following Rockefeller University Press website
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2135289/
Now the WHO has said after 3 weeks holding back that the virus A/H1N1 has NOT changed SIGNIFICANTLY from the original virus. However now the virus sequences have been finally quietly released onto the GISAID online medical database website, after being held back, they show that the protein number 225 has changed in EXACTLY the same way as the 1918 Spanish flu. Now seriously, what are the chances of a NOVEL flu that has never been seen before, mutating into the EXTINCT Spanish flu ? I will tell you…. NONE
http://platform.gisaid.org/dante-cms/li ... e?aid=1131
Now what are we to believe?
We have a flu that has somehow changed into Spanish flu causing cytokine storms in healthy patients. How did this happen?
We have aeroplanes spraying the affected areas before the new infection suddenly and spectacularly breaks out. What were they spraying?
Finally we have a study carried out 67 years ago that established how to create a binary weapon that can be activated by adding a suis bacteria to a swine flu virus. We also have admissions from US research establishments (UC Berkley) that they received military research grants to produce a binary biological weapon.
We also know that the Spanish flu virus was back engineered from the Spanish flu victim exhumed in 1997?
Let me join the dots for you
There are a number of options.
1 The Novel A/H1N1 naturally mutated into the 1918 virus? Extremely unlikely.
2 The aeroplanes sprayed a new Spanish flu virus? Unlikely as the virus needs a host.
3 The H1N1 vaccine contained the Spanish flu? Unlikely as the flu vaccine was not widely available and the spread was too spectacular.
4 The aeroplanes sprayed a bacteria that will survive in the air, that when breathed in reacts with the swine flu virus administered in the vaccines. The resultant infection becoming much more infectious, hence the spectacular sudden spread. Also causing the bleeding out of the lungs in weaker immune systems. Very possible
5 As above but affecting those who have also caught the virus naturally, hence the lack of availability of vaccines. Unknown if this virus remains dormant in people who have had it.
From studying the history of this whole affair there is a definite hot trail here. A 1942 binary infection report for Rockefeller. A 1997 back engineering of the Spanish flu. Military funding for new binary weapons. A seemingly lab manufactured swine flu outbreak with no attempt to control it’s spread. Aerial spraying of populations followed by spectacular spread of new cytokine storm inducing infection. WHO advising that travel need not be curtailed.. I will leave you to decide what you think is really going on here
Basically the intention was to study the effect of using two separate agents, one virus and one bacteria, to act together as an infection. On their own these agents have only a very mild effect on the patient, if any at all. However, when the two agents were used together they have a much more serious and much more fatal effect on the patient. The viral agent used in this study was Swine Influenza. This study summized that when the two were acting together they would quickly destroy the lungs. Please read the text of the report and the summary
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article ... /pdf/7.pdf
This link is from the following Rockefeller University Press website
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2135289/
Now the WHO has said after 3 weeks holding back that the virus A/H1N1 has NOT changed SIGNIFICANTLY from the original virus. However now the virus sequences have been finally quietly released onto the GISAID online medical database website, after being held back, they show that the protein number 225 has changed in EXACTLY the same way as the 1918 Spanish flu. Now seriously, what are the chances of a NOVEL flu that has never been seen before, mutating into the EXTINCT Spanish flu ? I will tell you…. NONE
http://platform.gisaid.org/dante-cms/li ... e?aid=1131
Now what are we to believe?
We have a flu that has somehow changed into Spanish flu causing cytokine storms in healthy patients. How did this happen?
We have aeroplanes spraying the affected areas before the new infection suddenly and spectacularly breaks out. What were they spraying?
Finally we have a study carried out 67 years ago that established how to create a binary weapon that can be activated by adding a suis bacteria to a swine flu virus. We also have admissions from US research establishments (UC Berkley) that they received military research grants to produce a binary biological weapon.
We also know that the Spanish flu virus was back engineered from the Spanish flu victim exhumed in 1997?
Let me join the dots for you
There are a number of options.
1 The Novel A/H1N1 naturally mutated into the 1918 virus? Extremely unlikely.
2 The aeroplanes sprayed a new Spanish flu virus? Unlikely as the virus needs a host.
3 The H1N1 vaccine contained the Spanish flu? Unlikely as the flu vaccine was not widely available and the spread was too spectacular.
4 The aeroplanes sprayed a bacteria that will survive in the air, that when breathed in reacts with the swine flu virus administered in the vaccines. The resultant infection becoming much more infectious, hence the spectacular sudden spread. Also causing the bleeding out of the lungs in weaker immune systems. Very possible
5 As above but affecting those who have also caught the virus naturally, hence the lack of availability of vaccines. Unknown if this virus remains dormant in people who have had it.
From studying the history of this whole affair there is a definite hot trail here. A 1942 binary infection report for Rockefeller. A 1997 back engineering of the Spanish flu. Military funding for new binary weapons. A seemingly lab manufactured swine flu outbreak with no attempt to control it’s spread. Aerial spraying of populations followed by spectacular spread of new cytokine storm inducing infection. WHO advising that travel need not be curtailed.. I will leave you to decide what you think is really going on here
- mediasorcery

-
- Posts: 1518
- Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:16 am
good post buddy, no surprise here tho, they are a wicked clan, who would do this to humanity?? oh, we know who dont we.
keep it up pal, kudos 2 u.
keep it up pal, kudos 2 u.
the story of life is quicker than the blink of an eye, the story of love is hello and goodbye, until we meet again my friend.
You got dat right buddy.
.....and here's the actual Rothschild AND Rockefeller binary code:
$$ $$$$ $$$$ $$$$ $$$$ $$$$ $$ $$$$ $$ $$$$ $$$$ $$ $$$$ $$ $$$$
It obviously doesn't follow the same construct as digital decimal code, it's an entirely different language.

.....and here's the actual Rothschild AND Rockefeller binary code:
$$ $$$$ $$$$ $$$$ $$$$ $$$$ $$ $$$$ $$ $$$$ $$$$ $$ $$$$ $$ $$$$
It obviously doesn't follow the same construct as digital decimal code, it's an entirely different language.

.

.
Its better to have 50% of something than 100% of nothing. - Caesar Romero, Ocean's 11, 1960
.
.

.
Its better to have 50% of something than 100% of nothing. - Caesar Romero, Ocean's 11, 1960
.
.
- mykingdomforthetruth

- Posts: 400
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 12:08 pm
Ww3 coupled with biological weapons and a full on global economic collapse all at once what better way to kill 6 billion people and get away with it.
-
- Related topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- The Phobos - Grunt Conspiracy: Is It A Biological Weapon?
by thruster » Sun Nov 13, 2011 9:23 pm - 3 Replies
- 617 Views
- Last post by loaded

Wed Nov 23, 2011 4:52 pm
- The Phobos - Grunt Conspiracy: Is It A Biological Weapon?
-
- Non lethal weapon, heart attack gun, noise weapon
by yzlrobin » Sat Aug 13, 2011 5:31 am - 0 Replies
- 170 Views
- Last post by yzlrobin

Sat Aug 13, 2011 5:31 am
- Non lethal weapon, heart attack gun, noise weapon
-
- Say Goodbye to the Rothschilds & Rockefellers - Latest News
by demobe » Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:12 pm - 4 Replies
- 947 Views
- Last post by hansom

Fri Jan 01, 2010 6:35 pm
- Say Goodbye to the Rothschilds & Rockefellers - Latest News
-
- Israel, Eugenics, Rockefellers, Kissinger. jones, chapman
by illuminated » Thu Dec 30, 2010 11:20 am - 1 Replies
- 297 Views
- Last post by mediasorcerer

Thu Dec 30, 2010 1:42 pm
- Israel, Eugenics, Rockefellers, Kissinger. jones, chapman
-
- Chemtrails & Binary Weaponisation
by eyes4eire » Sun Jan 16, 2011 11:11 pm - 0 Replies
- 133 Views
- Last post by eyes4eire

Sun Jan 16, 2011 11:11 pm
- Chemtrails & Binary Weaponisation


