Ron Paul Flip Flops on iran NUKES

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 908
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 10:51 pm

PostThu Dec 29, 2011 1:08 pm » by Abdul14


first clip he says why wouldnt iran want nukes, they are surrounded by nukes its only natural they would want tham too


Upload to Disclose.tv



second clip he completely deny they even want or working to get nukes


Upload to Disclose.tv



and you gotta love how he didnt hear nothing didnt see nothing about the newsletters that was published with his signeture all over tham for years
all of a sudden the dude became an ostrich
When you buy halal products, you are financing inhumaely slaughter and torture of animals

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 4959
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 8:45 pm

PostThu Dec 29, 2011 1:29 pm » by Phaeton


Get a fucking job, you laughable zionist shill wannabe. :flop:
"Those who danced were thought to be quite insane by those who could not hear the music"
"All our science measured against reality, is primitive and childlike - yet, in contemporary consensus, its the most precious thing we have"


Upload to Disclose.tv


Writer
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:00 am

PostThu Dec 29, 2011 1:40 pm » by Theauthority


phaeton wrote:Get a fucking job, you laughable zionist shill wannabe. :flop:



very well said! :shooting:

what a complete joke, so out of context. their desperate to stop him, but America, and the worlds victory is inevitable.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 4007
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 9:03 pm

PostThu Dec 29, 2011 1:48 pm » by Rydher


What's even more humorous is how the truthers here say Ron Paul is on board with their theory that 9/11 was an inside job, that we planted explosives inside the towers and I guess shot a missile at the pentagon, then shot down the 3rd plane for no apparent reason. Since the government was behind it anyway.

But he constantly uses US intelligence agencies and UN reports as a source for his information about Iran. It never ceases to amaze me the level of cherry picking of information from sources that the majority here claim are totally corrupt. Yet their intel is as good as gold when the information coming from them supports their own agendas and fantasies. :lol:

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 4007
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 9:03 pm

PostThu Dec 29, 2011 1:54 pm » by Rydher


theauthority wrote:what a complete joke, so out of context.


Could you put it into context for us then? So we can all better understand it.

Writer
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:00 am

PostThu Dec 29, 2011 2:17 pm » by Theauthority


rydher wrote:What's even more humorous is how the truthers here say Ron Paul is on board with their theory that 9/11 was an inside job, that we planted explosives inside the towers and I guess shot a missile at the pentagon, then shot down the 3rd plane for no apparent reason. Since the government was behind it anyway.

But he constantly uses US intelligence agencies and UN reports as a source for his information about Iran. It never ceases to amaze me the level of cherry picking of information from sources that the majority here claim are totally corrupt. Yet their intel is as good as gold when the information coming from them supports their own agendas and fantasies. :lol:




No but he said "he doesn't trust anything the governments does with investigations." and would be onboard with another investigation. I mean that's all the people really want isnt it? And a legit investigations team. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=d91a13Yr3oQ#t=34s)

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 4007
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 9:03 pm

PostThu Dec 29, 2011 2:28 pm » by Rydher


Like any outcome other than the government blew up the towers would be accepted as the truth. I'm more interested to hear your in context explanation though.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 5297
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:59 am

PostThu Dec 29, 2011 2:36 pm » by Constabul


There have been complacency by the government before. In acts that allowed for the government to take a stance beyond non interference.
Mainly I can think of Pearl Harbor.
While I am not in agreement that the government carried it out. I do think there are evidences that it was known about, and likely another setup to drawl us into a conflict in the middle east.

Another example would be the USS liberty.

But this is not really the subject of the post.

Just adding my 2 cents worth :think:
Image
Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 4007
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 9:03 pm

PostThu Dec 29, 2011 2:42 pm » by Rydher


constabul wrote:While I am not in agreement that the government carried it out. I do think there are evidences that it was known about, and likely another setup to drawl us into a conflict in the middle east.


That is my stance on it as well, 100%. So, he's on board with another government investigation on the subject but "doesn't trust anything the government does with investigations." :headscratch: That just illustrates my point of the prevailing mindset of the vast majority of posters here. Don't trust anything unless it produces information that supports what you think. Constabul is right, let's get back on track.

I'll await your explanation of Ron Pauls statements, in context.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 6298
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 4:06 pm
Location: coast

PostThu Dec 29, 2011 2:51 pm » by Mediasorcerer


you dont want an explanation ryder, you wouldnt listen anyway, just as you state that people here only listen to what they want to hear, your a shining example of that yourself,
and thats why you made that statement,

because its a reflection of your subconscious mind, its your guilt,

of course you dont like ron paul, hes not a hater like you.
hes consistent and honest, two traits you dont have.
with the power of soul,anything is possible
with the power of you,anything that you wanna do


Next

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook