Russia Builds First Floating Nuclear Plant - June 2011

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 340
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 5:24 pm

PostThu Jun 23, 2011 5:31 am » by Fracturedpsyche



Upload to Disclose.tv



Hurricane Earl... and Floating Nuclear Power Plants
But David Lochbaum, senior safety engineer at Washington-based Union of Concerned Scientists-and nuclear experts in Europe including Russia-are highly critical. Lochbaum describes an accident at a floating nuclear power plant as "worse" than at a land-based one. "In a meltdown, a China syndrome accident, the molten mass of what had been the core would burrow into the ground and some of the radioactive material held there. But with a floating nuclear plant, all the molten mass would drop into the water and there would be a steam explosion and the release of a tremendous amount of energy and radioactive material," he explains. "It would be like a bomb going off." A large plume of radioactive poisons would form and "many more people would be put in harm's way," says Mr. Lochbaum, for 18 years an engineer in the nuclear industry and an instructor for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/09/02-2

Image
Image
The earth is what we all have in common ~ Wendell Berry

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 6298
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 4:06 pm
Location: coast

PostThu Jun 23, 2011 6:01 am » by Mediasorcerer


ooooh,i cant wait!!!! now they can fuk the oceans and the land,great,good one russia???
with the power of soul,anything is possible
with the power of you,anything that you wanna do

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 4204
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 2:30 pm

PostThu Jun 23, 2011 6:20 am » by Aragajag


Its like the are saying wtf is it going to take to piss everyone off to the point of violence these days.
Image
'Gee, I wish we had one of them Doomsday Machines, Stainsey..' General "Buck" Turgidson

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 6298
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 4:06 pm
Location: coast

PostThu Jun 23, 2011 6:35 am » by Mediasorcerer


or its a great place to have an acccident,depop agenda?
call me paranoid, hey jag,hows q land these days? shitty rainy down here in vic,cold too,freezin.
with the power of soul,anything is possible
with the power of you,anything that you wanna do

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 541
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 6:00 am
Location: I am not really sure where I am.

PostThu Jun 23, 2011 6:39 am » by Keniwaki


What do u call CVN/ super carrier of USN??
Floating city with it's own nuclear power plant.
So many of nuclear subs are in our oceans
, some are lost.
[b]FUCK GOLDMAN SUCKS and VATICAN[/b]

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 4204
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 2:30 pm

PostThu Jun 23, 2011 7:00 am » by Aragajag


mediasorcerer wrote:or its a great place to have an acccident,depop agenda?
call me paranoid, hey jag,hows q land these days? shitty rainy down here in vic,cold too,freezin.


Really good where I am days are sunny and around the low 20's. I dont know how you blokes live down there freezing in winter and 45c in summer.
Image
'Gee, I wish we had one of them Doomsday Machines, Stainsey..' General "Buck" Turgidson

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2788
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:39 pm
Location: Oceanic 815

PostThu Jun 23, 2011 9:01 am » by Epicfailure


keniwaki wrote:What do u call CVN/ super carrier of USN??
Floating city with it's own nuclear power plant.
So many of nuclear subs are in our oceans
, some are lost.



very true, we do have lost submarines, also ones with active nuclear warheads still equipped on them.
Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1005
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:00 pm
Location: UK

PostThu Jun 23, 2011 9:37 am » by Endless16


epicfailure wrote:
keniwaki wrote:What do u call CVN/ super carrier of USN??
Floating city with it's own nuclear power plant.
So many of nuclear subs are in our oceans
, some are lost.



very true, we do have lost submarines, also ones with active nuclear warheads still equipped on them.


Scary thought... :nails:

I wish we'd stop picking the nuclear option because it's cost effective... because in terms of safety, it's not the best option... I'd rather have an ungodly amount of expensive and inefficient wind turbines covering the landscape that won't make my hair, teeth and skin drop off, personally... :vomit:
"Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel."

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 3852
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 5:01 pm

PostThu Jun 23, 2011 9:39 am » by Zegtelzegtel


Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 4204
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 2:30 pm

PostThu Jun 23, 2011 10:23 am » by Aragajag


Maybe it would be ok when we had the tech to laser any effected area out of the ground and could antigrav it up and out to throw it at the sun but why would you need nuclear energy then.
Image
'Gee, I wish we had one of them Doomsday Machines, Stainsey..' General "Buck" Turgidson



  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook