Scientists Find Asteroids Are Missing, and Possibly Why

[Inhdi Profile]

Scientists Find Asteroids Are Missing, and Possibly Why

(PhysOrg.com) -- The patterns of missing asteroids are like the footprints of wandering giant planets preserved in the asteroid belt.

University of Arizona scientists have uncovered a curious case of missing asteroids.

The main asteroid belt is a zone containing millions of rocky objects between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter. The scientists find that there ought to be more asteroids there than researchers observe. The missing asteroids may be evidence of an event that took place about 4 billion years ago, when the solar system's giant planets migrated to their present locations.

UA planetary sciences graduate student David A. Minton and UA planetary sciences professor Renu Malhotra say missing asteroids is an important piece of evidence to support an idea that the early solar system underwent a violent episode of giant planet migration that might possibly be responsible for a heavy asteroidal bombardment of the inner planets.

Read on: http://www.physorg.com/news154802620.html

[Scuba21 Profile]

ummm, if I recall correctly, the absence of said belt is predicted in electrical cosmology, and its presence it predicted only when gravity is seen as the only controlling force in space.
This just seems to be another nail in the coffin that is gravitational cosmology. If your still interested (not everybody enjoys theoretical physics I find) just google "thunderbolts of the gods" for an awesome documentary that will go a long way in explaining all of this.

[Inhdi Profile]

...
"thunderbolts of the gods" for an awesome documentary that will go a long way in explaining all of this.

Interesting!

According to the hyperdimenional physics model, angular momentum may hold the key!

...Because mainstream physicists are working with Heaviside's incomplete version of Maxwell's original concepts, the most significant ''force'' they can observe is gravity. Since gravity is driven by mass, modern physics has assumed that mass is the single most influential aspect of astrophysical interactions.
However, when we measure total solar system angular momentum, we get something of a surprise...
Jupiter as it turns out, which has less than 1% of the mass of the solar system, somehow possesses 60% of the angular momentum, whereas the sun, which possesses 99% of the mass, has only 1% of the angular momentum. If the conventional view of the solar system is correct, then in fact the distribution of angular momentum to mass should be roughly equivalent. Instead, it is completely flip-flopped.

Hoagland, R.C. & Bara, M. Dark Mission - The Secret History of NASA. p.41
*italics are mine.