September Clues......Was 9/11 news footage faked?

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2360
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:43 pm

PostMon May 03, 2010 6:10 pm » by Electrobadgr


I want to say straight off that i have always regarded the theories that state there were no planes used on 9/11 as disinfo bullshit designed to detract credibility from the very real causes for concern raised by the 9/11 truth movement and others. I was recently on a work visit to london and made friends with a cabbie who had a "9/11 was an Inside Job " sticker in his cab, we got chatting and he gave me a couple of 9/11 dvds, this was on one of them:


Upload to Disclose.tv



Upload to Disclose.tv



Upload to Disclose.tv



Upload to Disclose.tv



Upload to Disclose.tv



Upload to Disclose.tv



Upload to Disclose.tv



Upload to Disclose.tv



All these videos do is reexamine the footage shown on the day, and to be fair there is much reason for suspect trickery.....
-The 15 missing frames immediately after impact
-The fact that all the major witnesses were news corporation staff
-The fact that all the "amateur" footage was all shot by audio/visual industry specialists.
-The glitch across ALL networks at exactly 17 seconds before the second impact
-The same womans scream heard in 3 seperate videos from 3 completely different locations.
-The inconsistencies in lighting on the "planes"

The list really does go on and these videos do really present a strong case for reexamination of the footage, i know what you are all thinking, it is exactly what i thought, "We all saw fucking planes, don't be ridiculous!!" Honestly, now i am not so sure.......

Think these videos have been debunked at some point, will have a look and post here shortly. What do you think though folks? do we know what we saw that day?.... :peep:
"People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but *actually* from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint - it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly. time-y wimey... stuff." - The Doctor

Writer
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 6:29 pm

PostMon May 03, 2010 6:32 pm » by Benincincy


If there were no planes that crashed then were are all the people that boarded those planes at? So you are telling me that the families that are in mourning shouldn't because their loved ones really didnt die in those planes? Think about it. I'm all about it being a conspiracy, but when people say that there were no planes used that's beyond conspiracy, that's being idiotic.

Writer
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 6:29 pm

PostMon May 03, 2010 6:37 pm » by Benincincy


Also... I have family members in New York that saw the second plane crash in person. Let me guess, they must work the government.. no wait... the WHOLE city of New York is under government control and they were all made to tell everyone that they were planes or else. Think about what you say before you post things like this. It's one thing to be a conspiracy theorist, and it's another to be a crackpot. I have been reading these forums and never really felt the need to post anything on here except for this post. It's a disgrace to those families and to NYC to say there we NO planes involved. It's just stupidity.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2360
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:43 pm

PostMon May 03, 2010 6:38 pm » by Electrobadgr


benincincy wrote:If there were no planes that crashed then were are all the people that boarded those planes at? So you are telling me that the families that are in mourning shouldn't because their loved ones really didnt die in those planes? Think about it. I'm all about it being a conspiracy, but when people say that there were no planes used that's beyond conspiracy, that's being idiotic.



Dude, i wholeheartedly agree but i don't claim to know anything solid about what happened on that day. All we have in terms of video evidence is the News corporation footage and the limited amateur footage. Now if the integrity of either is called into questioned then i believe it should be looked at, we already know that it is unlikely a plane was involved in the pentagon attack or at shanksville, just look again at the footage of the tower planes and report back, i don't claim to know anything, i am just open to all possibilities......as should we all be.
"People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but *actually* from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint - it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly. time-y wimey... stuff." - The Doctor

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2360
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:43 pm

PostMon May 03, 2010 6:41 pm » by Electrobadgr


benincincy wrote:Also... I have family members in New York that saw the second plane crash in person. Let me guess, they must work the government.. no wait... the WHOLE city of New York is under government control and they were all made to tell everyone that they were planes or else. Think about what you say before you post things like this. It's one thing to be a conspiracy theorist, and it's another to be a crackpot. I have been reading these forums and never really felt the need to post anything on here except for this post. It's a disgrace to those families and to NYC to say there we NO planes involved. It's just stupidity.



That is exactly the kind of knee jerk reaction i expected when i posted this thread. People so sure they know what they saw, i was sure too, i have not been sure of anything in a long time, my mind is open to all possibilities. I hardly think discussing alternate theories is an insult to anyone, other than maybe your ego which is so sure it is right about everything. Many people reported seeing planes, many others said they were not sure, many others said they saw a missile. Are they insulting the dead too? i think not
"People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but *actually* from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint - it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly. time-y wimey... stuff." - The Doctor

Writer
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 6:29 pm

PostMon May 03, 2010 6:48 pm » by Benincincy


Where are the people that boarded those planes? Tell me. Where.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2360
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:43 pm

PostMon May 03, 2010 6:52 pm » by Electrobadgr


benincincy wrote:Where are the people that boarded those planes? Tell me. Where.



Didn't say i had all the answers mate, quite the opposite in fact. I think you need to do some investigating of your own. All i am saying is that the news footage need re-examined, i bet you haven't even watched the videos i posted, too busy on your little crusade to stiffle pertanent discussion.
"People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but *actually* from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint - it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly. time-y wimey... stuff." - The Doctor

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2360
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:43 pm

PostMon May 03, 2010 6:56 pm » by Electrobadgr


The Debunk video


Upload to Disclose.tv



Still watching.....
"People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but *actually* from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint - it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly. time-y wimey... stuff." - The Doctor

Writer
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 6:29 pm

PostMon May 03, 2010 7:05 pm » by Benincincy


I have my post removed. You kids on here are a joke. Nutjobs.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2360
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:43 pm

PostTue May 04, 2010 10:50 am » by Electrobadgr


benincincy wrote:I have my post removed. You kids on here are a joke. Nutjobs.


Erm....Do you have problems counting? you have made 4 posts, all of them in this thread, no-ones deleted your post!! You have completely proved my point for me though, you have provided exactly the response i expected, so thankyou for being so delightfully predictable.

As i have already said, i don't claim to have all the answers, the only way we can eliminate certain possibilities is through discussion and analysis, something you seem fundamentally opposed to through somekind of misguided loyalty to a certain part of the offical story. Personally, all i saw on that day was all on TV, the whole thing was like a really bad movie, and if you were to truly ask yourself if it was possible that all the Networks could have faked aspects of the coverage that day then the answer would have to be a resounding "Yes!!" of course they could have, but did they?

I am not saying that they did, i am not saying that there were no planes, that is what this video is saying, but is there valid reason for thinking that? that is for you to decide, i think there is a lot of questions to be answered before i am sure of anything that happened that day. I am not arrogant enough to claim i know anything but will analyse any and all theories untill they have been suitably debunked, something which you failed to do, you just chip in with your pointless comments, without analysis of the material or even a valid opinion and start attacking me for attempting to provoke discussion, then you fuck off when you realise you have fuck all to say, run along little boy, you have much to learn.

BTW, We may be "Nutjobs" here, maybe you should fuck off to facecock or twatter and share your witless musings with the feckless cum shedders who want to listen.
"People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but *actually* from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint - it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly. time-y wimey... stuff." - The Doctor


Next

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook