Solid Proof Of Explosion At The Corner Of The WTC

Initiate
Posts: 293
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:39 pm

You might like:

PostSun Nov 21, 2010 8:30 pm » by Tehunit


epicfailure wrote:
zinzana wrote:wow someone's got a very thick skull on here lol
i just expalined that thermite is not an option coz if would have collapsed the tower in like 3-4 minuts max
coz it cuts through steel like butter
and theres no way a thermite would burn for 100 minuts its just not possible


do you not realize that thermite can be started with a detonation device?

but yes you are correct, that thermite that was used was burning for 100 minutes for sure and there is no other way it could have been activated....

:roll:


Was just going to post something along the lines of what you posted here! :)

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1887
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 2:29 pm

PostSun Nov 21, 2010 8:45 pm » by zinzana


epicfailure wrote:
zinzana wrote:Steel melts at 2750 degrees. Jet fuel burns at 1400 degrees. aluminum melts at 1218 degrees
if anything melted its aluminum



but yet a whole building melted at the same time, that was made out of reinforced and fireproofed steel with a sprinkler system.......

you are dense.


reinforced and fireproofed steel with a sprinkler system ?
is it proofed against a very powerfull xplosion of a boing full of fuel
i think not...infact i beilieve that most of the stuff that was sprinkled on the steel probably went poof

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 293
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:26 am

PostSun Nov 21, 2010 9:05 pm » by Boundlessearth


This is pathetic, unlike the majority of America I was awake at the time of the event, My Mom was in NY and I had gotten up early and decided to camp around the TV before work, something I did not always due. That morning I watched flipping between stations a vast number of inconsistent reporting, not just from the confusion but in all attempt to filet society into fear & submission. I knew as I went from network to network that a spin had been spun and the web was now cast on our eyes, ears & throat. I watched with horror and heard with my ears multiple explosions emanating from the base, and then the nail on the coffin, vertical views as it fell with the pop, pop, popping noise anyone familiar with demolition could easily recognize, accompanied by their tale-tell poofs timed in perfect cadence. Lastly, the horror that morning kicked in full gear when I saw at least three times where the story was 'switched' in spite of direct evidence viewed not more than two minutes before, I mean WTF!!! Lastly, those videos witch were mostly live feeds, were not just missing after the fact but had been purposefully and willfully destroyed and oppressed. How can anyone who has been alive for more than twenty years who has half a brain except the given theory, I MEAN SERIOUSLY, did you not see the video of the buildling recently burning for 6-8 hours in China, which DID not fall, or the one in Germany a few years back that burned for days if I recall, DO YOU Really think there was enough office furniture in there to bring down the bottom 9/10 of that building comprised of solid steel. Remember the WTC bombing before, hardly put a dent in that thing. It's kinda like the same folks who accept the WMD thing now, they ejaculate with reports of Chemical agents now discovered in Irag, I mean come on.. we knew they had some of those things since the 80's when they used on Iran, and guess who sold it to him. Oh, and my friend just said don't forget WTC7, she said you know they got that policy double for insurance and I said yeah but that was the gravy, do you know what was in those buildings, evidence that would have unravelled this wide open, records & more records. :bang; :banana:
Shall we again? We shall again!

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2798
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:39 pm
Location: Oceanic 815

PostSun Nov 21, 2010 9:41 pm » by Epicfailure


zinzana wrote:reinforced and fireproofed steel with a sprinkler system ?
is it proofed against a very powerfull xplosion of a boing full of fuel
i think not...infact i beilieve that most of the stuff that was sprinkled on the steel probably went poof


well if those sprinkler systems and fire proofing went poof, where did it go? it could melt fire proofing beyond the highest temperatures and sprinklers, but yet somehow carbon based lifeforms known as humans were still alive, moving and hanging out windows and not melted in those very same floors where the explosion took place and fires that melted steel (but not humans) took place as well.

the fireproofing in all the floors were suddenly gone, and the sprinkler systems even though taken off and possibly wrecked would still leak water especially during a fire which it is activated to go on when smoke or higher temperatures reach the sensor, and for a fire burning through multiple floors on the top of the building, we are to believe that the "WHOLE" building even the very bottom suffered from a loss of sprinklers and fireproofing....

yep mystery solved, did you write to the NIST or the NTSB about that? they might want your input you know, you could get some of that 9/11 emergency fund money they have been hording for your discoveries.
Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1887
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 2:29 pm

PostSun Nov 21, 2010 10:35 pm » by zinzana


epicfailure wrote:
zinzana wrote:reinforced and fireproofed steel with a sprinkler system ?
is it proofed against a very powerfull xplosion of a boing full of fuel
i think not...infact i beilieve that most of the stuff that was sprinkled on the steel probably went poof


well if those sprinkler systems and fire proofing went poof, where did it go? it could melt fire proofing beyond the highest temperatures and sprinklers, but yet somehow carbon based lifeforms known as humans were still alive, moving and hanging out windows and not melted in those very same floors where the explosion took place and fires that melted steel (but not humans) took place as well.

a 30 yr old spray-on fireproofing ...i guess it didnt hold up very good and dislodged by the impact of the aircraft and the huge explotion ...as for the humans that survived i guess they were lucky just like the guys who survived the 100 storyes that crashed on their head and made it out without a scratch

Initiate
Posts: 503
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 2:09 pm

PostSun Nov 21, 2010 10:49 pm » by Cognoscenti


Because the fragmets of nanothermite were propelled so fast and with such force that they did not reach ignition temperature or have sufficient oxygen to combutst. You might as well ask why the black coals in your fireplace have not burned to gray ash like the bulk of the wood did.

Conspirator
Posts: 1082
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:34 pm

PostSun Nov 21, 2010 11:20 pm » by Cia212


zinzana wrote:and how am i suppose to know how much hotter? was i there taking temp samples?
all i know is those are the facts Steel melts at 2750 degrees. Jet fuel burns at 1400 degrees. aluminum melts at 1218 degrees
you do the math what melted

Jet fuel is capable of reaching 1400 under perfect conditions inside a jet engine, but the open air burning temperature is much lower. 287.5 °C (549.5 °F) - sourced from Wiki. Jet fuel can't account for the molten metal - aluminum or otherwise.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1887
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 2:29 pm

PostSun Nov 21, 2010 11:55 pm » by zinzana


Image

yup thats excatly what open air means

Image

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 3645
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 2:30 pm

PostMon Nov 22, 2010 1:33 am » by Aragajag


On the subject of fire protection systems, there is a huge tank of water at the top of high rise buildings. The sprinkler systems are activated by heat which bend the metal star shape to open the flow. No electricity is needed just heat. They work very well but would not put out the initial fire ball.

Image

Image

I have worked on many high rise buildings as part of the crane crew and cannot see how those planes could bring down those massive structures of steel and concrete. The lift cores are immense in size and the steel content is most of it. The outside walls are big enough as it is but dont compare to the core structure for strength. If you could see what I have seen in the building of them you would know without a doubt the planes alone did not bring them down.
We have been having trouble with the email system, but we believe it has been resolved. If you are still having trouble with your email, please email the help desk.


I'm glad I'm not judgmental like all you smug, superficial idiots.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 6314
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 4:06 pm
Location: coast

PostMon Nov 22, 2010 1:40 am » by Mediasorcerer


its all the same,there is no good or reasonable explanation for it,thats because there isnt one,we know its very dodgy,some just cant accept that the official story is crap,but soon they will have too,no point debating when ears are closed,the buildings were demoed,simple as thatw,how is debatable,could be thermite,could be mini nuke,or other sophisticated means,but the fact is they were demoed,like building 7,now the question is,who did it,?we know roughly why,the q is who.
with the power of soul,anything is possible
with the power of you,anything that you wanna do

Previous
  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

We are listed at the www.topparanormalsites.com website. Click here to vote for us.. Thank you :-)