Square the circle.

Mon Feb 25, 2013 12:58 am » by **Webcat**

Life is a circle. We are born, we die, we are born, we die, etc.

The ancients were right, the space/time collective continues on.

Humans are the energy which drives our part of reality. But we think in squares, pyramids, the box.

We see time as a line, birth, life and death.

The square existance - but what if that line was circular?

Our view of life is controlled by our version of time.

We appear to be a single entity within a chaos of existance.

What if we are chaos - singular and creative - our own universe within the expression of "I"?

The world apparently ends with our 'death' - but what if it only just begins?

The circle is a circle - not a square.

:cheers:

Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:09 am » by **Perry LaGuardia**

Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:23 am » by **Edgar 2.0**

"Make of the man and woman a Circle, of that a Quadrangle, of this a Triangle, of the same a Circle and you will have the Stone of the Philosophers"

Kircher. The last man who knew Everything

Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:37 am » by **Webcat**

A great man - who saw that light was darkness, to those that didn't understand, "the horizon of eternity"
a line drawn for those with eyes to see, circles for those who saw squares.

Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:39 am » by **Iamthatiam**

Edgar 2.0 wrote:Kircher. The last man who knew Everything

Doesn't that bother you the present collective unconscious so departed from more 'consistent' informations?

Kircher had a huge heads up, my friend...Renaissance's pinacle of collective ideas. Today's knowledge is purely technical, in metaphysical terms!

Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:48 am » by **Webcat**

Iamthatiam wrote:
Edgar 2.0 wrote:Kircher. The last man who knew Everything

Doesn't that bother you the present collective unconscious so departed from more 'consistent' informations?

Kircher had a huge heads up, my friend...Renaissance's pinacle of collective ideas. Today's knowledge is purely technical, in metaphysical terms!

It may be technical, but what was he pointing to?

Humans think they tread a linuar path of progress, but its circular.

They don't understand that the "I" is part of the all.

We exist because we are existance.

Each "I" is the singular entity which creates the 'all'.

We are 'all' because we are "I".

:cheers:

Make them a circle?

Wheels within wheels.

Time is realative to human experience - who defines what that experience is?

Humans?

Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:59 am » by **Iamthatiam**

Webcat wrote:It may be technical, but what was he pointing to?

I wasn't referring to Kircher's, old buddy...Just our present knowledge, deprived from spiritual substance.

Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:00 am » by **E6722maj**

Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:02 am » by **Edgar 2.0**

Iamthatiam wrote:
Edgar 2.0 wrote:Kircher. The last man who knew Everything

Doesn't that bother you the present collective unconscious so departed from more 'consistent' informations?

Kircher had a huge heads up, my friend...Renaissance's pinacle of collective ideas. Today's knowledge is purely technical, in metaphysical terms!

Yeah, it bothers me massively. But to each his own, i guess...

Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:10 am » by **Edgar 2.0**

Webcat wrote:
It may be technical, but what was he pointing to?

And whoever knows the reason of my sudden Freudian slip ... Kircher and Maiero :shock: