Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Obamacare

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 13728
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 4:45 pm
Location: Chicago

PostThu Jun 28, 2012 5:21 pm » by domdabears


In a victory for the New Deal bastardization of the Constitution, the Supreme Court has ruled that the government can mandate at gunpoint that Americans buy monopolized health care insurance.

“The Supreme Court upheld the health care law today in a splintered, complex opinion that appears to give President Obama a major victory,” reports USAToday.

In order to avoid arguments that the law is a misinterpretation of the Commerce Clause, the Court ruled that the requirement is a tax.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, who held the court’s swing vote, dissented. Reading from the bench, Kennedy said he and three conservative justices believe “the entire Act before us is invalid in its entirety.”

Polls conducted prior to the landmark vote indicate most Americans do not favor the law.

http://www.infowars.com/supreme-court-r ... obamacare/
I wanna be a Warhol
Displayed on your wall
Still hung up on you

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 18182
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:20 am
Location: underneath the circumstances

PostThu Jun 28, 2012 5:23 pm » by The57ironman


.


......big fight comin'.... :peep:

.
.

....remember....the authorities are working hard to keep you feeling helpless...

.

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 13728
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 4:45 pm
Location: Chicago

PostThu Jun 28, 2012 5:26 pm » by domdabears


The57ironman wrote:.


......big fight comin'.... :peep:

.

:shooting: :shooting: :shooting: :shooting:
I wanna be a Warhol
Displayed on your wall
Still hung up on you

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 18182
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:20 am
Location: underneath the circumstances

PostThu Jun 28, 2012 5:39 pm » by The57ironman


.

....you've probably already seen this but.... :peep:




Two patients limp into two different medical clinics with the same complaint.

Both have trouble walking and appear to require hip surgery.

The FIRST patient is examined within the hour, is x-rayed the same day and has a time booked for surgery the following week.

The SECOND sees his family doctor after waiting 3 weeks for an appointment, then waits 8 weeks to see a specialist, then gets an x-ray, which isn't reviewed for another week and finally has his surgery scheduled for 6 months from then pending the review boards decision on his age and remaining value to society.

Why the different treatment for the two patients?

The FIRST is a Golden Retriever taken to a vet.

The SECOND is a Senior Citizen on Obama care...

In November if He and his Czars get another term we'll all have to find a good vet.
.

....remember....the authorities are working hard to keep you feeling helpless...

.

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 13728
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 4:45 pm
Location: Chicago

PostThu Jun 28, 2012 5:40 pm » by domdabears


The57ironman wrote:.

....you've probably already seen this but.... :peep:




Two patients limp into two different medical clinics with the same complaint.

Both have trouble walking and appear to require hip surgery.

The FIRST patient is examined within the hour, is x-rayed the same day and has a time booked for surgery the following week.

The SECOND sees his family doctor after waiting 3 weeks for an appointment, then waits 8 weeks to see a specialist, then gets an x-ray, which isn't reviewed for another week and finally has his surgery scheduled for 6 months from then pending the review boards decision on his age and remaining value to society.

Why the different treatment for the two patients?

The FIRST is a Golden Retriever taken to a vet.

The SECOND is a Senior Citizen on Obama care...

In November if He and his Czars get another term we'll all have to find a good vet.


I haven't.

Pretty fucked up.
I wanna be a Warhol
Displayed on your wall
Still hung up on you



  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook