Tesseract

[Samuelthemule Profile Website]

Walter Russell will help with questions on light and the projection mirror geometry of reality.

thanks for the link, seems like a very interesting guy



buckminster fuller is of course another gem

[Cosmine Profile]

Actualy the tesseract is not a four dimensional object but a shadow analogy of a fourth dimensional object.
If what i said is difficult to comprehend...what more can i do?

It's like when i say there no such things as numbers for a mind that can graps the concept of the infinite then all numbers no mather how big they are become fractions of the infinite,all equivalent to zero.

OK i can see you's think i'm foolish,so listen to carl sagan.

[youtube]S6vyb6EsaP0&feature[/youtube]

[Samuelthemule Profile Website]

Actualy the tesseract is not a four dimensional object but a shadow analogy of a fourth dimensional object.
If what i said is difficult to comprehend...what more can i do?

It's like when i say there no such things as numbers for a mind that can graps the concept of the infinite then all numbers no mather how big they are become fractions of the infinite,all equivalent to zero.

OK i can see you's think i'm foolish,so listen to carl sagan.

[youtube]S6vyb6EsaP0&feature[/youtube]

i didn't think you were foolish, i thought what you said was true so i ignored it, mwuahaha :p

nah jk, i contemplated it.

hey, cosmine, what do you think of this

Is there a number at the root of the universe? A primal number that everything in the world hinges on? This question exercised many great minds of the twentieth century, among them the groundbreaking physicist Wolfgang Pauli and the famous psychoanalyst Carl Jung. Their obsession with the power of certain numbers—including 137, which describes the atom’s fine-structure constant and has great Kabbalistic significance—led them to develop an unlikely friendship and to embark on a joint mystical quest reaching deep into medieval alchemy, dream interpretation, and the Chinese Book of Changes. 137 explores the profound intersection of modern science with the occult, but above all it is the tale of an extraordinary, fruitful friendship between two of the greatest thinkers of our times. Originally published in hardcover as Deciphering the Cosmic Number. 66 b/w illustrations

137

http://www.amazon.com/137-Pauli-Pursuit-Scientific-Obsession/dp/0393338649/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1328747103&sr=8-1



137 is, interestingly enough, also the gemmatria number for the actual word kabbalah, mwuaha.

“Pauli once said that if the Lord allowed him to ask anything he wanted, his first question would be “Why 1/137?”

understandable really, when you see how embedded it is in the nature of reality and the structure of the cosmos. i wanna know too!

and i can't appreciate nearly as much as pauli, yet.

this is fairly simple though







http://synchromysticismforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=2614

it has nothing REALLY to do with judaism, and everything REALLY to do with the universe and counting in base 10 to observe it (why count in base 10? because we have 5, mirrored, senses, and 5 fingers.... dum dum baaaam!)



One hundred [and] thirty-seven is the 33rd prime number

5th prime harmonic number: i.e, DODECAHEDRON of the platonic universal form solids.











does anyone get it? can anyone put me out of my agony? share something really interesting?

i feel a bit like i'm going around in circles.

no?

nevermind, good night.

i'll content myself with sonnet 137 for now

Thou blind fool Love, what dost thou to mine eyes,
That they behold and see not what they see?
They know what beauty is, see where it lies,
Yet what the best is take the worst to be.
If eyes, corrupt by over-partial looks,
Be anchored in the bay where all men ride,
Why of eyes' falsehood hast thou forgèd hooks,
Whereto the judgment of my heart is tied?
Why should my heart think that a several plot
Which my heart knows the wide world's common place?
Or mine eyes seeing this, say this is not,
To put fair truth upon so foul a face?
In things right true my heart and eyes have erred,
And to this false plague are they now transferred.

William Shakespeare

will

i

am

[Evildweeb Profile]

Actualy the tesseract is not a four dimensional object but a shadow analogy of a fourth dimensional object.
If what i said is difficult to comprehend...what more can i do?

It's like when i say there no such things as numbers for a mind that can graps the concept of the infinite then all numbers no mather how big they are become fractions of the infinite,all equivalent to zero.

OK i can see you's think i'm foolish,so listen to carl sagan.

[youtube]S6vyb6EsaP0&feature[/youtube]

i didn't think you were foolish, i thought what you said was true so i ignored it, mwuahaha :p

nah jk, i contemplated it.

hey, cosmine, what do you think of this

Is there a number at the root of the universe? A primal number that everything in the world hinges on? This question exercised many great minds of the twentieth century, among them the groundbreaking physicist Wolfgang Pauli and the famous psychoanalyst Carl Jung. Their obsession with the power of certain numbers—including 137, which describes the atom’s fine-structure constant and has great Kabbalistic significance—led them to develop an unlikely friendship and to embark on a joint mystical quest reaching deep into medieval alchemy, dream interpretation, and the Chinese Book of Changes. 137 explores the profound intersection of modern science with the occult, but above all it is the tale of an extraordinary, fruitful friendship between two of the greatest thinkers of our times. Originally published in hardcover as Deciphering the Cosmic Number. 66 b/w illustrations

137

http://www.amazon.com/137-Pauli-Pursuit-Scientific-Obsession/dp/0393338649/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1328747103&sr=8-1



137 is, interestingly enough, also the gemmatria number for the actual word kabbalah, mwuaha.

“Pauli once said that if the Lord allowed him to ask anything he wanted, his first question would be “Why 1/137?”

understandable really, when you see how embedded it is in the nature of reality and the structure of the cosmos. i wanna know too!

and i can't appreciate nearly as much as pauli, yet.

this is fairly simple though







http://synchromysticismforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=2614

it has nothing REALLY to do with judaism, and everything REALLY to do with the universe and counting in base 10 to observe it (why count in base 10? because we have 5, mirrored, senses, and 5 fingers.... dum dum baaaam!)



One hundred [and] thirty-seven is the 33rd prime number

5th prime harmonic number: i.e, DODECAHEDRON of the platonic universal form solids.











does anyone get it? can anyone put me out of my agony? share something really interesting?

i feel a bit like i'm going around in circles.

no?

nevermind, good night.

i'll content myself with sonnet 137 for now

Thou blind fool Love, what dost thou to mine eyes,
That they behold and see not what they see?
They know what beauty is, see where it lies,
Yet what the best is take the worst to be.
If eyes, corrupt by over-partial looks,
Be anchored in the bay where all men ride,
Why of eyes' falsehood hast thou forgèd hooks,
Whereto the judgment of my heart is tied?
Why should my heart think that a several plot
Which my heart knows the wide world's common place?
Or mine eyes seeing this, say this is not,
To put fair truth upon so foul a face?
In things right true my heart and eyes have erred,
And to this false plague are they now transferred.

William Shakespeare

will

i

am

Wow

The Carl Sagan vid is proving a point here.

First, our perception of reality is mistaken.

There are and will always be several different takes on perceptual reality. With the apple analogy, we see as bending of perceptual reality as a supposed norm. If this true, then the perceptual reality is indeed flawed.


We should, at the simplest version, begin to reevaluate the concept of even the simplest point of reaity.

If this true, then is our perception of reality even correct?

Carl Sagan was way the frack ahead of our time.

He very well could be the Leonardo da Vinci of our physical world.

Kudos mate.

cheers

[Cosmine Profile]

Actualy the tesseract is not a four dimensional object but a shadow analogy of a fourth dimensional object.
If what i said is difficult to comprehend...what more can i do?

It's like when i say there no such things as numbers for a mind that can graps the concept of the infinite then all numbers no mather how big they are become fractions of the infinite,all equivalent to zero.

OK i can see you's think i'm foolish,so listen to carl sagan.

[youtube]S6vyb6EsaP0&feature[/youtube]

i didn't think you were foolish, i thought what you said was true so i ignored it, mwuahaha :p

nah jk, i contemplated it.

hey, cosmine, what do you think of this

Is there a number at the root of the universe? A primal number that everything in the world hinges on? This question exercised many great minds of the twentieth century, among them the groundbreaking physicist Wolfgang Pauli and the famous psychoanalyst Carl Jung. Their obsession with the power of certain numbers—including 137, which describes the atom’s fine-structure constant and has great Kabbalistic significance—led them to develop an unlikely friendship and to embark on a joint mystical quest reaching deep into medieval alchemy, dream interpretation, and the Chinese Book of Changes. 137 explores the profound intersection of modern science with the occult, but above all it is the tale of an extraordinary, fruitful friendship between two of the greatest thinkers of our times. Originally published in hardcover as Deciphering the Cosmic Number. 66 b/w illustrations

137

http://www.amazon.com/137-Pauli-Pursuit-Scientific-Obsession/dp/0393338649/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1328747103&sr=8-1



137 is, interestingly enough, also the gemmatria number for the actual word kabbalah, mwuaha.

“Pauli once said that if the Lord allowed him to ask anything he wanted, his first question would be “Why 1/137?”

understandable really, when you see how embedded it is in the nature of reality and the structure of the cosmos. i wanna know too!

and i can't appreciate nearly as much as pauli, yet.

this is fairly simple though







http://synchromysticismforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=2614

it has nothing REALLY to do with judaism, and everything REALLY to do with the universe and counting in base 10 to observe it (why count in base 10? because we have 5, mirrored, senses, and 5 fingers.... dum dum baaaam!)



One hundred [and] thirty-seven is the 33rd prime number

5th prime harmonic number: i.e, DODECAHEDRON of the platonic universal form solids.











does anyone get it? can anyone put me out of my agony? share something really interesting?

i feel a bit like i'm going around in circles.

no?

nevermind, good night.

i'll content myself with sonnet 137 for now

Thou blind fool Love, what dost thou to mine eyes,
That they behold and see not what they see?
They know what beauty is, see where it lies,
Yet what the best is take the worst to be.
If eyes, corrupt by over-partial looks,
Be anchored in the bay where all men ride,
Why of eyes' falsehood hast thou forgèd hooks,
Whereto the judgment of my heart is tied?
Why should my heart think that a several plot
Which my heart knows the wide world's common place?
Or mine eyes seeing this, say this is not,
To put fair truth upon so foul a face?
In things right true my heart and eyes have erred,
And to this false plague are they now transferred.

William Shakespeare

will

i

am

Sam,too much info's,you wan't my head to explode or what?
I'll come back to your post at midnight est.when it's quiet here in between the american and european shift.

Numbers are not my domain.(i look human but have an animal spirit.He,he! )

Still my first tought for an answer is zero.
Sometime last year,i aksed Lethicia's "what is the basis of the naga power?"
She answered,"We are the negation of everything,even the negation of negation."
Pretty criptic as it's her style,but theres something there to meditate.
By opposite the archon mind and mind control is base on "make believe"
So they can even "convince an eskimo to buy a fridge." Like we say over here.

[Antimalware Profile]

The Tesseract

A Physical Metaphor for our Movement through time ...



The Fourth Dimensional View of Man...



Incarnated as a Result of our Emanation From The Source...