The Haiti Earthquake Conspiracy Did the U.S Gov attack Haiti

[Undaunted Profile]

This explains alot
[youtube]<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vxooms_PUVs&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vxooms_PUVs&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>[/youtube]














You decide.....I already have

[Lowsix Profile]

That is the dumbest pile of shit.
(not your post...the premise)

That poor idiot (dude in video) Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc'd himself to death.

[Undaunted Profile]

What I thought was interesting was the information,I could care less who or what the guy in the video acted like.The point of the strategic placement of U.S troops in between Venezuela and Cuba as well as the drills for an event in Haiti on the same day.Very reminiscent of 9/11 and other major disasters.


premiss. Logic. a proposition supporting or helping to support a conclusion.

There are alot of conclusions that can be made...there is nothing out of the question about this one

[Lowsix Profile]

And again, understand i know youre just presenting information.

But that one detail simply doesn't support the conclusion.

BOTH Large ports in Haiti were DESTROYED.
Infrastructure...destroyed.

You dont destroy infrastructure of the hosting nation you presume to be launching from.

Its not logical. We have a base(s) in Cuba.
We can reach Venezuela from Florida.

The premise is broken.

Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc..
Because of this, therefore This...
ie..Drills equal invasion...
Doesnt compute, even if suspicious..it doest act as evidence for the conclusion..based on OTHER problems with the proposed assumption.

Just more paranoid antiAmerican propaganda
from a third-hand wordpress blogger who just figured out Utube.

[Undaunted Profile]

"Just more paranoid antiAmerican propaganda
from a third-hand wordpress blogger who just figured out Utube"

I have all the reason to question all of Americas motives,intentions,and agendas.I am American and I am sick of how our citizens are treated and how our government occupies so many countries under any reason legal or not.I had friends who lost their lives on 9/11 and I have family who have lost their retirement,homes,and livelyhood due to American corruption.Ant-american...no I am ant-bullshit and the stuff going down in Haiti from the disaster to the donation scandal is all BS.You can write if off and be smug all you want,but if you truly believe what they say happened,to me you still have a ways to go.no offense.

[Lowsix Profile]

Well, then explain away all of my objections, please.
Show me how occupying a destroyed country with no infrastructure or Deep water ports supports this guys premise. Not to mention the dollar amount we have dumped on them..worldwide..

You really think after Iraq the rest of the world would commit a BILLION dollars to the effort if they even thought for a second that was what we were up to?

Dont think so.

So address these points effectively, and ill have to consider it..
till then..Its bullshit antiamerican speculation with ZERO proof...
other than a simple coincidence...(which is still odd to me, but not proof by any stretch).

BOTH Large ports in Haiti were DESTROYED.
Infrastructure...destroyed.

You dont destroy infrastructure of the hosting nation you presume to be launching from.

Its not logical. We have a base(s) in Cuba.
We can reach Venezuela from Florida.

The premise is broken.

[Depompey Profile]

IMHO... you don't nee an infrastructure to occupy an enemy's backyard... just a reason. Everything is too coincidental.

[Lowsix Profile]

IMHO... you don't nee an infrastructure to occupy an enemy's backyard... just a reason. Everything is too coincidental.

And that reason is what exactly.

Remember the FACTS i mentioned.

1. We have bases in Cuba to attack from if we needed to..
2. We can reach Venezuela from Florida if need be.
3. BOTH ports are destroyed so the Navy is useless...
And we would need the Navy to use that as a base of any importance.
4. A basic core infrastructure is needed...and that has been effectively destroyed..for at least five years to come.

Can no one logically counter those objections?

Its like saying..That Speculation and Paranoia, and Anti-Americanism means more to prove this Mystery Plot than the real "on the ground" operational details and facts, and logistical considerations..

[Fibkiller Profile]

'commit a BILLION dollars to the effort'

...so that the FED can print to print more money and keep the world enslaved to debt.

and regards to the destruction ports etc? Obviously you wouldnt want destruction all round with infrastructure maintained intact for the troops. You gotta make it look real.

Truth is good, and absolute lies will eventually let the truth resurface... but when but when they mix elements of truth to the lies, that's when they got you scuppered!

[Lowsix Profile]

'commit a BILLION dollars to the effort'

That Billion comes from all countries OTHER than the USA.

America is not printing money for Haiti..see? More absolutely unsupported and uninformed speculation to FORCE fit the theory. We are providing mostly loan assurances. We are NOT sending cash, and we are NOT printing money for the operation. Besides the MAJORITY of money committed from America is coming from Citizens and aid organizations..(regardless if anyone believes that or not)

I ask would The rest of the world commit that amount of money if they even SUSPECTED for a second we had not only orchestrated it, but used it to occupy Haiti?

Dont think so...and the Russians knew about our plans about Iraq before even the British, so don't say that we just kept it secret from everyone. On that scale..its not possible.

Scepticism is great.
Making stuff up to fit a particular world view is not.