The Three Laws of Republicans

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1811
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:24 pm
Location: Earth, for now

You might like:

PostTue Jul 19, 2011 4:45 am » by Evildweeb


The Three Laws of Republicans

The Three Laws of Republicans, often shortened to The Three Laws or Three Laws, are paraphrased from the science fiction author Isaac Asimov and later expanded upon. The original Robotic rules are introduced in his 1942 short story "Runaround", although they were foreshadowed in a few earlier stories. The three laws have been adapted for Republicans since as robots, the identity has become blurred over time. The Three Laws are:

1. A Republican may not injure another Republican or, through inaction, allow another Republican to come to harm.

2. A Republican must obey any orders given to it by higher Republicans, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.

3. A Republican must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.


The same could be said for Democrats, but I have neither the time nor the patience.


Official original by Evildweeb
Image "...I give half my money to alcohol, women, and gambling. The other half I just waste..." - W.C. Fields

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 5223
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2010 10:57 pm

PostTue Jul 19, 2011 4:46 am » by Otoel


evildweeb wrote:The Three Laws of Republicans

The Three Laws of Republicans, often shortened to The Three Laws or Three Laws, are paraphrased from the science fiction author Isaac Asimov and later expanded upon. The original Robotic rules are introduced in his 1942 short story "Runaround", although they were foreshadowed in a few earlier stories. The three laws have been adapted for Republicans since as robots, the identity has become blurred over time. The Three Laws are:

1. A Republican may not injure another Republican or, through inaction, allow another Republican to come to harm.

2. A Republican must obey any orders given to it by higher Republicans, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.

3. A Republican must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.


The same could be said for Democrats, but I have neither the time nor the patience.


Official original by Evildweeb


Nice! I love it cause its an original! I like threads like this where people actually think! :clapper:
evidence of what,otoel? that you're fucking certifiably insane? you watch a children's show,and analyze it,for hours then in your spare time,you give distorted scripture studies for a bunch of losers on the interweb.-Boon

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 815
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:44 pm

PostTue Jul 19, 2011 5:03 am » by Truthseekerx


The two party system is a two-headed snake--same agenda, same puppet master.

Some individuals are exceptions to the rule, like Ron Paul, who is basically a Libertarian rather than a contemporary Republican.

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

We are listed at the www.topparanormalsites.com website. Click here to vote for us.. Thank you :-)