The US sues the brittish crown(BP) for 10 quadtrillion $$'s?

Initiate
Posts: 844
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 1:15 am

PostSat Jun 19, 2010 10:29 am » by Umbrex


By AvalonRoundTable © 2010

June 18, 2010

Sovereign Citizens of the United States of America have filed a Lis Pendens against the British Crown on behalf of The People of America through its only legitimate agent, The United States of America.

The Lis Pendens was signed on June 15, 2010 by Trustees Charles C: Miller & Dean Arlo: Arp of 1402 Auburn Way N #416, Auburn, WA 98002 and delivered (faxed) June 16, 2010, unto the person of Her Majesty’s Treasury, The Rt. Honorable George Osborne MP, 21W1, HM Treasury, 1 Horse Guards Road, London SW1A 2HQ.

Briefly, according to Wikipedia,

“a Lis pendens is Latin for “suit pending.” This may refer to any pending lawsuit or to a specific situation with a public notice of litigation that has been recorded in the same location where the title of real property has been recorded. This notice secures a plaintiff’s claim on the property so that the sale, mortgage, or encumbrance of the property will not diminish plaintiff’s rights to the property, should the plaintiff prevail in its case. In some jurisdictions, when the notice is properly recorded, lis pendens is considered constructive notice to the other litigants or other unrecorded or subordinate lienholders. The term is sometimes abbreviated as “lis pend”.
In current practice, a lis pendens is a written notice that a lawsuit has been filed concerning real estate, involving either the title to the property or a claimed ownership interest in it. The notice is usually filed in the county land records office. Recording a lis pendens against a piece of property alerts a potential purchaser or lender that the property’s title is in question, which makes the property less attractive to a buyer or lender. After the notice is filed, anyone who nevertheless purchases the land or property described in the notice takes subject to the ultimate decision of the lawsuit.
The recording office will record a lis pendens upon request of anyone who claims to be entitled to do so (e.g. because he has filed a lawsuit). If someone else with an interest in the property (e.g. the owner) believes the lis pendens is not proper, he can then file suit to have it expunged.
Some states’ lis pendens statutes require the filer of the notice, in the event of a challenge to the notice, to establish that it has probable cause or a good likelihood of success on the merits of its case in the underlying lawsuit; other statutes do not have such a requirement.”

The NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS appears to be authentic, and has serious ramifications. The history of Lis Pendens as stated in the same Wikipedia article goes on to explain;

“…Under the common law, the mere existence of a lawsuit potentially affecting the title to real property had the legal effect of putting the entire world on constructive notice of the suit; anyone acquiring an interest in real property which was the subject of a pending suit took that interest subject to the litigants’ rights as they might be eventually determined, no matter how much later. In effect, nothing relating to the ownership of the subject matter of the suit could be definitively changed while the suit was pending. Innocent buyers might discover the existence of a lawsuit too late.


The harsh effect of this rule, and especially its effect on innocent purchasers (particularly vis-à-vis not-so-innocent sellers), led many jurisdictions to enact lis pendens statutes requiring a written notice, usually recorded in the land records where the real estate is located, for the notice provisions of the rule to be effective. Typically, a separate recorded instrument is required by statute if the lawsuit in question affects title to real property. If the statutory requirements are met, the world is put on “constructive notice” of the existence of the suit, and any person acquiring an interest later does so subject to the outcome of the suit.

Lis pendens is taken as constructive notice of the pending lawsuit, and it serves to place a cloud on the title of the property in question until the suit is resolved and the notice released or the lis pendens is expunged. Reputable, careful lenders will not lend money on the security of land which is subject to a lis pendens, as title insurance companies will not insure the title to such land: title is taken subject to the outcome of the lawsuit. Because so much real property is purchased with borrowed money, this largely keeps the owner from selling the property. It also may keep the owner from borrowing money secured by the property (such as to pay the costs of defending the suit). Similarly, careful buyers will be unwilling to purchase the land, at least not at what the full value would be without the cloud on title.
It is important to note that the presence of a lis pendens does not prevent or necessarily invalidate a transfer of the property, although it makes such a transfer subject to the outcome of the litigation. As such, it tends to scare off diligent, reputable lenders and careful buyers. Thus, the owner is not prevented from selling the land for (non-borrowed) cash, pledging it as security for a speculative loan, or giving it away—subject to the outcome of the lawsuit. However, once the lis pendens is recorded, the recipient (a “purchaser” or “grantee pendente lite”) would be deemed to have notice of the litigation, and thus would not be a bona fide purchaser, and the title might be regained.”

The Lis Pendens begins with a statements that define the filers as “Sovereigns in our own right as recognized by The Crown’s prior obligation”, and that the document “constitute international notice to be made public under Human Rights and Humanity’s right to protect its collective self against trespass and theft by acts and omissions cognizable under International Law and International Agreements enforceable by consent of parties bound thereto.”

Further the notice states that, “The United States Federal Corporation has abandoned its obligations to those who ultimately authorized its original construction, now administered by a mere commercial entity for profit in which The Crown holds interest.”

The FACTS presented include:

* The British Crown is franchisor of all corporate entities operating under or out of Britain and The Commonwealth.
* Legal title to said corporation is held by The Crown with equity operating position of corporations held by agents under corporate charter whose management and stockholders are subject to Crown authorities.
* Thereby all acts or omissions of said corporations are attached to The Crown through license and provably so by taxes collected on operation of said corporations.
* The Crown holds ownership position in BRITISH PETROLEUM in conjunction with partners through interlocking directorates, disclosed and undisclosed.

The following is a summary listing of FACTS:

BRITISH PETROLEUM’S failure to act to prevent toxins, poisons, benzene in particular, results in crimes of international consequence:

1. Crimes Against Humanity
2. Crimes Against Peace
3. War Crimes

The Notice of Lis Pendens concludes with the following statements:

“The Sovereignty of The People of America through its only legitimate international agent, The United States of America, republic union of states individually holding The One People’s properties in the form of political will duly assigned and accepted under Constitutions constructing said States, now lodge LIS PENDENS BEFORE THE ENTIRE WORLD IN THE SUM OF TEN QUAD TRILLION DOLLARS, current lawful funds for current damages, contingent continuing dmages for trespass, invasion by chemical and biological agents released by a private Crown Corporation,

“… Thereby any acts of harassment towards Trustees or any American claimant will be deemed an Act of War”

The document is signed by Charles C: Miller & Dean Arlo: Arp on the 15th day of June 2010. Four other Trustees are listed, although their signatures are not on the document, they are: Percy C: Helmer, Joseph Edward: Casey, James Tucker-Bey & Randall Lynn: Harper

WARNING & DISCLAIMER:

The document(s) appears to be authentic – although NOT authenticated to date.

The Original Documents are uploaded to TheLibertyForum on Scribd

George Osborne is the Chancellor of the Exchequer.

http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/contact_index.htm

http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/

SOURCE:

TheShowmebby

McCollum Project C.

The Chancellor of the Exchequer is the title held by the British Cabinet minister who is responsible for all economic and financial matters. Often simply called The Chancellor, the office-holder controls HM Treasury and plays a role akin to the posts of Minister of Finance or Secretary of the Treasury in other nations. The position is considered one of the four Great Offices of State and in recent times has come to be the most powerful office in British politics after the Prime Minister. It is the only office of the four Great Offices not to have been occupied by a woman.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/33263234/3325 ... -061410-NN

http://theintelhub.com/2010/06/19/bp-lis-pendens/

Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:35 am

PostSat Jun 19, 2010 10:37 am » by Boyakasha


well as the company is called Beyond Petroleum and it is not even british , you yanks wanna sue the right ppl first :|

Initiate
Posts: 844
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 1:15 am

PostSat Jun 19, 2010 10:41 am » by Umbrex


boyakasha wrote:well as the company is called Beyond Petroleum and it is not even british , you yanks wanna sue the right ppl first :|

BRITISH PETROLEUM’S failure to act to prevent toxins, poisons, benzene in particular, results in crimes of international consequence:

1. Crimes Against Humanity
2. Crimes Against Peace
3. War Crimes


what?

so what if thew queen has to sell canada, she would still own 20% of the landmass.

Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:35 am

PostSat Jun 19, 2010 10:45 am » by Boyakasha


In 2001 the company formally renamed itself as BP plc and adopted the tagline "Beyond Petroleum," which remains in use today.
It is no longer british it is a global corparation which has headquarters in london and BP America's headquarters is in the One Westlake Park in the Energy Corridor area of Houston, Texas.

Initiate
Posts: 844
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 1:15 am

PostSat Jun 19, 2010 10:49 am » by Umbrex


boyakasha wrote:In 2001 the company formally renamed itself as BP plc and adopted the tagline "Beyond Petroleum," which remains in use today.
It is no longer british it is a global corparation which has headquarters in london and BP America's headquarters is in the One Westlake Park in the Energy Corridor area of Houston, Texas.


Damn, you're right.

:flop:

It would seem like not many know this.

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 467
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 2:53 pm

PostSat Jun 19, 2010 11:28 am » by Bettyboolean


yeah BP is also as much a descendent of AMOCO/STANDARD OIL as it is of British Petroleum. All this anti Brit rhetoric is the height of hypocrisy.
ImageImage

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1414
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 7:17 pm
Location: Wales

PostSat Jun 19, 2010 11:31 am » by Cwmman


would you yanks be happy with just the Royal Family ,they would make a good tourist attraction and you wouldnt have to travel to far to see them.
So we would all benifit then, we stop giving them our £ and you charge people $ to see them
You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—
after they’ve tried everything else.
Winston Churchill.

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 467
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 2:53 pm

PostSat Jun 19, 2010 11:37 am » by Bettyboolean


cwmman wrote:would you yanks be happy with just the Royal Family ,they would make a good tourist attraction and you wouldnt have to travel to far to see them.
So we would all benifit then, we stop giving them our £ and you charge people $ to see them


yeah they can have the monarchy as compensation LOL!
ImageImage

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1414
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 7:17 pm
Location: Wales

PostSat Jun 19, 2010 11:41 am » by Cwmman


bettyboolean wrote:
cwmman wrote:would you yanks be happy with just the Royal Family ,they would make a good tourist attraction and you wouldnt have to travel to far to see them.
So we would all benifit then, we stop giving them our £ and you charge people $ to see them


yeah they can have the monarchy as compensation LOL!
You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—
after they’ve tried everything else.
Winston Churchill.

Initiate
Posts: 524
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 5:21 am

PostSat Jun 19, 2010 12:07 pm » by Godsofatlantis


Disinfo....

Why do I think that? Source = Wikipedia. We all know Wikipedia is not even reliable. And I find it interesting that most of you believe it right away.

Second of all how the hell can the british government afford 10 Quadrillian?
Remember folks if you want to block post's from known disinfo or wacko's go to the friends and foe's section of the control panel.

In no time you won't have to sort out through all that crap they post.


Next

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook