The windows weren't bulletproof!?

Sun Dec 12, 2010 7:37 pm » by **Nilm33**

I just found out that the windows on prince and cams car werent bulletproof and had no protection whatsoever... Are you %&*@(! kidding me!

That was your only chance England, you blew it lol...

Our leaders here in the states roll around in tanks they're so afraid of us.
You guys are way to civil lol.

Of course, mabye he was holo prince at that moment, he sure did seem calm lol.

Sun Dec 12, 2010 7:39 pm » by **Otoel**

So how does this realization change the facts?

Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:08 pm » by **Watcherof**

I find it very interesting "they" were riding around in an old car without "protection" and just "allowed" to go into the square with protesters.

Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:23 pm » by **Funnyman46**

Interesting point if true, where was his security team? You would almost think it would have / could have been another Princess Dianna. Do they want the new guy in place of Charles?

Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:28 pm » by **Watcherof**

funnyman46 wrote:Interesting point if true, where was his security team? You would almost think it would have / could have been another Princess Dianna. Do they want the new guy in place of Charles?

You brought up Princess Diana.

She has many admirers still and her children are older now.

English history is so full of this kind of intrigue is it not?

Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:43 pm » by **Funnyman46**

watcherof wrote:
funnyman46 wrote:Interesting point if true, where was his security team? You would almost think it would have / could have been another Princess Dianna. Do they want the new guy in place of Charles?

You brought up Princess Diana.

She has many admirers still and her children are older now.

English history is so full of this kind of intrigue is it not?

The princess was a good person, no one will argue that.
It just seems that they could have removed the old Charles and supplanted the new young prince as a way to (deceive) rally the sympathy of Britons back to their nation and hopes of calming the people down at the same time.

Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:46 pm » by **Scoundrel1975**

Bollocks to our royalty just more of the elite fat catting away on our taxes

:alien:

Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:51 pm » by **Watcherof**

Well,
I really do hope that this is all a sign that the steamrolled British people are starting to wake up.
They have been giving away their hard earned money to the elites for years...so the elites can live in luxury.

I once asked a Brit about this....they said, the royalty was like an institution...a historical remnant ...a cultural thing...

I thought this was ridiculous. I hope Brits are finally waking up.

Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:56 pm » by **Scoundrel1975**

watcherof wrote:Well,
I really do hope that this is all a sign that the steamrolled British people are starting to wake up.
They have been giving away their hard earned money to the elites for years...so the elites can live in luxury.

I once asked a Brit about this....they said, the royalty was like an institution...a historical remnant ...a cultural thing...

I thought this was ridiculous. I hope Brits are finally waking up.

I've never had pride or loyalty towards the royals theyre just slimey leeching scum eating away at our taxes, they should get proper jobs, I hope their genitals fall off

:alien:

Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:56 pm » by **Aardvaaks**

watcherof wrote:I find it very interesting "they" were riding around in an old car without "protection" and just "allowed" to go into the square with protesters.

Fact is most of these people were just startled Christmas shoppers.
The Rolls concerned was actually one past used of the Queens own fleet, so I doubt very much that it was a standard built Rolls Royce.