TITANIC SUNK BY THE MOON!

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 7400
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 9:09 pm

PostFri Mar 09, 2012 2:55 pm » by Mozi!!a


Image

Researchers have concluded that a rare lunar event was the real cause of the sinking of the Titanic.

Exceptionally high tides caused by a rare conjunction of celestial events could have placed the fateful iceberg in the Titanic’s path.

The Titanic collided with an iceberg the night of April 14, 1912 and sank within hours, with the loss of around 1,500 lives.

And according to a team at Texas State University, an unusually close approach of the moon three months earlier could have raised water levels, refloating hundreds of beached icebergs.

Image

wow
On January 4 that year, the moon and sun had lined up in such a way their gravitational pulls enhanced each other – an effect well-known as a spring tide.

But, on top of this, the moon’s perigee — its closest approach to Earth — was the nearest in 1,400 years, and came within six minutes of a full moon. Enhancing the effect, the Earth’s perihelion — its closest approach to the sun — took place the day before.

“It was the closest approach of the moon to the Earth in more than 1,400 years, and this configuration maximized the moon’s tide-raising forces on Earth’s oceans. That’s remarkable,” says physicist Donald Olson.

“The full moon could be any time of the month. The perigee could be any time of the month. Think of how many minutes there are in a month.”

The north Atlantic was full of icebergs that spring – indeed, shipping lanes were moved many miles to the south for the whole of the 1912 season.


Image

The researchers’ first theory was that the increased tides had caused a rise in calving. But they quickly discounted this idea, realizing that in order to reach the shipping lanes by April when the Titanic sank, any icebergs breaking off the Greenland glaciers in January would have to have moved unusually fast and against prevailing currents.

Image

The team’s now suggesting that the answer lies in grounded and stranded icebergs. As Greenland icebergs travel southward, many become stuck in the shallow waters off the coasts of Labrador and Newfoundland. Normally, they stay there until they’ve melted enough to refloat, or a high enough tide frees them.

But the unusually high tide that January, they say, would have freed many more than usual, and would have moved them back into the southbound ocean currents just in time to rendezvous with the Titanic.

“As icebergs travel south, they often drift into shallow water and pause along the coasts of Labrador and Newfoundland. But an extremely high spring tide could refloat them, and the ebb tide would carry them back out into the Labrador Current where the icebergs would resume drifting southward,” says Olson.

“That could explain the abundant icebergs in the spring of 1912. We don’t claim to know exactly where the Titanic iceberg was in January 1912 — nobody can know that – but this is a plausible scenario intended to be scientifically reasonable.”

Image

The world’s most famous luxury liner plunged to the bottom of the frigid North Atlantic on a moonless night during its maiden voyage almost exactly a century ago. The smoking gun was a block of ice — a massive berg that had calved away from Greenland and drifted down into the heavily traveled shipping lanes. On April 15, 1912, the unsinkable Titanic met the unmovable iceberg and in less than three hours, the ship was no more, taking 1,500 passengers and crew members down with it.

http://weeklyworldnews.com/headlines/45 ... -the-moon/

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 4742
Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 11:32 pm

PostFri Mar 09, 2012 3:07 pm » by Will69ease


You do realize that anything found on weeklyworldnews is not meant to be taken seriously.
Like "the onion" it is a spoof on news. The picture in the top left corner should be a clue.
Image
here are a couple more breaking headlines from the same source...
Image

Image



  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook