Triangle Ufo on Moon?

Initiate
Posts: 928
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 9:04 am

PostMon Sep 20, 2010 5:38 am » by Wakemeup




@Kris75.....can you post some info where to look and when?? and thx for sharing


Sure...if the moon was a clock. Look at 8 o'clock in full screen and you will see part of a triangle sticking just past the edge on the moon. Hope that helps. Maybe Im the only dumbass who can see it I guess. I could be reptilian...lol :alien51:

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 8598
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 3:28 am

PostMon Sep 20, 2010 5:42 am » by Kris75


wakemeup wrote:


@Kris75.....can you post some info where to look and when?? and thx for sharing


Sure...if the moon was a clock. Look at 8 o'clock in full screen and you will see part of a triangle sticking just past the edge on the moon. Hope that helps. Maybe Im the only dumbass who can see it I guess. I could be reptilian...lol :alien51:


:flop: :alien51: :alien51: :nails: :scary: :alien51:

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 8598
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 3:28 am

PostMon Sep 20, 2010 6:00 am » by Kris75


COULD BE THIS MOON CASTLE OR THE SHARD, JUST SHARING MY THOUGHT

Image

Image

"The Castle", one of the structures identified in lunar photographs, identified by Richard Hoagland



THE SHARD

The Shard is an obvious structure which rises above the Moon's surface by more than a mile. Its overall irregular spindly shape (containing a regular geometric pattern) with constricted nodes and swollen internodes, if natural, has got to be a wonder of the Universe. No known natural process can explain such a structure. Computer enhancement with about 190 feet (60 meters) resolution shows an irregular outline with more reflective and less reflective surfaces. The amount of sunlight reflecting from parts of the Shard indicate a composition inconsistent with that of most natural substances. Only crystal facets and glass can reflect that much light (polished metallic surfaces are unnatural). Single crystals the size of city blocks are currently unknown. I concur with Hoagland that the Shard may be a highly eroded remnant of some sort of artificial structure made of glass-like material. Other larger structures and their reflectivity in the area support this theory



Image

Image

:flop: :look: :look: http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients ... rs_01.html :alien: :alien:

Conspirator
Posts: 2514
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 4:02 pm

PostMon Sep 20, 2010 6:04 am » by Punjedi


Man I love moon mysteries!

Here are some fun tidbits some of you may not have known, or just want to rehash what you did....


STRANGE MOON FACTS

Compiled by Ronald Regehr

The moon is the Rosetta stone of the planets." —Robert Jastrow,
First Chairman, NASA Lunar Exploration Committee

After hundreds of years of detailed observation and study, our closest companion in the vast universe, Earth’s moon, remains an enigma. Six moon landings and hundreds of experiments have resulted in more questions being asked than answered. Among them:

1. Moon’s Age: The moon is far older than previously expected. Maybe even older than the Earth or the Sun. The oldest age for the Earth is estimated to be 4.6 billion years old; moon rocks were dated at 5.3 billion years old, and the dust upon which they were resting was at least another billion years older.

2. Rock’s Origin: The chemical composition of the dust upon which the rocks sat differed remarkably from the rocks themselves, contrary to accepted theories that the dust resulted from weathering and breakup of the rocks themselves. The rocks had to have come from somewhere else.

3. Heavier Elements on Surface: Normal planetary composition results in heavier elements in the core and lighter materials at the surface; not so with the moon. According to Wilson, "The abundance of refractory elements like titanium in the surface areas is so pronounced that several geologists proposed the refractory compounds were brought to the moon’s surface in great quantity in some unknown way. They don’t know how, but that it was done cannot be questioned." (Emphasis added).

4. Water Vapor: On March 7, 1971, lunar instruments placed by the astronauts recorded a vapor cloud of water passing across the surface of the moon. The cloud lasted 14 hours and covered an area of about 100 square miles.

5. Magnetic Rocks: Moon rocks were magnetized. This is odd because there is no magnetic field on the moon itself. This could not have originated from a "close call" with Earth—such an encounter would have ripped the moon apart.

6. No Volcanoes: Some of the moon’s craters originated internally, yet there is no indication that the moon was ever hot enough to produce volcanic eruptions.

7. Moon Mascons: Mascons, which are large, dense, circular masses lying twenty to forty miles beneath the centers of the moon’s maria, "are broad, disk-shaped objects that could be possibly some kind of artificial construction. For huge circular disks are not likely to be beneath each huge maria, centered like bull’s-eyes in the middle of each, by coincidence or accident." (Emphasis added).

8. Seismic Activity: Hundreds of "moonquakes" are recorded each year that cannot be attributed to meteor strikes. In November, 1958, Soviet astronomer Nikolay A. Kozyrev of the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory photographed a gaseous eruption of the moon near the crater Alphonsus. He also detected a reddish glow that lasted for about an hour. In 1963, astronomers at the Lowell Observatory also saw reddish glows on the crests of ridges in the Aristarchus region. These observations have proved to be precisely identical and periodical, repeating themselves as the moon moves closer to the Earth. These are probably not natural phenomena.

9. Hollow Moon: The moon’s mean density is 3.34 gm/cm3 (3.34 times an equal volume of water) whereas the Earth’s is 5.5. What does this mean? In 1962, NASA scientist Dr. Gordon MacDonald stated, "If the astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that the interior of the moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere." Nobel chemist Dr. Harold Urey suggested the moon’s reduced density is because of large areas inside the moon where is "simply a cavity." MIT’s Dr. Sean C. Solomon wrote, "the Lunar Orbiter experiments vastly improved our knowledge of the moon’s gravitational field . . . indicating the frightening possibility that the moon might be hollow." In Carl Sagan’s treatise, Intelligent Life in the Universe, the famous astronomer stated, "A natural satellite cannot be a hollow object."

10. Moon Echoes: On November 20, 1969, the Apollo 12 crew jettisoned the lunar module ascent stage causing it to crash onto the moon. The LM’s impact (about 40 miles from the Apollo 12 landing site) created an artificial moonquake with startling characteristics—the moon reverberated like a bell for more than an hour. This phenomenon was repeated with Apollo 13 (intentionally commanding the third stage to impact the moon), with even more startling results. Seismic instruments recorded that the reverberations lasted for three hours and twenty minutes and traveled to a depth of twenty-five miles, leading to the conclusion that the moon has an unusually light—or even no—core.

11. Unusual Metals: The moon’s crust is much harder than presumed. Remember the extreme difficulty the astronauts encountered when they tried to drill into the maria? Surprise! The maria is composed primarily illeminite, a mineral containing large amounts of titanium, the same metal used to fabricate the hulls of deep-diving submarines and the skin of the SR-71 "Blackbird". Uranium 236 and neptunium 237 (elements not found in nature on Earth) were discovered in lunar rocks, as were rustproof iron particles.

12. Moon’s Origin: Before the astronauts’ moon rocks conclusively disproved the theory, the moon was believed to have originated when a chunk of Earth broke off eons ago (who knows from where?). Another theory was that the moon was created from leftover "space dust" remaining after the Earth was created. Analysis of the composition of moon rocks disproved this theory also. Another popular theory is that the moon was somehow "captured" by the Earth’s gravitational attraction. But no evidence exists to support this theory. Isaac Asimov, stated, "It’s too big to have been captured by the Earth. The chances of such a capture having been effected and the moon then having taken up nearly circular orbit around our Earth are too small to make such an eventuality credible."

13. Weird Orbit: Our moon is the only moon in the solar system that has a stationary, near-perfect circular orbit. Stranger still, the moon’s center of mass is about 6000 feet closer to the Earth than its geometric center (which should cause wobbling), but the moon’s bulge is on the far side of the moon, away from the Earth. "Something" had to put the moon in orbit with its precise altitude, course, and speed.

14. Moon Diameter: How does one explain the "coincidence" that the moon is just the right distance, coupled with just the right diameter, to completely cover the sun during an eclipse? Again, Isaac Asimov responds, "There is no astronomical reason why the moon and the sun should fit so well. It is the sheerest of coincidences, and only the Earth among all the planets is blessed in this fashion."

15. Spaceship Moon: As outrageous as the Moon-Is-a-Spaceship Theory is, all of the above items are resolved if one assumes that the moon is a gigantic extraterrestrial craft, brought here eons ago by intelligent beings. This is the only theory that is supported by all of the data, and there are no data that contradict this theory.




Greek authors Aristotle and Plutarch, and Roman authors Apolllonius Rhodius and Ovid all wrote of a group of people called the Proselenes who lived in the central mountainous area of Greece called Arcadia The Proselenes claimed title to this area because their forebears were there "before there was a moon in the heavens." This claim is substantiated by symbols on the wall of the Courtyard of Kalasasaya, near the city of Tiahuanaco, Bolivia, which record that the moon came into orbit around the Earth between 11,500 and 13, 000 years ago, long before recorded history.
1. Ages of Flashes: Aristarchus, Plato, Eratosthenes, Biela, Rabbi Levi, and Posidonius all reported anomalous lights on the moon. NASA, one year before the first lunar landing, reported 570+ lights and flashes were observed on the moon from 1540 to 1967.
2. Operation Moon Blink: NASA’s Operation Moon Blink detected 28 lunar events in a relatively short period of time.
3. Lunar Bridge: On July 29, 1953, John J. O’Neill observed a 12-mile-long bridge straddling the crater Mare Crisium. In August, British astronomer Dr. H.P. Wilkens verified its presence, "It looks artificial. It’s almost incredible that such a thing could have been formed in the first instance, or if it was formed, could have lasted during the ages in which the moon has been in existence.
4. The Shard: The Shard, an obelisk-shaped object that towers 1½ miles from the Ukert area of the moon’s surface, was discovered by Orbiter 3 in 1968. Dr. Bruce Cornet, who studied the amazing photographs, stated, "No known natural process can explain such a structure."
5. The Tower: One of the most curious features ever photographed on the Lunar surface (Lunar Orbiter photograph III-84M) is an amazing spire that rises more than 5 miles from the Sinus Medii region of the lunar surface.
6. The Obelisks: Lunar Orbiter II took several photographs in November 1966 that showed several obelisks, one of which was more than 150 feet tall. ". . . the spires were arranged in precisely the same was as the apices of the three great pyramids."

Don Ecker, Long Saga of Lunar Anomalies, UFO magazine, Vol. 10, Nol 2 (March/April 1995), p. 23.
Ibid., p. 24
Ibid.
Six Mysterious Statuesque Shadows Photographed on the Moon by Orbiter, The Washington Post, Nov. 22, 1966, p. 1.
Image
Nihil Sine Fide!

Initiate
Posts: 928
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 9:04 am

PostMon Sep 20, 2010 6:13 am » by Wakemeup


kris75 wrote:COULD BE THIS MOON CASTLE OR THE SHARD, JUST SHARING MY THOUGHT

Image

Image

"The Castle", one of the structures identified in lunar photographs, identified by Richard Hoagland




THE SHARD

The Shard is an obvious structure which rises above the Moon's surface by more than a mile. Its overall irregular spindly shape (containing a regular geometric pattern) with constricted nodes and swollen internodes, if natural, has got to be a wonder of the Universe. No known natural process can explain such a structure. Computer enhancement with about 190 feet (60 meters) resolution shows an irregular outline with more reflective and less reflective surfaces. The amount of sunlight reflecting from parts of the Shard indicate a composition inconsistent with that of most natural substances. Only crystal facets and glass can reflect that much light (polished metallic surfaces are unnatural). Single crystals the size of city blocks are currently unknown. I concur with Hoagland that the Shard may be a highly eroded remnant of some sort of artificial structure made of glass-like material. Other larger structures and their reflectivity in the area support this theory



Image

Image

:flop: :look: :look: http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients ... rs_01.html :alien: :alien:

Hmmmm...I never knew that before....good info..thanks Kris :flop:
Last edited by Wakemeup on Mon Sep 20, 2010 6:28 am, edited 1 time in total.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 8598
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 3:28 am

PostMon Sep 20, 2010 6:19 am » by Kris75



Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1773
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 9:11 am

PostMon Sep 20, 2010 12:47 pm » by Dukettt


There was a mention that this was shot though window. That may explain any anomalies in the vid. I highly recommend to never shoot though the window, degrades quality and makes it impossible to know if the anomalies are in the window or on the object. Keep shooting! For anyone interested in shooting high quality vids and considering buying a cam i recommend to wait for the "four thirds" video cameras because it is possible to mount really massive optics on to those in the future! And 1080p offcourse! And maybe 30-300fps in the future? When someone captures an UFO with one of those it is going to be a hard day for the debunkers...
------------------------------
Image
canubis wrote:
a hill goes up not digs itself into a grave newbie.. lol i made the word LOL in 95 on ms CHAT orels ill be saying ROFLMAO fkn n00b

Initiate
Posts: 928
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 9:04 am

PostMon Sep 20, 2010 9:12 pm » by Wakemeup


dukettt wrote:There was a mention that this was shot though window. That may explain any anomalies in the vid. I highly recommend to never shoot though the window, degrades quality and makes it impossible to know if the anomalies are in the window or on the object. Keep shooting! For anyone interested in shooting high quality vids and considering buying a cam i recommend to wait for the "four thirds" video cameras because it is possible to mount really massive optics on to those in the future! And 1080p offcourse! And maybe 30-300fps in the future? When someone captures an UFO with one of those it is going to be a hard day for the debunkers...

Thanks for the feedback guys and I agree with you 100 percent dukett about filming through glass and anomalies. I ordered a 1.7 teleconverter and that will get me a closer view for next time. I video taped the object in question off my plasma tv to pin point where it is located. :cheers:


Upload to Disclose.tv


Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 8598
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 3:28 am

PostMon Sep 20, 2010 9:31 pm » by Kris75


wakemeup they posted your video on this site
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xevpss ... from=embed

Initiate
Posts: 928
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 9:04 am

PostMon Sep 20, 2010 9:37 pm » by Wakemeup


kris75 wrote:wakemeup they posted your video on this site
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xevpss ... from=embed

Oh...right on! thanks :flop:


PreviousNext

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook