Tutankhamun- the human battery?

Fri Mar 08, 2013 7:32 pm » by **scuba**

Speaking about same culture same source…

Teotihuacán (meaning 'Place of the Gods'- the name is Aztec not Spanish)
Theos-Greek word for God
Teut- ancient Egyptian
Diu- gallic
Diet ( old german)
Deus- latin

Too strange coincidences!

Fri Mar 08, 2013 10:33 pm » by **Stargazer279**

Greetings everyone !

Interesting subject... may i bring some clarifications concerning the Ark of Covenant. This "Device" is actually a box made of wood. On the outside it is gold plated or leafs of gold all around. Inside the box there is gold all over. This box has a cover and follows the same pattern as the box. Now in those times the Ark of Covenant was brought here and there. The sand and wind would actually charge the outside of the box to a very high potential. Enough to stunt any that would touch it. Only the "Initiated" people were able to open this box without getting stunt or killed. In the world of electronics such device actually exist. It is called a capacitor. You can compare a capacitor to a battery up to a certain extent. A charged capacitor will give out electricity until it is discharged. The process will last a fraction of a sec up to several seconds, depending how much you are asking from it.

The "Initiated " were using a branch covered with gold and they were discharging the Ark to the ground before opening it. This had to be done every time they had to carry it all around or to open it.

I hope this will shed a bit of light on why the Ark of Covenant had at the time some mysterious powers.

Cheers !

Sat Mar 09, 2013 12:19 am » by **Rich316**

Stargazer279 wrote:Greetings everyone !

Interesting subject... may i bring some clarifications concerning the Ark of Covenant. This "Device" is actually a box made of wood. On the outside it is gold plated or leafs of gold all around. Inside the box there is gold all over. This box has a cover and follows the same pattern as the box. Now in those times the Ark of Covenant was brought here and there. The sand and wind would actually charge the outside of the box to a very high potential. Enough to stunt any that would touch it. Only the "Initiated" people were able to open this box without getting stunt or killed. In the world of electronics such device actually exist. It is called a capacitor. You can compare a capacitor to a battery up to a certain extent. A charged capacitor will give out electricity until it is discharged. The process will last a fraction of a sec up to several seconds, depending how much you are asking from it.

The "Initiated " were using a branch covered with gold and they were discharging the Ark to the ground before opening it. This had to be done every time they had to carry it all around or to open it.

I hope this will shed a bit of light on why the Ark of Covenant had at the time some mysterious powers.

Cheers !

And you know this how? Have you seen it? held it and used it?
If so great, if not, then you have a theory. Nothing etched in stone here folks, just ideas.

Sat Mar 09, 2013 1:01 am » by **scuba**

Rich316 the tomb of Tutankhamun is real! we have all the pieces. For real! The chemical and electrical phenomena can be replicated! But every experiment has to start with an idea!

Sat Mar 09, 2013 1:21 am » by **Rich316**

but still a good theory, especially the earthing of the device!

Sat Mar 09, 2013 3:24 am » by **Stargazer279**

Rich, when i explain something about electricity or electronics, i know what i am talking about, i have over 20 years of experience in electronics. The Ark of Covenant i have never seen it, nor touched it. However, the principle is there. Electricity more then 2000 years ago or today is behaving the same. You can actually experiment with something similar, and you will see that hot summer dry wind can charge up metal plates easily. This is not fiction , this is real facts. Should you experiment on this, i will warn you of the High Voltage discharge.

Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:00 am » by **Rich316**

Regardless, it is still a story and the problem with age old stories is they get blown out of context time and time again...

Sun Mar 10, 2013 8:39 pm » by **scuba**

I discussed my theory also with an electronics engineer and should work! There were some important pieces of the device that finally I was able to integrate into that theory too. I have more clues on that and I'm creating a blog so I can post more detailed info, pictures, links etc. I will post the blog link here. Unfortunately no one I wrote to on this subject answered back (Christopher Dunn, Carmen Boulter etc).

Sun Mar 10, 2013 9:39 pm » by **Webcat**

Interesting idea scuba :flop:

Tutankhamun's tomb

In 1922 in the Egyptian Valley of the Kings the tomb of Tutankhamun (KV62) was opened by Howard Carter and Lord Carnarvon. Among the artifacts was a processional ark, listed as Shrine 261, the Anubis Shrine. Almost immediately after publication of the photographs[38] of this sensational archaeological find some claimed that the Anubis Shrine could be the Ark of the Covenant. John M. Lundquist, author of The Temple of Jerusalem: past, present, and future (2008), discounts this idea. The Anubis Shrine measures 95 centimetres (37 in) long, 37 centimetres (15 in) wide, 54.3 centimetres (21.4 in) high, in the shape of a pylon. The Biblical Ark of the Covenant is approximately 133 centimetres (52 in) long, 80 centimetres (31 in) wide, and 80 centimetres (31 in) high in the shape of a rectangular chest.

He points out that Shrine 261 is not strictly analogous to the Ark of the Covenant: it can only be said that the Anubis Shrine is "ark-like", constructed of wood, gilded and gessoed, stored within a sacred tomb, "guarding" the treasury of the tomb (and not the primary focus of that environment), that it contains compartments within it that store and hold sacred objects, that it has a figure of Anubis on its lid, and that it was carried by two staves permanently inserted into rings at its base and borne by eight priests in the funerary procession to Tutankhamun's tomb. Its value is the insight it provides to the ancient culture of Egypt. The figure of Anubis itself contradicts any claim that Shrine 261 could be the Ark of the Covenant.

"1922 photograph of the tomb of Tutankhamun. Photograph by Harry Burton (1879-1940)"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ark_of_the_Covenant

Tutankhamun ruled Egypt in ca. 1332–1323 BC, I understand that "Rabbinical Judaism calculated a lifespan of Moses corresponding to 1391–1271 BCE; Jerome gives 1592, and Ussher 1619."

The ark was created within the lifespan of Moses.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moses

If these dates are correct, then the Ark was created a long time after the Ancient Egyptians begain the mummification process, and the rituals (grave goods and techniques) that accompained it, because
The Old Kingdom dates at 2686–2181 BC, therefore the process of mummification has a far earlier time line than the Ark - and so, how do the two relate as power sources, when only the Ark is acredited with 'electricial power' - at a much later date?

There is no mention that the opposite happened - the Ark based on the Egyptian practises, if that was the true purpose of such elaborate burial habits (to conserve/produce energy?).

Therefore the Ancient Egyptians had no idea about the possibilitys of the ARK when the burial/mummification processes came into being - and I would offer that why the 'Ark' in Tutankhamun's tomb caused a stir, was that they are almost contemporary, they would be similar!

Similar minds creating similar objects - a possibility?

But I do like your thinking about the 'energy' aspect of the burials.

Or have I misunderstood your thinking here?

:cheers:

Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:10 pm » by **scuba**

Just some patience please :cheers:

! Is much more then all of that! They knew! The knowledge came from Egypt! They kept this sacred technology under the strict supervision of highly initiated priests. Moses was educated, initiated by them. The energy source in use for the two devices is the same. The environmental, geological conditions were different! I will explain in grater detail my theory on a blog. Historical dates are not an issue. The pyramids are older then 2000 BC and they used the same kind of energy! And Tutankhamun burial complex was more then a capacitor! And the Ark of the Covenant too!