Unlawful killing

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 412
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:14 pm
Location: Gone Fishing!

PostFri Jun 14, 2013 7:29 pm » by Neversaydie


WTF. The video's gone...shit. I was just about to watch that. :bang;

Please could you try and get it back?
Remember this day and prepare yourselves for it is a time of great revealing.
For when it arrives, mankind will finally know the truth about everything.


Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 8940
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:52 pm

PostSat Jun 15, 2013 5:36 am » by Noentry


"The third-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the majority.
The second-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the minority.
The first-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking."
A. A. Milne

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 412
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:14 pm
Location: Gone Fishing!

PostSat Jun 15, 2013 9:24 am » by Neversaydie


Noentry........your a Diamond. Thanks. :flop:
Remember this day and prepare yourselves for it is a time of great revealing.
For when it arrives, mankind will finally know the truth about everything.


Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 8940
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:52 pm

PostSat Jun 15, 2013 1:47 pm » by Noentry


Cia212 wrote:
Noentry wrote:
Cia212 wrote:Do they dispute the facts that the car was speeding and the driver was drunk?


The car was speeding and the driver was not drunk.
His blood showed discrepancies that can only be explained if the blood was tampered with and also their is mention the blood may not of been his at all.
In the court the driver was cleared of any wrong doing.
Cia :cheers:

Which court and who did they blame for the tampered blood? I'd like to read that report. In any case, it's a stretch to clear the driver of wrong doing if he was driving that fast through the city.

I got to the part where Mohamed Al-Fayed spends a lot of time at his son's grave...he really seems beyond distraught.


This is a small part of the Coroners ruling on the verdicts.

Secondly, there is evidence on which the jury could conclude that Henri Paul
had consumed alcohol up to twice the UK drink driving limit. There were real
flaws in the chain of custody of samples and the recording of results by the
French pathologists and toxicologists. Furthermore, the results of tests for
carboxyhaemoglobin were difficult for anyone to explain. On the other hand,
only one of the four experts called to give evidence thought the test results for
alcohol were probably unreliable (as to the other three, see: (i) 22/1/08, p54
(Forrest ‘comfortably satisfied’ as to reliability); (ii) 30/1/08, p158 (Vanezis had
‘nagging doubts’ but preferred not to answer questions about probability); (iii)
31/1/08, p41 (Oliver thought that the combination of toxicology findings was
‘strongly indicative’ that the samples came from Henri Paul)). After they gave
their evidence, further evidence was called which could be regarded as
establishing that the sample tested for carboxyhaemoglobin was matched with
Henri Paul by DNA profiling (see 6/3/08, p124-9). It will be for the jury to
consider all that evidence in the round, and in the context of witness evidence
about Henri Paul’s demeanour at the Ritz and about his medical history. In any
20
event, the toxicological evidence has to be considered in the context of the
whole of the evidence concerning his consumption of alcohol.
44. If the jury formed the view that Henri Paul had drunk something like that amount
of alcohol, they could certainly decide that he had behaved negligently in
choosing to drive a car. Given the speed of events on the approach to the Alma
underpass, it is open to the jury to fi
nd that Henri Paul’s reactions were
impaired and that this contributed to his loss of control of the car.
45. Thirdly, as with the paparazzi, the jury is entitled to take account of the features
of the road environment which pres
ented additional hazards (see above).
46. Overall, while one has to distinguish the supposed negligence of the paparazzi
and the supposed negligence of Henri Paul, there would be something
unrealistic about my determining that one could be viewed as criminal while the
other could not be so viewed. All these drivers were facing the same road
conditions. All were free agents and had the choice to slow down, without any
real adverse consequence

http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov. ... 270308.pdf

The link below is where all the witness transcripts for the case are.
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov. ... ts.gov.uk/

A lot to read but very interesting.



Neversaydie wrote:Noentry........your a Diamond. Thanks. :flop:

Image
"The third-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the majority.
The second-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the minority.
The first-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking."
A. A. Milne

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1096
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 1:21 pm
Location: "In life's litter tray......"

PostSat Jun 15, 2013 5:57 pm » by Webcat


Nice find noentry - booked for watching later! :flop:

:cheers:
Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 8940
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:52 pm

PostSat Jun 15, 2013 6:24 pm » by Noentry


Webcat wrote:Nice find noentry - booked for watching later! :flop:

:cheers:


Yeah its a great documentary on the trial of princess Diana and Dodi's death.
The Jury decided on the harshest verdict they were allowed to choose.
The establishment would only allow the verdict of unlawful killing, I bet if the jury had a choice they would have ruled on murder!
"The third-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the majority.
The second-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the minority.
The first-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking."
A. A. Milne

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 6387
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 10:00 pm
Location: Zin-Uru

PostMon Oct 07, 2013 2:27 am » by Kinninigan


:flop:


I was gonna repost this but found noentrys thread, the OP has been removed and this documentry has been taken down alot of places


HERE IS A FRESH RECENT UPLOAD, ENJOY!

Alot of new stuff going on with this story now..



Unlawful Killing : The Killing of Princess Diana - (2011)


Upload to Disclose.tv


Published on Oct 3, 2013












:flop:
It was written in prophecy that a Gelfling would end Skeksis rule...
Image
https://www.youtube.com/user/kinninigan


Previous

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook