USA GIVES UP CONTROL OF NET; NEW GLOBAL GOVERNANCE

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 13734
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 4:45 pm
Location: Chicago

PostSat Mar 15, 2014 12:13 am » by domdabears


U.S. officials announced plans Friday to relinquish federal government control over the administration of the Internet, a move likely to please international critics but alarm some business leaders and others who rely on smooth functioning of the Web.

Pressure to let go of the final vestiges of U.S. authority over the system of Web addresses and domain names that organize the Internet has been building for more than a decade and was supercharged by the backlash to revelations about National Security Agency surveillance last year.

“The timing is right to start the transition process,” said Lawrence E. Strickling, assistant secretary of commerce for communications and information. “We look forward to ICANN convening stakeholders across the global Internet community to craft an appropriate transition plan.”

The practical consequences of the decision were not immediately clear, but it could alleviate rising global complaints that the United States essentially controls the Web and takes advantage of its oversight role to help spy on the rest of the world.

U.S. officials set strict conditions and an indeterminate timeline for the transition from federal government authority, saying that a new oversight body must be created and win the trust of crucial stakeholders around the world, officials said. An international meeting to discuss the future of Internet is scheduled for March 24, in Singapore.

The announcement essentially ruled out the possibility that the United Nations would take over the U.S. role, something many nations have advocated and U.S. officials have long opposed.

The looming change — if successfully executed — would end or at least dramatically alter the long-running contract between the U.S. Commerce Department and the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, a California-based non-profit group that goes by the acronym ICANN. That contract is due to expire next year but could be extended if the transition plan is not complete.

“I welcome the beginning of this transition process that you have outlined. The global community will be included in full,” said Fadi Chehade, president of ICANN.

Rumors that the U.S. government would step out of its oversight role sparked concerns among those who long have maintained that ICANN did not do enough to protect security online.

“To set ICANN so-called “free” is a very major step that should done with careful oversight,” said Dan Jaffe, executive vice president of the Association of National Advertisers. “We would be very concerned about that step.”

Yet other groups saw the move away from U.S. oversight as inevitable and expressed support for the process if it’s open and embraces the needs of people who use the Internet around the world.
“This is a step in the right direction to resolved important international disputes about how the Internet is governed,” said Gene Kimmelman, president of Public Knowledge, a group that promotes open access to the Internet.

Verizon, one of the world’s biggest Internet providers, issued a statement saying, “A successful transition in the stewardship of these important functions to the global multi-stakeholder community would be a timely and positive step in the evolution of Internet governance.”

ICANN’s most important function is to oversee the assigning of Internet domains — such as .com, .edu and .gov — and ensure that the various companies and universities involved in directing digital traffic do so safely. ICANN is midway through a massive and controversial expansion that is adding hundreds of new domains, such as .book, .gay and .army, to the Internet’s infrastructure.

It long has faced complaints that the highly profitable domain name industry, which sells individual Web addresses for hefty markups, had established practical control over ICANN, to the detriment of other users. Rumors that the U.S. government would relinquish control were enough to alarm some business leaders on Friday.

Chehade addressed such concerns, saying, “Nothing will be done in any way to jeopardize the security and stability of the Internet.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/ ... print.html
I wanna be a Warhol
Displayed on your wall
Still hung up on you

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 5967
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:24 pm
Location: Evildweeb 2.5

PostSat Mar 15, 2014 12:35 am » by Evildweeb


domdabears wrote:U.S. officials announced plans Friday to relinquish federal government control over the administration of the Internet, a move likely to please international critics but alarm some business leaders and others who rely on smooth functioning of the Web.



This smells as bad as dead fish in your lunchbox for 10 days.


domdabears wrote:Verizon, one of the world’s biggest Internet providers, issued a statement saying, “A successful transition in the stewardship of these important functions to the global multi-stakeholder community would be a timely and positive step in the evolution of Internet governance.”



Oh JEEBUS, the LAST people to wave the goody-goody flag.


If the Govt is bailing out this means it's going private contractor, and THAT means better check under yer seats for that flotation device that has been farted into for decades.


:bang;



:peep:


:cheers:


Image
Image

Beer acquisition continues up to the point of some form of saturation and is driven on a course directed by the path of least resistance to the fridge

Super Moderator
Online
User avatar
Posts: 18270
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:20 am
Location: underneath the circumstances

PostSat Mar 15, 2014 1:31 am » by The57ironman


.



.....so...you didn't see that coming..?




















Image
.

.....you can educate the ignorant...but there's no fk'n helping the stupid.

.

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 933
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 11:39 pm

PostSat Mar 15, 2014 1:34 am » by Middleman


This is all about the fact that the Brics nations and a bunch of countries in Europe (including Germany and France) are seriously talking about constructing their own Internets that would be less vulnerable to American spying.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 9937
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 3:24 pm

PostSat Mar 15, 2014 1:38 am » by *WillEase*


domdabears wrote:U.S. officials announced plans Friday to relinquish federal government control over the administration of the Internet...


Really? U.S. officials relinquishing control...really? :bullshit:

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 841
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:41 pm

PostSat Mar 15, 2014 8:09 am » by Bandanko


two things I got from that;

1, .gay and .army were next to each other ;)

2, so its a non profit? well the information and power they would be handed is very profitable. are they seriously thinking of making a new mega corp that runs the web? this will need a regional office in each city, a head office, all countries to fund it, my word thats a lot of power and responsibility just there. plus if they run the web, then cant they ban certain IP's and so forth?

I think I might go look for a job at ICANN soon :flop:

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 644
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 12:37 pm

PostSat Mar 15, 2014 9:51 am » by Tntbw


*WillEase* wrote:
domdabears wrote:U.S. officials announced plans Friday to relinquish federal government control over the administration of the Internet...


Really? U.S. officials relinquishing control...really? :bullshit:


I love the smell of bullshit in the morning, it smells like victory. :bullshit:



  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook