Video Shot by pilot flying Along side several ChemPlanes

Writer
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:42 am

You might like:

PostFri Mar 05, 2010 9:40 pm » by Quebeccanada


I just came back from work,There is a cloudless clear blue sky outside
And then I noticed several chemtrail all lined up together...
And then I come here on DTV and see that post,weird isn't it?

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 124
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:06 pm

PostFri Mar 05, 2010 9:48 pm » by Astrodicted


I know i posted it b4 but its all in there,even the pricetag.....just listen :)

Image

Initiate
Posts: 408
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 3:40 pm

PostFri Mar 05, 2010 10:01 pm » by 1ofakind


quebeccanada wrote:I just came back from work,There is a cloudless clear blue sky outside
And then I noticed several chemtrail all lined up together...
And then I come here on DTV and see that post,weird isn't it?




No, what is weird is me posting earlier that I haven't seen any for a couple of months and then when I go for a walk in the afternoon the sky is covered in them. We can all agree to disagree what the purpose of these are but all everyone of us has to do is look up and we can not deny that they are there. I am pissed of and would like to know why there are fake clouds in the sky when all I keep hearing about is global warming. A relative of mine worked in Saudi Arabia many years ago and when I mentioned chemtrails to him he did not know what I was talking about. Yet he said that they all knew when it was going to rain in Saudi because the King had been on TV telling everyone to pray for rain and not long after that it did. He said that they called it seed clouding which I have heard of but what suprised me is that he was there in the mid 80's. If they were manipulating the weather over 20 years ago then what are they capable of now. If I mention seed clouding to anyone they look at me with a strange face because they think it is science fiction even though it has been going on for years.

jetxvii

PostFri Mar 05, 2010 10:15 pm » by jetxvii


heinousone wrote:If chemtrails are real, I always figured it was probably additives in the fuel. That way the commercial airlines just continue to buy the fuel and then these additives are burned along with the fuel and exhausted into the atmosphere along with any other exhaust. Planes do have exhaust right?

Because the lengths that would have to be gone through to create the infrastructure within a plane to have seperate areas where the chemicals are stored and then released in some other manner is just too complicated.

We all know the Energy Industries are corrupt anyways so who says they are not capable of simply "spiking" the airline fuel?


well I would have to disagree just by the information I have seen. but then if what you say is true then we should be pointing the majority of the finger at the new fuel clouding the skies and trapping all of those green house gases right?

But I do agree that energy companies are corrupt, just don't know why they would be spiking the fuel if it worked in the first place, and I would think that by adding more to the fuel that would cause an increase in the production for the fuel, also what they are adding should be combustible and provide either a cleaner fuel to burn or a better combustion rate...

I don't think alot of the pictures that we see of the interior of planes supposed to be chem planes are real, but whatever they are spraying could be contained in a 20 oz bottle for all we know depending if what they are releasing is a solid that sublimates into a liquid or a liquid that turns into a vapor / vaporization.

the key to all of this is to find out exactly what one of those alleged planes is spraying then you can go from there and how they would fit an airliner with a system for spraying, but since that will never happen this will be a conspiracy until that day happens..

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1541
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 2:45 am

PostFri Mar 05, 2010 10:21 pm » by Wolfbane7272


kanaeta wrote:




Chemtrail Truth

Searching for the truth about chemtrails

http://chemtruth.ning.com/



dude seriously ..that vid rocks ..props to the pilot for giving us a birds eye view of this
Image

Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1541
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 2:45 am

PostFri Mar 05, 2010 10:23 pm » by Wolfbane7272


heinousone wrote:If chemtrails are real, I always figured it was probably additives in the fuel. That way the commercial airlines just continue to buy the fuel and then these additives are burned along with the fuel and exhausted into the atmosphere along with any other exhaust. Planes do have exhaust right?

Because the lengths that would have to be gone through to create the infrastructure within a plane to have seperate areas where the chemicals are stored and then released in some other manner is just too complicated.

We all know the Energy Industries are corrupt anyways so who says they are not capable of simply "spiking" the airline fuel?


lol or poisoning our air even huh? both seem shady and underhanded to me .

cheers
Image

Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1541
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 2:45 am

PostFri Mar 05, 2010 10:26 pm » by Wolfbane7272


shadowkhas wrote:If someone can show me the device that dumps these chemicals continually over the duration of a flight attached on a plane, I will believe you 100% and donate my time to advocating your cause.

I'll be waitin'! :flop:


ha its irrelevant to prove anything to you not being rude but seriously why would anyone have to prove anything .. clearly there are 2 planes stripping our skies with something .. and they aint practicing for the air show lol.
Image

Image

Conspirator
Posts: 1646
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 1:31 am

PostFri Mar 05, 2010 10:51 pm » by Heinousone


jetxvii wrote:
well I would have to disagree just by the information I have seen. but then if what you say is true then we should be pointing the majority of the finger at the new fuel clouding the skies and trapping all of those green house gases right?

But I do agree that energy companies are corrupt, just don't know why they would be spiking the fuel if it worked in the first place, and I would think that by adding more to the fuel that would cause an increase in the production for the fuel, also what they are adding should be combustible and provide either a cleaner fuel to burn or a better combustion rate...

I don't think alot of the pictures that we see of the interior of planes supposed to be chem planes are real, but whatever they are spraying could be contained in a 20 oz bottle for all we know depending if what they are releasing is a solid that sublimates into a liquid or a liquid that turns into a vapor / vaporization.

the key to all of this is to find out exactly what one of those alleged planes is spraying then you can go from there and how they would fit an airliner with a system for spraying, but since that will never happen this will be a conspiracy until that day happens..


Well, in regards to the cost of production of additives, who says they are not being paid to do that then? Kind of like how I figure Media Companies sometimes get paid to NOT run certain stories. I mean...its well known that billions of dollars go "missing" from government expenditures by certain agencies and institutions.

When you talk about what they should be adding, you begin to assume they are rational beings without an agenda that basically spits in the face of rationality. If they want mass quantities of a particular substance sprayed into the air, the easiest and cheapest way to do such is get it into the fuel. Jet fuel purchasing is highly controlled and regulated so they can make sure that the spiked fuel only goes to the airlines and cleaner varieties make it to the testing labs.

jetxvii

PostFri Mar 05, 2010 11:44 pm » by jetxvii


heinousone wrote:
jetxvii wrote:
well I would have to disagree just by the information I have seen. but then if what you say is true then we should be pointing the majority of the finger at the new fuel clouding the skies and trapping all of those green house gases right?

But I do agree that energy companies are corrupt, just don't know why they would be spiking the fuel if it worked in the first place, and I would think that by adding more to the fuel that would cause an increase in the production for the fuel, also what they are adding should be combustible and provide either a cleaner fuel to burn or a better combustion rate...

I don't think alot of the pictures that we see of the interior of planes supposed to be chem planes are real, but whatever they are spraying could be contained in a 20 oz bottle for all we know depending if what they are releasing is a solid that sublimates into a liquid or a liquid that turns into a vapor / vaporization.

the key to all of this is to find out exactly what one of those alleged planes is spraying then you can go from there and how they would fit an airliner with a system for spraying, but since that will never happen this will be a conspiracy until that day happens..


Well, in regards to the cost of production of additives, who says they are not being paid to do that then? Kind of like how I figure Media Companies sometimes get paid to NOT run certain stories. I mean...its well known that billions of dollars go "missing" from government expenditures by certain agencies and institutions.

When you talk about what they should be adding, you begin to assume they are rational beings without an agenda that basically spits in the face of rationality. If they want mass quantities of a particular substance sprayed into the air, the easiest and cheapest way to do such is get it into the fuel. Jet fuel purchasing is highly controlled and regulated so they can make sure that the spiked fuel only goes to the airlines and cleaner varieties make it to the testing labs.


Oh forgive me then I thought you were talking about something way different...

yes I agree, for a second I thought you were talking about them using a new fuel and not a new form of spraying... can't say I have ever thought about them using it in the fuels...

thanks for making me think.

Initiate
Posts: 306
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:32 pm

PostSat Mar 06, 2010 12:08 am » by Shadowkhas


1ofakind wrote:No, what is weird is me posting earlier that I haven't seen any for a couple of months and then when I go for a walk in the afternoon the sky is covered in them. We can all agree to disagree what the purpose of these are but all everyone of us has to do is look up and we can not deny that they are there. I am pissed of and would like to know why there are fake clouds in the sky when all I keep hearing about is global warming. A relative of mine worked in Saudi Arabia many years ago and when I mentioned chemtrails to him he did not know what I was talking about. Yet he said that they all knew when it was going to rain in Saudi because the King had been on TV telling everyone to pray for rain and not long after that it did. He said that they called it seed clouding which I have heard of but what suprised me is that he was there in the mid 80's. If they were manipulating the weather over 20 years ago then what are they capable of now. If I mention seed clouding to anyone they look at me with a strange face because they think it is science fiction even though it has been going on for years.

They probably give you a strange look because it's cloud seeding and not seed cloduing. :mrgreen:

I don't think anybody denies that cloud seeding exists...it's a different process than what people allege chemtrails to be, though.

wolfbane7272 wrote:ha its irrelevant to prove anything to you not being rude but seriously why would anyone have to prove anything .. clearly there are 2 planes stripping our skies with something .. and they aint practicing for the air show lol.

No...it's not "clear." It is an extraordinary claim that requires extraordinary evidence for it to be believable. If you told me right now that you drive a Ferrari, and other people vouched for it, I could believe it without seeing it. It's a rare claim, but not outrageous enough for hearsay to be discredited.

Saying that planes are flying overhead and poisoning us/changing the atmosphere/god knows what requires substantial evidence, not just flawed logic that has been shown time and time again to be flawed. At that point, simply saying that it's "clear" lowers the bar for evidence and research gathering. Saying that proof is irrelevant means that you really have no hard facts supporting your claim, and it's just that: a claim. If you want to get this theory out of conspiracy-land and into the world, you're going to have to find some seriously bulletproof evidence supporting it.

PreviousNext
  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

We are listed at the www.topparanormalsites.com website. Click here to vote for us.. Thank you :-)