Wake-Up Call 09/09/09

Initiate
Posts: 145
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:02 am

PostThu Sep 17, 2009 4:25 am » by Volitzer


Wake-Up Call 09/09/09

In this Issue:

1.
Bus-ting Free - Time to Take Back America
2.
Tell Congress to Pull ACORN Funding & Expand The FBI Investigation!
3.
Resolution Opposing US DOJ's Rejection of Non-Partisan Elections in Kinston, North Carolina
4.
A Compromise on Health Care?
5.
Did We Come out of Bondage to go Full Circle and Return?
6.
Kennedy's Final Partisan Ploy
7.
"Worst Case Senario" - Armed Revolution! Are you “in or out”?
8.

Health care reform means more power for the IRS
9.
Baucus Plan Allows for Fines Up to $3,800 for Failing to Get Health Insurance
10.
Obama-Care Shocker: - Send in the Social Workers


Bus-ting Free - Time to Take Back America

On Thursday, September 10th, the American Liberty tour, a nationwide hands-on effort to organize citizens about the overreach of Big Government today, will be kicking its coast-to-coast efforts in Sacramento, California. It is scheduled to stop in 18 cities across twelve states from California to Georgia until October 13th.

Although it is critical for the American people to express their outrage against an unaccountable government via phone calls, town halls, letters, emails, and protests, these are no longer good enough. Americans for Limited Government is co-sponsoring the tour to bring a new message to Americans: It is time to organize into a viable political movement to take back America.

[Full Story]

http://blog.getliberty.org/default.asp?Display=1544

Second Amendment Foundation

12500 NE 10th Place, Bellevue, WA 98005 Phone: (425) 454-7012 FAX: (425) 451-3959

Tell Congress to Pull ACORN Funding & Expand The FBI Investigation!



YES, I want to help FIGHT Against the "Obama Anti-Gun" Agenda!

Click Here to Preview Fax

ACORN -- the Association of Community Organizations for Reform -- a publicly funded national organization is using your tax dollars to actively interfere with the Second Amendment exercise of gun rights in New Jersey and elsewhere.

ACORN went public with its gun control activism when it intervened in an unsuccessful attempt to defend Jersey City, New Jersey, a hot bed of anti-gun rights extremists, to disarm its citizens with a local gun control ordinance. ACORN pushed for stronger local gun restrictions that were already struck down by the New Jersey state court as a violation of state law.

We need to mobilize folks to take action right away... So we've set up an easy way for you to make your voice heard LOUD AND CLEAR -- you can send "Blast Faxes" to hundreds of U.S. Congressmen AT ONCE, urging that they Pull ACORN Funding and Expand The FBI Investigation.

For about what it would cost you in time and telephone charges, you can send Blast Faxes!

https://secure.conservativedonations.co ... rn/?a=2941

Resolution Opposing US DOJ's Rejection of Non-Partisan Elections in Kinston, North Carolina

by the Constitution Party of North Carolina State Executive Committee
Adopted on August 28, 2009 in Charlotte, NC

7209-J East W.T. Harris Blvd. #119, Charlotte, NC 28227
1-88-VOTE-CPNC • http://www.ballot@constitutionpartync.com

~Resolution~

Whereas, the citizens of Kinston, North Carolina voted to change their municipal elections, by nearly 2 to 1, from Partisan to Non-Partisan elections on Nov 4th 2008; and

Whereas, the US Department of Justice, utilizing Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, wrongfully overturned a voter-initiated and approved referendum, stating it would "reduce the ability of blacks to elect candidates of choice;" and

Whereas, the measure to enact non-partisan elections passed in seven out of nine city precincts, five out of seven majority-black precincts and only narrowly defeated in the other two majority-black precincts; and

Whereas, the US Department of Justice, violated North Carolina sovereignty and the people of Kinston, North Carolina's right to self-government through over encroachment of federal power; and

Whereas, non-partisan elections allow for more candidates to choose from on election day, and therefore be in it

Resolved, that the Constitution Party of North Carolina supports the citizens of Kinston, North Carolina to voice their opinion as "We the People" by choosing to conduct their municipal elections in a non-partisan fashion, that the use of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is, in all cases when used to overturn state or local election laws, an unconstitutional usurpation of State's Rights and overstepping of federal power as delineated in the United States Constitution, and that the Constitution Party of North Carolina condemns all uses of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to overturn voter approved election laws.

Download PDF Version of Resolution


Jim Randleman
Phone
Home (910) 730-0756
Cell (910) 331-1757
Representative Offices
http://www.house.gov/house/MemberWWW_by_State.shtml#nc

Senators Offices
http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_i ... m?State=NC

"The man who achieves makes many mistakes, but he never makes the biggest mistake of all - doing nothing."
-- Benjamin Franklin--


[Full Story]

http://www.kinston.com/news/department- ... iting.html

A Compromise on Health Care?


A Compromise on Health Care?
Democrats are looking for a health care compromise. To win over Republican Sen. Olympia Snowe and possibly other moderates, President Barack Obama is considering a trigger that would create a government-run public insurance option only if private insurers failed to provide affordable coverage. Another idea is to create privately run insurance co-ops.


* CNN: Sen. Snowe Not Afraid to Buck Her Party
* NYT: Health Care Idea Has Public Plan Only as Backup
* The New Republic: What Does Olympia Snowe Want?
* USA Today: Health Insurance Debate Turns to Issue of Co-Ops

[Full Story]
http://www.congress.org/congressorg/home/

Did We Come out of Bondage to go Full Circle and Return?
Larry Davis

In 1776 we came out of Bondage, with Faith, Understanding and Courage. Even against great odds, and with much bloodshed, we battled our way to achieve Liberty.
Liberty is that delicate area between the force of government anf the Freewill of man.

Liberty brings Freedom of choice to work, to trade, to go and live wherever one wishes; it leads to Abundance.

Abundance, if made an end itself, wll result in Complacency which leads to Apathy.

Apathy is the "Let Someone Else Do It" philosophy. This always brings Dependency. For a time, dependents are often not aware they are dependent. They delude themselves by thinking that they are still free. -- "We never had it so good." -- "We can still vote, can't we?"

Eventually, abundance diminishes and Dependency becomes known by it's true nature: Bondage!!!

There are a few ways out of bondage. Bloodshed and War often result, but our Founding Fathers learned of a better way.

Realizing that a Creator is always above and greater than that which He creates, they established a three vote system by which an informed citizenary can control those acting in the name of government.

To be a good master, you must always remember the true "Chain of Command" in this nation:

1. God created man...
2. Man [aka..."We the People" (that's you & I)], created the Constitution...
3. The Constitution created government . . .
4. Government created corporations . . . ect.


The base of power was to remain in "We the People" but unfortunately, it was lost to those leaders acting in the name of government, such as politicians, bureaucrats, judges, lawyers, ect...

As a result, America began to function like a deocracy instead of a republic. A democracy is dangerous because it is a one-vote system opposed to a republic, which is a three-vote system: Three votes to check tyranny, not just one.
(American citizens have not been informed of their other two votes.)
Our 1st Vote is at the polls on election day when we pick those who are supposed to represent us in the seats of government.
"But what can be done if those elected officials just don't perform as promised or expected?"

Well, the second two votes are the most effective means by which the the common people of any nation on earth, have ever had in controlling those appointed to serve in government.
The 2nd Vote comes when you serve on a Grand Jury. Before anyone can be brought to trial for a capital or infamous crime by those acting in the name of government, permission must be obtained from citizens serving on the Grand Jury!
The Minneapolis Star and Tribune in a March 27, 1987 edition noted a purpose of the Grand Jury in this way: "A Grand Jury's purpose is to protect the public from an overzealous prosecutor."
The 3rd Vote is the most powerful vote: This is when you're acting as a jury member during a courtroom trial. At this point, "The buck stops" with you!"
It is in this setting that Each Jouror has More Power than the President, all of Congress, and all the Judges combined!

As a Juror in a trial setting, when it comes to your individual vote of innocent or guilty, you truly are answerable only to God Almighty. The 1st Amendment to the Constitution was born out of this great concept. However, judges of today refuse to inform Jurors of their Rights.

The Minneapolis Star and Tribune in a Novenber 30, 1984 edition, entitled: "What judges don't tell the juries" stated:


"At the time of the adoption of the Constitution, the jury's role as defense against political oppression was unquestioned in American jurisprudence. This nation survived until the 1850's, when prosecutions under the "Fugitive Slave Act" were latgely unsuccessful because juries refused to convict."
"Then judges began to erode the instituion of free juries, leading to the absurd comprimise that is the current state of the law. While courts uniformly state that juries have the power to return a verdict of not guilty whatever the facts, they routinely tell the jurors the opposite."
"Further, the courts will not allow the defendants or their counsel to inform the jurors of their true power. A lawyer who made . . . Hamilton's argument would face professional discipline and charges of contempt of court."
"By what logic should juries have the power to acquit a defendant but no right to know about that power? The court decisions that have suppressed the notion of jury nulification cannot resolve this paradox."
"More than logic has suffered. As originally conceived, juries were to be a kind of safety valve, a way to soften the bureaucratic rigidity of the judicial system by introducing the "Common Sense" of the community. If they are to function effectively as the "Conscience of the Community", jurors must be told that they have the power and right to say No to a prosecution in order to achieve a greater good. To cut jurors off from this information is to undermine one of our most important institutions."
"Perhaps the community should educate itself. Then citizens called for jury duty could teach the judges a needed lesson in civics."


Kennedy's Final Partisan Ploy
by Michael Swartz
When the Massachusetts legislature next convenes it's possible that their very first order of business will be to complete the final chapter in the late Senator Ted Kennedy's legacy and preserve the precious 60-seat majority the Democrats currently hold in the Senate.
The story dates back to 2004. Senator John Kerry became the Democratic nominee for President and during most of that summer it looked like he could unseat the incumbent President Bush. Worried Bay State Democrats fretted about a Massachusetts state law, which allowed the Governor to select a successor if the Senate seat became vacant because at the time Mitt Romney, a Republican, was the state's chief executive. Democrats, spearheaded by the urging of Ted Kennedy, rammed through a new law, which provided the state fills its Senate vacancies solely through a special election. As events played out the new law was rendered moot; however, no one took any steps to change the law back and it remains on the books in Massachusetts.
[Full Story]
http://blog.getliberty.org/default.asp?Display=1542
"Worst Case Senario"
Armed Revolution! Are you “in or out”?
August 29,Saturday, 2009
by Mark Epstein


The great danger in historical revisionism is the potential for future generations to make the same mistake. Abraham Lincoln and Franklin Delano Roosevelt were no friends to the US Constitution, but few Americans know this fact. Even more egregious is the dearth of Constitutional knowledge in America. However, that is changing, which does not bode well for the Obama Administration.



Never in our country’s history have Americans witnessed the travesty of such an anti-constitutional administration and congress. And a great deal of the responsibility falls on both major political parties and the media. However, there are others, including American voters who refuse to intelligently discuss the issues and critically analyze what the administration is doing. As a result, the likelihood of another civil war or second revolution increases with each passing day and each new power-grab by the Obama administration.



This past week, while garnering the largest market share of any news media outlet, Glenn Beck painstakingly analyzed what the Obama administration is really all about and what it is actually doing. There hasn’t been one White House denial. At the end of the week, Beck presented five questions Americans should ask their politicians.. Questions based in our Constitution. Glenn suggested in the strongest terms that Americans ask their political representatives each of the questions and then following-up with the question “Are you in or out?” And if the representative is not on board with the questions, then Americans need to vote them “out” in the 2010 elections.


Although I completely concur with Mr. Beck with respect to his analysis of this administration and the previous one (Beck is no fan of Bush spending, etc.), there are a plethora of reasons America will not make it to the mid-term elections in 2010. The analysis of this potential reality and a possible scenario follows.



The Coming Armed Revolution: Can it be avoided? If not, are you in or out?
Barack Obama, Rahm Emanuel, Reid, Pelosi, Van Jones, and a host of others are making a mockery of our Constitution — and the American people know it.


"People are not buying these concepts that are completely foreign to America. We’re almost reaching a revolution in this country." -- Senator Jim Inhofe

Currently, there are admitted radical Communists serving as Obama’s “czars,” a congressional bill to allow Obama seizure of the internet, and the administration is responsible for nationalization of industry and a blatant attempt to nationalize health care. The Obama administration is engaging in generational warfare and Obama-supporting union members have attacked US citizens participating in Town Hall meetings. There are provisions in Obama’s health care overhaul bill that contain loopholes that will result in health care benefits to illegal aliens, and ACORN registers illegal aliens to benefit the current administration.. The government vilifies citizens, talks of mandatory H1N1 vaccination, and federal tax dollars pour into organizations to enable voter fraud. There is an immoral leftist boycott of one of the world’s most socially-conscious companies occurring, and the Democrats have been involved in silencing critics through physical intimidation, lawsuits, refusal to air commercials, and slander — and the list goes on.

To say the majority of Americans are upset about the country’s direction would be a gross understatement. They are pissed-off and willing to take up arms.
The thought of Americans engaging in armed revolt was unthinkable 12 months ago. After SEIU thugs beat-up a man attending a Town Hall meeting, other Americans showed-up at Town Hall meetings armed with semi-automatic weapons — including a meeting the president attended. There hasn’t been a union “beat down” of a Town Hall attendee since. The message is clear: Tyrants and bullies can be dealt with, even if it’s at the “business end” of a firearm.
Although the federal government is monitoring a number of known militia groups, these groups are not a threat to the government. The current threat to the federal government is the average American who realizes the federal threat to his personal freedoms and to his children’s freedoms and financial solvency. Americans are furious. They are not just angry. Moreover, many realize it may take the forceable removal of the Obama administration, as well as its direct and tacit supporters on both sides of the aisle, to restore our freedoms and sanity to Washington. Therefore, what follows is a “potential” scenario, which in no way should be construed as advocating an armed revolt against the federal government.

The Trigger
It’s difficult to pinpoint a particular spark that could or would ignite another civil war or revolution, but certainly mandatory H1N1 vaccination and presidential seizure of the internet are possibilities. It may even be a terrorist attack that many suspect the administration is setting-up the country for in its grand design to impose a dictatorship on the country. However, regardless of what touches-off the growing powder keg, we do know that (1) once angered, it takes a lot to calm Americans and (2) there would be a great deal of collateral damage.
The First Days
Conceivably, within the first days of an armed revolt, numerous politicians, Obama hacks, federal judges, and media members would be killed. Although the president may order active-duty military forces to supplement local law enforcement, it is doubtful that more than 40% of the military would obey his order to shoot American citizens and most of the military’s trained “gun fighters” are otherwise engaged in overseas combat zones. Additionally, many law enforcement personnel would opt to focus on humanitarian aid for those Americans caught in the crossfire versus taking on a well-armed and determined citizenry. Likewise, Obama could expect little to no support from the governors, as federalizing National Guard troops would not be in a state government’s interest when the focus of the revolt is the federal government. Additionally, it is conceivable that media outlets would be seized to enable communications for those Americans in revolt and voice their demands for a general and unconditional surrender of all politicians — including the president. Undoubtedly, Obama would exacerbate the problem by requesting UN assistance in the form of "foreign soldiers" when his own Soldiers refused to shoot Americans.
The First Week
As the inevitable food and water shortages began within the large urban areas, the administration would be saddled with responding to this crisis. Additionally, with the seizures of transportation routes, medical supplies would quickly be problematic and the wounded would be dying for lack of medical treatment. Although the administration would likely attempt to harness this for political purposes, the non-existence of media in many areas, the lack of internet access, radio, digital television, and the destruction of key emergency networks would stifle the administration’s attempts to coalesce support from those Americans not involved in the armed revolt. In other words, the country’s communications infrastructure would have its weaknesses revealed and these weaknesses would benefit those in revolt. Meantime, from their areas of refuge, the administration would communicate via secure satellite systems in its attempts to re-establish authority.

The Second Week
After a brief lull in the killing, this period would be remembered as the time of purging. Obama supporters would be summarily executed in their homes and on the streets. Since the administration had gone so far as to seek UN assistance, the general American animosity toward the organization would come to the forefront and, again, this would only exacerbate the anger and trigger more bloodshed. By this point, gasoline is either unavailable or in the hands of those in revolt. The economy would have already ground to a halt, public transportation would be useless, and people would be dying from thirst.
The First Month
By this point, the military would be experiencing the highest desertion rate in its history, as active-duty members sought to ensure the safety of their own families or joined the revolt. Local law enforcement and the state’s National Guards would be providing humanitarian assistance only, and their orders would include not firing on armed Americans and using their own firearms only to defend women and children, having already experienced losses themselves for interfering with summary executions of male Obama supporters. Within the administration, the FBI would be vilified for its failure to understand the totality of American opposition to big government, as exemplified by the Obama administration. University professors would now be targeted for killing, economic collapse would be in full view of the world, the first foreign Soldiers would be on American soil and their dead would already be in the process of repatriation to their respective countries. At the local level, those bureaucrats who had exceeded their authority would also be targeted. Certain states would be sealed-off and its citizens refused access to another state. For example, fleeing Californians could expect to be shot at any eastern border, with their only egress point being Interstate 5 into the western half of Oregon. Since there is no gasoline at this point, the exodus would be on foot. Additionally, the country would be effectively split in half, as Americans from North and South consolidated their hold on the middle of the country in preparation for eastward and westward movement to support the warriors prosecuting the revolt in those areas. The urban areas would be in complete chaos as amoral thugs raped, looted, and burned large sections of the cities. Again, local law enforcement would be so busy with trying to protect people and property that they would not have the resources to put down the revolt. Obama could empty the prisons and attempt to arm any inmate who would support him. The upside to this move is that America would rid itself of a large portion of its prison population as these individuals were gunned-down mercilessly.
The First Six Months
In a last desperate bid to maintain power, Obama would extend peace-feelers to the informal government taking shape across the country. However, with the anarchists dead, the cities burned, local, state, and federal human targets neutralized, and its own inner debate ongoing, the revolutionists would only repeat its demand that Obama surrender himself and any remaining members of his administration and congressional representatives in the House and Senate, in order to stand trial. One of the key focal points of the new government would be enacting laws pertaining to those who had prosecuted the administration’s war against the revolution and, unlike the Revolutionary War where Americans held to Christian principles, Obama and his cohorts would face the very real possibility of being tried under new laws resulting from an internal compromise within the revolutionaries to dispense with the very protections Obama and Congress attempted to strip from Americans. In essence, those who had engaged in Washington’s “status quo” could expect no quarter.

The First Year
By this point, the Americans who had participated in the war would be working alongside local law enforcement and National Guard troops to maintain order, repair infrastructure, ensure logistical hubs were operating unfettered, and prosecuting war criminals on both sides of the conflict — including Obama, his cronies, and the current crop of Congressman and Senators. A new government would be in place and the borders with Mexico and Canada would be sealed completely, with illegal entry met with deadly force. Ports along the Gulf Coast would be receiving oil and supplies, debt repayment to the Chinese and Japanese would be in the process of negotiation, the assets of those who opposed the revolution would have been seized and being used to pay survival wages to those engaged in reconstruction efforts, communication infrastructure would be restored, and special tribunals would be enacted to determine the mainstream media’s complicity in triggering the war.
The Next Five Years
In the aftermath of the war, there would be unprecedented change. Lobbying would be outlawed, free speech would be curtailed in the aspect that certain political entities would no longer enjoy a right to exist (Communist Party USA, Nazi Party, Socialists, etc.), and all Americans would be forced to live within their economic means.. Although suspended for the first five years, mortgage payments would resume, but at the current market value of ones home. In other words, banks and large mortgage entities would suffer catastrophic losses on their initial loans. Second Amendment rights would be near sacrosanct and those who had aided and abetted the administration by manipulating media coverage of Obama and Washington would still be enduring trials — and the courts would have the ability to sentence guilty parties to death for the court’s finding the accused had hidden facts from the American people. Churches would also be released from their current constraint on addressing political issues, but radical America-haters like Jeremiah Wright would be tried for treason. Another change to the country’s laws would include executions being carried out by firing squads and a streamlining of the appellate process. Americans in general would return to a time when being a neighbor and helping one another was more important than receiving government largesse. America’s “elitists” would be marginalized or dead (Hollywood, professors, career politicians, etc.), and inner-city youth would be working on public projects for food and shelter, with misbehavior or criminal activity met with summary execution. All “guilty” findings for rape and looting would result in execution, and prisons would house only those currently serving sentences, awaiting trial, or sentenced under a new War Crimes Act. Death Row would be abolished and those that had been awaiting execution would be shot.

Six Years and Beyond
By this point, the dead are buried (approximately 50-70 million), full foreign trade is restored, and true “warriors” command the country’s Title 10 forces. Farms are in the hands of individuals, the free market is established with new regulations, and the people are represented by non-career Congressman and Senators who willingly answer to the people. Those who participated in the revolution have returned home to their families and are re-building their lives, while local law enforcement maintains order. Governors are the backbone of the country’s interstate agreements and the non-essential elements of federal bureaucracy are dismantled (e.g., Department of Education, etc.). The axiom “all politics is local” takes on a new meaning in the country, and Americans actually feel empowered to participate in collective decision making and working with their representatives in D.C. Although the nightmare is far from over (it will take at least another two generations), real hope is restored and people are once again proud of their country and being known as an “American.” Despite the unfortunate sub-war that broke out along racial lines during the revolution, racial tensions are at the lowest they have ever been, because the race-baiters and welfare-pimps are all dead or awaiting execution, and Americans have been universally forced to rebuild alongside their neighbor, regardless of race. Foreign governments that aided and abetted Obama during the war are slowly re-entering normalized relations with the US, and those countries that sent troops to support Obama under the UN mandate had their assets seized to pay for reconstruction, including merchant ships, aircraft, and weapons. Totalitarian regimes around the world are labeled as such by the new American government, and immigration laws are changed to prevent known enemies from attending American universities or entering the country. As a further amendment to Freedom of Religion, those religious entities that refuse to abide by the Constitution and foment sub-cultures and lobby for “religious law” are banned, their assets seized, and said assets distributed to Americans for the “general welfare” — regardless of the recipient’s religious beliefs or lack thereof.
Conclusion
Far fetched? It couldn’t happen here? Maybe and maybe not.

However, it would behoove all of America’s “political class” to recognize that an armed citizenry is not to be trifled with or ignored.

So, Washington, what is it? Are you in or out?
Armed Revolution Part II: Setting Brush Fires
Armed Revolution Part III: “Taking out the Comms”

Obama MUST fire Van Jones or Americans have the “right” to revolt!

NOTE: As of this date, Sat 5 Sept 2009, Van Jones has already RESIGNED. Now, on to the next CZARS in line!

Health care reform means
more power for the IRS
By: Byron York
Chief Political Correspondent
September 2, 2009
A sign identifies the Internal Revenue Service building on Constitution Avenue NW in Washington, D.C., Jan (Bloomberg: Dennis Brack) (Bloomberg)
There's been a lot of discussion about the new and powerful federal agencies that would be created by the passage of a national health care bill. The Health Choices Administration, the Health Benefits Advisory Committee, the Health Insurance Exchange — there are dozens in all.

But if the plan envisioned by President Barack Obama and Congressional Democrats is enacted, the primary federal bureaucracy responsible for implementing and enforcing national health care will be an old and familiar one: the Internal Revenue Service. Under the Democrats' health care proposals, the already powerful — and already feared — IRS would wield even more power and extend its reach even farther into the lives of ordinary Americans, and the presidentially-appointed head of the new health care bureaucracy would have access to confidential IRS information about millions of individual taxpayers.

In short, health care reform, as currently envisioned by Democratic leaders, would be built on the foundation of an expanded and more intrusive IRS.
[Full Story]
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/polit ... 81377.html
Baucus Plan Allows for Fines
Up to $3,800 for
Failing to Get Health Insurance
Posted September 8th, 2009 by xntryk1
FOXNews.com Tuesday, September 08, 2009

Baucus Plan Allows for Fines Up to $3,800 for Failing to Get Health Insurance
The plan from Democratic Sen. Max Baucus of Montana would make health insurance mandatory, just like auto coverage.

Families who fail to get health insurance could be fined up to $3,800 under a health care reform plan proposed by a top Senate negotiator.

Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., who as chairman of the Senate Finance Committee is leading
talks among the "Gang of Six" senators to hammer out a bipartisan compromise, offered
what he described on Tuesday as a "framework" and not a "final product."
[Full Story]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09 ... insurance/



http://www.dailypaul.com/node/106100

Obama-Care Shocker:

Send in the Social Workers

Written by Gregory A. Hession J.D.
Tuesday, 11 August 2009 10:33
Child CryingThe proposed Obama government healthcare bill has a government snitch
network built into it, allowing social workers to gain access to your home
under the pretext of checking on your new baby, or soon-to-be-born baby.
It will result in many many more children being taken from families by state
Child Protective Services agencies.
This is the fulfillment of a long-held dream by child protection agencies to
gain access to homes, without first getting a report of abuse or neglect,
as currently required by law. Mandated visits to homes by government
agents has been a favorite cause of Hillary Clinton, and of the radical bureaucrats running
the U.S. Administration of Children and Families.

This "home invasion" program is found on page 838 of the lengthy bill, in Section 1904,
and it is called the "Home visitation programs for families with young children and families
expecting children."
[Full Story]
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php ... -care/1630



All Items in this color are my own opinions. Items from News Sources are given as Teaser Articles (To protect

copywrites) and you should click on the link to see the [Full Story]. To submitt an article for consideration,

please send to: Davis32208@Hotmail.com Articles on CP Candidates and State-Party Events are welcomed.


If you wish to subscribe to "Wake-Up Call" e-mails, please send an e-mail with your name, state of residence, and prefered

e-mail address to: Subscribe_Wake-Up.Call@Live.com Residents of N.C. please include city.



To unsubscribe from my direct e-mail list, please send an e-mail to: Unsubscribe_Wake-Up.Call@Live.comm I can only remove you from my direct list. If this was forwarded to you, please contact forwarding source.



Permission is granted to forward this e-mail however please use discretion and forward only to those patriots you think would be interested.

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook