Weight of electrons? (atomic question)
Does a positively charged ion weigh differently to a negatively charged ion?
I find it hard to believe that by charging an ion, we are altering it's mass.
But if we charge it, and electrons are added or removed, then they should weigh differently.
If they do weigh differently, how much so?
And can I test it using home made instruments?
I find it hard to believe that by charging an ion, we are altering it's mass.
But if we charge it, and electrons are added or removed, then they should weigh differently.
If they do weigh differently, how much so?
And can I test it using home made instruments?
- Stratosfear

-
- Posts: 932
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 9:40 pm
One way of measuring the mass of an atom is by using mass spectrometer (pretty expensive I would have thought). You could use Avagadro's number as well: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avogadro_constant
Positive and negative ions will have a slightly different weight due to protons and electrons. For most basic experiments or theory, atomic mass units are used for weight in which if you really wanted to, you can get a an actually metric or US weight out of it.
A proton will weight approx. 1 amu (atomic mass unit). In most calculations, an electron's weight is generally viewed as negligible. In actual weight terms its close to 1/10000 of the weight of a proton.
When you add a proton, the charge will be positive and thus creating a slightly heavier substance. Of course, subtract one, it will be negative and lighter.
If you were to add or remove an electron, you would have a negative or positive charge respectively and no discernible change in weight.
Generally changing the charge will not change the weight due to the fact that its due to an exchange in electrons. Electrons will be more likely to move to another atom due to the fact they are on the outside of the nucleus and are exposed to gammas and electromagnetic fields in which can provide enough energy for escape or due to valance levels, atoms and molecules will attract or push away electrons depending on their properties.
Protons can be added or removed due to elastic scattering in which a particle, usually a neutron will knock out a proton causing a change in charge and weight.
Don't quote me on this. I am too lazy to look this up to absolutely verify this information and I am working off my memory of physics classes.
A proton will weight approx. 1 amu (atomic mass unit). In most calculations, an electron's weight is generally viewed as negligible. In actual weight terms its close to 1/10000 of the weight of a proton.
When you add a proton, the charge will be positive and thus creating a slightly heavier substance. Of course, subtract one, it will be negative and lighter.
If you were to add or remove an electron, you would have a negative or positive charge respectively and no discernible change in weight.
Generally changing the charge will not change the weight due to the fact that its due to an exchange in electrons. Electrons will be more likely to move to another atom due to the fact they are on the outside of the nucleus and are exposed to gammas and electromagnetic fields in which can provide enough energy for escape or due to valance levels, atoms and molecules will attract or push away electrons depending on their properties.
Protons can be added or removed due to elastic scattering in which a particle, usually a neutron will knock out a proton causing a change in charge and weight.
Don't quote me on this. I am too lazy to look this up to absolutely verify this information and I am working off my memory of physics classes.
Well, there is also the idea that protons are singularities, thus having the mass of the entire universe in each one.
It almost seems to good to be true, and I know there are some far reaching ideas in this paper:
http://theresonanceproject.org/pdf/schw ... ton_a4.pdf
It almost seems to good to be true, and I know there are some far reaching ideas in this paper:
http://theresonanceproject.org/pdf/schw ... ton_a4.pdf
-
- Related topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- Correspondence From The Sub-Atomic To The Galaxy
by malogg » Tue Feb 14, 2012 9:33 am - 1 Replies
- 243 Views
- Last post by svaha

Tue Feb 14, 2012 12:19 pm
- Correspondence From The Sub-Atomic To The Galaxy
-
- IBM Takes First 3D Image of Atomic Bonds
by spliffffstar » Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:22 pm - 5 Replies
- 278 Views
- Last post by dboyseeker

Thu Aug 27, 2009 11:38 pm
- IBM Takes First 3D Image of Atomic Bonds
-
- Atomic Movement During Photosynthesis Photographed With X-Ra
by kingz » Tue May 11, 2010 2:16 am - 0 Replies
- 144 Views
- Last post by kingz

Tue May 11, 2010 2:16 am
- Atomic Movement During Photosynthesis Photographed With X-Ra
-
- The “Atomic Clock” vs simultaneous time.
by 2020 » Mon May 07, 2012 10:15 pm - 0 Replies
- 53 Views
- Last post by 2020

Mon May 07, 2012 10:15 pm
- The “Atomic Clock” vs simultaneous time.
-
- Big bang flashgun to snap atomic anatomy
by marduk2012 » Tue Oct 13, 2009 3:29 am - 2 Replies
- 237 Views
- Last post by marduk2012

Tue Oct 13, 2009 3:49 am
- Big bang flashgun to snap atomic anatomy


