Whats the real reason we haven't been back to the Moon?

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 7596
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:34 pm

PostMon Oct 18, 2010 8:22 pm » by Flecktarn


because they been found out ,,if they went then with crap tec ,,,why not go back with modern tec ,,,,they cant ,,,,,and with google earth we all know what nevada desert looks like now :nwo:
ImageImage

Initiate
Posts: 518
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 7:10 pm

PostMon Oct 18, 2010 8:27 pm » by Aquarius


hackjames wrote:
oxize wrote:Van Allen Belt..


Sorry, what now? Are you bringing it up in the context of the claimed space vehicle's inadequate shielding?


I think he was. It sounds like you have knowledge that the VH belt was not an issue as they have developed shielding against the radiation. Can you confirm, I'm just curious.
God is a comedian, playing to an audience that is afraid to laugh

Master Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 10082
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Packing my stuff and moving to Denver like you should be doing

PostMon Oct 18, 2010 8:35 pm » by Savwafair2012


good post sav.
.

Wait What??? a Complement from YOU JET!!!

Are you feeling okay?
:think:

I read some place that the Apollo mission's passed thru the VA radiation belt at its thinnest portion (above the Artic) and that the actual time it took the space capsule to pass thru it was relatively quick, the amount of radiation was very minimal. Almost like defrosting something in the Microwave very low level's
Image
FAIR USE NOTICE.
Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, . http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Writer
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 5:43 am

PostMon Oct 18, 2010 8:52 pm » by Mizzy


stophaarp wrote:
mizzy wrote:Interesting, I always thought the reason NASA never returned because of other reasons. Money. Plus the fact they already won the space race. Also that there is nothing else to research there because all it is, is a chunk of rock. haha



Already won the space race? What, does space end at the moon?

Also, I highly doubt any celestial body is just a chunk of rock. =P ( besides, the moon is made of cheese! lol)


I meant the space race with the soviet union. :hmmm:

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 495
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:30 pm
Location: Philadelphia

PostMon Oct 18, 2010 9:01 pm » by Stophaarp


mizzy wrote:
stophaarp wrote:
mizzy wrote:Interesting, I always thought the reason NASA never returned because of other reasons. Money. Plus the fact they already won the space race. Also that there is nothing else to research there because all it is, is a chunk of rock. haha



Already won the space race? What, does space end at the moon?

Also, I highly doubt any celestial body is just a chunk of rock. =P ( besides, the moon is made of cheese! lol)


I meant the space race with the soviet union. :hmmm:


haha Yeah I know. I was just being an ass. I always hated the concept of space race... There's no finish line, no end to space that we can see.. merely getting into our immediate space isn't in my mind a win at all... in my mind atleast.
http://atmospherepunch.blogspot.com Blog
http://whatsherfacephoto.weebly.com Portfolio

Initiate
Posts: 518
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 7:10 pm

PostMon Oct 18, 2010 9:04 pm » by Aquarius


Maybe we never left. What about the shuttle that was supposed to crash into the moon to discover water that had already been discovered. That was blatantly a supply shuttle of some sort.
God is a comedian, playing to an audience that is afraid to laugh

Conspirator
Posts: 1729
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:14 am

PostMon Oct 18, 2010 10:29 pm » by Hackjames


aquarius wrote:
hackjames wrote:
oxize wrote:Van Allen Belt..


Sorry, what now? Are you bringing it up in the context of the claimed space vehicle's inadequate shielding?


I think he was. It sounds like you have knowledge that the VH belt was not an issue as they have developed shielding against the radiation. Can you confirm, I'm just curious.


No, sorry, not claiming any knowledge, just clarifying.

I have read/watched a bit about it. I don't trust NASA for some of the reasons posted all over this site, but this in particular seems irrelevant to me. If they went, there's nothing to say that they would have necessarily died (we still don't know a great deal about this effect, as noted by others), and if they didn't go it doesn't mean that we've not gone since because of this effect.

That's all just based on my understanding of it, of course. Anything could be true as far as I'm concerned, though I would probably guess that the moon landing didn't happen, or that it did happen but that's not what we saw. The conditions concerning the broadcast itself are what first caught my attention, and there are many anomalies that have been given little or no attention from NASA to date.
This is your world. You're the creator.
-Bob Motherfucking Ross

Master Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 10583
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 3:08 am

PostMon Oct 18, 2010 10:33 pm » by Boondox681


they never went to begin with.
and yes,because of the radiation belts+other
Image
"Doing stuff is overrated.Like Hitler.He did a lot.But don't we all wish he woulda' just stayed home and gotten stoned?"

Conspirator
Posts: 1729
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:14 am

PostMon Oct 18, 2010 11:35 pm » by Hackjames


boondox681 wrote:they never went to begin with.
and yes,because of the radiation belts+other


Well, thanks for clearing that up. Could you explain what source/sources led you to believe that?
This is your world. You're the creator.
-Bob Motherfucking Ross

Initiate
Posts: 518
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 7:10 pm

PostMon Oct 18, 2010 11:35 pm » by Aquarius


Sorry, what now? Are you bringing it up in the context of the claimed space vehicle's inadequate shielding?


I think he was. It sounds like you have knowledge that the VH belt was not an issue as they have developed shielding against the radiation. Can you confirm, I'm just curious.


No, sorry, not claiming any knowledge, just clarifying.

I have read/watched a bit about it. I don't trust NASA for some of the reasons posted all over this site, but this in particular seems irrelevant to me. If they went, there's nothing to say that they would have necessarily died (we still don't know a great deal about this effect, as noted by others), and if they didn't go it doesn't mean that we've not gone since because of this effect.

That's all just based on my understanding of it, of course. Anything could be true as far as I'm concerned, though I would probably guess that the moon landing didn't happen, or that it did happen but that's not what we saw. The conditions concerning the broadcast itself are what first caught my attention, and there are many anomalies that have been given little or no attention from NASA to date.


The reason for my curiosity is simply down to the fact that the Russians were handing the US it's ass on a plate when it came to space exploration, and the only way that NASA could save face was to put a man on the moon. The Russians claimed that it was because of this radiation belt that they hit a wall when attempting to get a man to the moon. Now there is massive debate as to whether anyone actually reached the moon from earth.

However I do believe that the moon is inhabited. By whom or what I do not know. Nazis probably. :nwo:
God is a comedian, playing to an audience that is afraid to laugh


PreviousNext

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook