Who Built the Moon?

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 9348
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:08 pm

PostThu May 12, 2011 6:04 pm » by Freeyourmindnow



Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 9348
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:08 pm

PostThu May 12, 2011 6:35 pm » by Freeyourmindnow


i love these theory's

part 2


Upload to Disclose.tv


Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 11429
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 12:57 pm
Location: Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin

PostSat May 14, 2011 4:54 pm » by -Marduk-


Interesting stuff, Freeyourmindnow!
Image
______________________________________________________________________________
-= PREDESTINATION: Itz hard to be ze good guy when you turn into a fucking gun =-

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 4007
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 9:03 pm

PostSat May 14, 2011 5:07 pm » by Rydher


I haven't watched this but I will for the entertainment factor. This stuff is pretty interesting even though I don't believe it. I know not all planets have a moon but the vast majority do. Seems the odds are heavily in favor of earth have a moon naturally.

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 11429
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 12:57 pm
Location: Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin

PostSat May 14, 2011 5:18 pm » by -Marduk-


rydher wrote:I haven't watched this but I will for the entertainment factor. This stuff is pretty interesting even though I don't believe it. I know not all planets have a moon but the vast majority do. Seems the odds are heavily in favor of earth have a moon naturally.

Give this book a try then (Click on the image):

Image
Image
______________________________________________________________________________
-= PREDESTINATION: Itz hard to be ze good guy when you turn into a fucking gun =-

Initiate
Posts: 193
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 5:34 pm

PostSat May 14, 2011 5:36 pm » by Istvan12


I haven't watched the video yet but think it will be interesting whether I belive it or not, but one major question that I have always asked and have heard others ask is that why are all the pictures taken of the moon from the same side? is it because that one full rotation around the earth is exactly one full moon rotation? if so what is the possability that the rotation of the moon and the time it takes to travel around the earth to be exactly the same? anyone have the actual answer or theories?

Master Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 10583
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 3:08 am

PostSat May 14, 2011 5:39 pm » by Boondox681


I haven't watched this but I will for the entertainment factor. This stuff is pretty interesting even though I don't believe it. I know not all planets have a moon but the vast majority do. Seems the odds are heavily in favor of earth have a moon naturally.

you are correct,my friend,but show me another one that does not rotate on it's axis.
Image
"Doing stuff is overrated.Like Hitler.He did a lot.But don't we all wish he woulda' just stayed home and gotten stoned?"

Writer
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 5:18 pm

PostSat May 14, 2011 5:40 pm » by Shmortimusprime


Very interesting!

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2359
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:43 pm

PostSat May 14, 2011 5:42 pm » by Electrobadgr


rydher wrote:I haven't watched this but I will for the entertainment factor. This stuff is pretty interesting even though I don't believe it. I know not all planets have a moon but the vast majority do. Seems the odds are heavily in favor of earth have a moon naturally.

Yes but the size of our moon is inconsistent with every other known planet of our size and its accompanying satelite, out moon is anomalous is virtually every respect:
http://spiritualdeepdish.wordpress.com/ ... oon-facts/
1. Moon’s Age:

Is much older than previously expected and maybe even older than the Earth or even the Sun. Earth’s age is estimated to be 4.6 billion years old at the most by some scientists – while various moon rocks were dated at 5.3 billion years old. What’s more puzzling is that the dust upon which they were resting was at least another billion years older.
2. Rock’s Origin:

The chemical composition of the dust below the rocks differs remarkably from the rocks themselves. This excludes the possibility that the dust resulted from the weathering rocks themselves. Where did the rocks come from? Somewhere else?
3. Heavier Elements on Surface:

On Earth and the composition of other planets, the heavier elements are normally found in the core while the lighter materials are concentrated at the surface. But not so with the moon. The abundance of refractory elements like titanium in the surface areas is so pronounced, that several geologists proposed that the refractory compounds must have been brought to the moon’s surface in great quantity in some unknown way. They are adamant. They don’t know how, but there is no other way for this to have happened!
4. Water Vapour:

On the 7th March 1971, lunar instruments that were positioned on the moon by the astronauts recorded a cloud of water vapour passing across the surface of the moon. The cloud covered an area of about 100 square miles and lasted 14 hours.
5. Magnetic Rocks:

Moon rocks are magnetised. This is very strange because there is no magnetic field on the moon itself. And it could not have originated from a “lose call” with Earth because such an encounter would have ripped the moon apart.
6. No Volcanoes:

Some of the moon’s craters originated internally, yet there is no indication that the moon was ever hot enough to produce volcanic eruptions.
7. Moon Mascons:

Mascons are large, dense, circular masses, lying twenty to forty miles beneath the centres of each of the moon’s large maria (dried crater-like ocean beds). Some scientists suggest that these are broad, disk-shaped objects, that could even be some kind of artificial constructions. Huge circular disks would not appear perfectly centred beneath each huge mare by coincidence or accident, they claim.
8. Seismic Activity:

Hundreds of “moonquakes” are recorded each year that cannot be attributed to meteor strikes. In November 1958, Soviet astronomer Nikolay A. Kozyrev of the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory photographed a gaseous eruption of the moon near the crater Alphonsus. He also detected a reddish glow that lasted for about an hour. In 1963, astronomers at the Lowell Observatory also saw reddish glows on the crests of ridges in the Aristarchus region.

What is really fascinating about these events, is that they were observed to be identical in their activity and they occur precisely and periodically, repeating themselves as the moon moves closer to Earth. These are probably not natural phenomena.
9. Hollow Moon:

The moon’s mean density is 3.34 gm/cm3 (3.34 times an equal volume of water) whereas the Earth’s mean density is 5.5. What does this mean? In 1962, NASA scientist Dr. Gordon MacDonald stated, “If the astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that the interior of the moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere.”

Nobel chemist Dr. Harold Urey suggested the moon’s reduced density is because of large areas inside the moon where is “simply a cavity.”

MIT’s Dr. Sean C. Solomon wrote, “the Lunar Orbiter experiments vastly improved our knowledge of the moon’s gravitational field… indicating the frightening possibility that the moon might be hollow.”

In Carl Sagan’s work Intelligent Life in the Universe, the famous astronomer stated, “A natural satellite cannot be a hollow object.”
10. Moon Echoes:

On the 20th November 1969, the crew of Apollo 12 jettisoned the lunar module ascent stage causing it to crash onto the moon some 40 miles from the Apollo 12 landing site. This created an artificial moonquake with startling characteristics. The moon reverberated like a bell for more than an hour. This phenomenon was intentionally repeated with Apollo 13, when they allowed the third stage to impact the moon. The results were even more startling. Seismic instruments recorded that the reverberations lasted for three hours and twenty minutes and travelled to a depth of twenty-five miles. This lead to the conclusion that the moon has an unusually light, or even no core.
11. Unusual Metals:

The moon’s crust is much harder than presumed. The astronauts encountered extreme difficulty when they tried to drill into the maria. The maria is composed primarily ilmenite, which is a mineral containing large amounts of titanium, the same metal used to fabricate the hulls of deep-diving submarines and the skin of the SR-71 “Blackbird”. What is even more puzzling, was the discovery of Uranium 236 and Neptunium 237 in lunar rocks (elements not found in nature on Earth). And a further surprise was finding rustproof iron particles. What?
12. Moon’s Origin:

Before the moon rocks conclusively disproved all the common theories about the moon’s origins, these were some of the theories.

The moon was believed to have originated when a chunk of Earth broke off eons ago (who knows from where, if the materials are not the same?).

Another theory was that the moon was created from leftover “space dust” remaining after the Earth was created. Analysis of the composition of moon rocks disproved this theory also.

Another popular theory is that the moon was somehow “captured” by the Earth’s gravitational attraction. But no scientific evidence exists to support this theory. Isaac Asimov stated, “It’s too big to have been captured by the Earth. The chances of such a capture having been effected and the moon then having taken up a nearly circular orbit around our Earth, are too small to make such an eventuality credible.”
13. Weird Orbit:

Our moon does not rotate on its axis. We only ever see one side of the moon. There is what is known as the “dark side of the moon” that we have never seen from Earth. It is the only moon in the solar system that has a stationary, near-perfect circular orbit. Stranger still, the moon’s centre of mass is about 6000 feet closer to the Earth than its geometric centre (which should cause wobbling), but the moon’s bulge is on the far side of the moon, away from the Earth. “Something or someone” had to put the moon in orbit with its precise altitude, course, and speed.
14. Moon Diameter:

How does one explain the “coincidence” that the moon is just the right distance, coupled with just the right diameter, to completely cover the sun during an eclipse? Again, Isaac Asimov responds, “There is no astronomical reason why the moon and the sun should fit so well. It is the sheerest of coincidences, and only the Earth among all the planets is blessed in this fashion.”
15. Spaceship Moon Theory:

As outrageous as it may sound, it is quite possible that the moon is a giant, intelligently designed spaceship, with a specific purpose. The facts lead us convincingly to such an insane conclusion. The only theory that is supported by all of the data, is that the moon is a gigantic extraterrestrial craft, brought here eons ago by intelligent beings, and there is no data that seems to contradict this theory.
"People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but *actually* from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint - it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly. time-y wimey... stuff." - The Doctor

Writer
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 8:27 pm

PostSat May 14, 2011 5:48 pm » by Iwokeup2009


I watched this interview 2 weeks ago and it was great!

I love David icke he may be a bit of a looney toon but he does have some valid and some seriously interesting theories got my mind racing after i watched this

I have always been fascinated by the moon and
how mysterious it seems its hard to believe that it is just a rock in space.

marduk2012 thanks for posting that book i never herd of it before looks interesting.


Next

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook