Why Do Nasa Release Fake Pictures?

Conspirator
Posts: 1544
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 7:18 pm

PostSun Oct 20, 2013 6:01 pm » by Doogle


Take a look at this picture from the Lunar Orbiter 3 mission from around 1967.

Nevermind the formation that looks like a craft of some sort in the larger crater. Why the fakery in the rest of the picture?

Image

Original -
image 3073 at http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/lunar ... mission/?3

Master Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 10136
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 3:24 pm

PostSun Oct 20, 2013 6:12 pm » by *WillEase*


They don't. :hell:
If there was something NASA wanted to hide, they simply wouldn't release the image publicly.
They have been known to doctor images or crop out things they don't want us to see, but for the most
part NASA is not concerned with conspiracy theories or people like me.
That's the reason so many anomalies have been found. :alien:
PEACE, PEACE...BUT THERE IS NO PEACE!

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 110
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 10:47 pm

PostSun Oct 20, 2013 6:15 pm » by Synkronizer


*WillEase* wrote:They don't. :hell:
If there was something NASA wanted to hide, they simply wouldn't release the image publicly.
They have been known to doctor images or crop out things they don't want us to see, but for the most
part NASA is not concerned with conspiracy theories or people like me.
That's the reason so many anomalies have been found. :alien:


:clapper: :cheers:
"The adult public's taste is not necessarily ready to accept the logical solutions to their requirements if the solution
implies too vast a departure from what they have been conditioned into accepting as the norm." - Raymond Loewy

Conspirator
Posts: 1544
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 7:18 pm

PostSun Oct 20, 2013 10:37 pm » by Doogle


*WillEase* wrote:They don't. :hell:
If there was something NASA wanted to hide, they simply wouldn't release the image publicly.
They have been known to doctor images or crop out things they don't want us to see, but for the most
part NASA is not concerned with conspiracy theories or people like me.
That's the reason so many anomalies have been found. :alien:


I don't get it Will. Doctoring is faking isn't it? Point taken about the anomalies just waiting to be discovered but maybe some of them are let through deliberately - not an opinion I hold onto strongly, more a passing thought.
The pic above, well OK it's old so maybe it's more reflective of the Nasa of old, but it is clearly two separate landscapes. If you enlarge it and take a look, the horizon is a dead cert fake. Or did Nasa have nothing to do with these particular pics?

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2119
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 9:15 am
Location: Cornwall U.K.

PostSun Oct 20, 2013 11:09 pm » by Temps13


:peep: Well theres probably several different labs involved..
Those straight lines look suspicious..the truth will come out whether they try to hide it or not..it's already discernible to those that look :look:
Image Image
IRMENSUL13

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2948
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 10:47 am

PostThu Feb 20, 2014 12:10 am » by Opalserpent


Ukraine scientists break down fakery used to create lunar imagery. :flop:

http://www.aulis.com/stereoparallax.htm

Full article with evidence in above link.

Study Conclusion

Professor of University of California G. Schiller has noted: "To be successful, manipulation should remain invisible. The success of the manipulation is guaranteed when the manipulated believe that everything happens naturally and inevitably. In short, manipulation requires a false reality in which its presence will not be felt". Very often this false reality is amplified by the media.

In the convergence of these Apollo 15 pictures, more than a million equations (the number of pixels in the images) were calculated obeying the laws of optics. In order to obtain a zero stereoscopic effect for a remote landscape, typical distortion grids were generated around the photographic session sites.

Numerous Apollo 15 photo examples indicate an identical distortion grid – a projection screen at the distance of 100-120 metres from the front of the studio stage. A serious falsification of the true lunarscape, in particular, an artificial trench 30-60 metres in width given for the lunar Rima Hadley which is actually 1,200 metres in width; the image of this remote lunarscape being projected onto the curved background screen; and ‘astronaut’ photographers taking pictures in front of it in a studio set.

The Apollo 15 photographic record contradicts the stereoscopic parallax verification method. The apparent change in the relative positions of objects by moving the camera when the camera angles are separated by several tens of cms show that:
the distance to distant objects such as mountains is not tens of kilometres but is no more
than a few hundred metres;
the landscape is not continuous, but with clear lines of separation;
there is movement between nearby sections of the panorama relative to other sections.
Thus, based on the above examples, this study concludes that the Apollo 15 photographic record does NOT depict real lunarscapes with distant backgrounds located more than a kilometre away from the camera.

These pictures were, without doubt, taken in a studio set – up to 300 metres in size. A complex panorama mimicking the lunarscape shows degrees of movement, such as horizontal and vertical changes to give an impression of imaginary distance to the objects and perspective.

Dr Oleg Oleynik
English translation from the Russian by BigPhil


About the Author

From 1984 to 1993 — Dr Oleg Oleynik graduated from the Physics and Technology Department (Phystech) of the Kharkov State University. He obtained a Master’s degree in physics in physical metallurgy.
From 1993 to 1999 — was a senior engineer, scientific assistant, postgraduate student, and a Soros postgraduate student.

In 1999 Oleg successfully graduated from the Phystech postgraduate school, obtained his Ph.D.c specializing in experimental nuclear physics and the physics of charged particle beams at the Physics and Technology Department of the Kharkov State University.


Image

Image

Image

This confirms the previous finding that the ‘lunar’ mountain backscape was projected onto a forward-tilted, slightly convex, circular panorama background screen.
Image
Live by the Terror, Die by the Terror.

Master Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 10833
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 3:08 am

PostThu Feb 20, 2014 12:17 am » by Boondox681


why?
Image
Image
"Doing stuff is overrated.Like Hitler.He did a lot.But don't we all wish he woulda' just stayed home and gotten stoned?"

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 186
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:22 pm

PostThu Feb 20, 2014 1:02 am » by theegle


Boondox681 wrote:why?
Image





The Moon is a huge star ship, and they, the Gods are there. Not only is this moon are in our solar system.


the-moon-is-the-planet-nibiru-the-anunnaki-are-still-here?


the-moon-is-the-planet-nibiru-the-anunnaki-are-still-here-t90309.html

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 425
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 7:47 pm

PostThu Feb 20, 2014 2:07 am » by pushtone


Why Do Nasa Release Fake Pictures?

because they know that the vast majority of people prefer Cornelius over Roddy McDowall :wink:


Upload to Disclose.tv




they can also show you the truth - but you'll be so busy looking for Cornelius - that you won't notice Roddy.

just like this - NASinine image on "Mars"

http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/pia17931-main_m34-sol528-wb.jpg


to it's far left are a number of distinct damp rivulets that suggest recent water flow but - then it couldn't be Mars - unless Cornelius was already embedded - then anything's possible.....apart from Roddy :lol:


Taken from Nasa image.


Image

:wink:
Last edited by pushtone on Thu Feb 20, 2014 2:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
- - -

"If we take eternity to mean not infinite temporal duration but timelessness, then eternal life belongs to those who live in the present.

Ludwig Wittgenstein.



  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook