Willease's Space Anomalies

[Deuem Profile]

Hi Will, I don't know if you are up and running at full speed but I have a favor to ask. Can you jump on my thread and see what magic you can do with Duketts UFO. I am open to you thoughts. I would have used the PM but it is still not working for me.
Deuem

Second, we are all waiting for some more Anomalies. Get going!!!!!!!!

[Will69ease Profile]

Are These UFOs Spotted By NASA Astronauts Actually Alien Spaceships?

Upload to Disclose.tv

Did the Atlantis astronauts see UFOs in 2006? According to this NASA video and audio, yes, yes they did. Watch them spotting not one but three UFOs in front of them and telling Houston about it...
"It's a structure that's definitely not rigid. Doesn't look like anything I've ever seen on the outside of the Shuttle, that's for sure...it quickly moved to the nose of the orbiter, moving away at least 100 feet."
You can actually see them on the last part of the video. What are they?
Fast forward to 1:00 to start hearing the astronaut talking about the objects. They spot three metallic objects. Houston replies that it's probably just a reflection on the lenses, but the astronauts reply that they are definitely solid.

Does this mean the UFOs are alien spaceships? Of course not. That's just stupid. They are just some Unidentified Flying Objects.

But hey, NASA's mission control recordings are always a riot when you are an ufologist. Astronauts see some piece of metallic fabric? ALIENS! Astronauts see some trash moving in orbit? ALIENS! Astronauts had to go poop in their infernal poop machine? Aliens? ALIENS!

The truth is that this is just space crap. It just should be tracked because it may be dangerous for the mission—which is why the orbiter has windows and the astronauts have eyes and binoculars. It is business as usual. But, for some reason, ufologists just try to perch everything on the little green men.

Which is stupid because everyone knows that the little green men use cloaking devices.

[Mumin Profile]

So... We're never going to know?
we will have to wait until we get a ride on one of these "structures"

[Will69ease Profile]

So... We're never going to know?
we will have to wait until we get a ride on one of these "structures"

I'm afraid so. Here's another cool video to ponder...
[youtube]7994uWOLEtw&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]

[Yuya63 Profile]

Did NASA run out of pics? Or, are you just taking a break? Been waiting for more Will.

[Toxic32 Profile]

So... We're never going to know?
we will have to wait until we get a ride on one of these "structures"

I'm afraid so. Here's another cool video to ponder...
[youtube]7994uWOLEtw&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]

I like that video as well..Not like you post without links to the original will?

[Toxic32 Profile]

will is there any new pics of the space Anomalie dubbed the black knight ?

Holy crap, talk about a flash from the past...
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/artic ... 45,00.html

What is the "Black Knight" satellite? It is a mysterious satellite, of unknown origin, discovered in 1960 which shadowed Sputnik. It is believed to have been of extraterrestrial origin, and signaled back old radio waves from the 1920s and 1930s before it disappeared. In short wave patterns analyzed by astronomer Duncan Lunan, it revealed its origin as Epsilon Boötes (or the star system as it was 13,000 years ago).

In "Disneyland of the Gods", by John Keel, he reports in depth on this satellite:

"In February 1960 the US detected an unknown object in polar orbit, a feat that neither they or the USSR had been able to accomplish. As if that wasn't enough, it apparently was several sizes larger than anything either country would have been able to get off the ground.

And then, the oddness began. HAM operators began to receive strange coded messages. One person in particular said he managed to decode one of the transmissions, and it corresponded to a star chart. A star chart which would have been plotted from earth 13,000 years ago, and focused on the Epsilon Bostes star system.

On September 3, 1960, seven months after the satellite was first detected by radar, a tracking camera at Grumman Aircraft Corporation's Long Island factory took a photograph of it. People on the ground had been occasionally seeing it for about two weeks at that point. Viewers would make it out as a red glowing object moving in an east-to-west orbit. Most satellites of the time, according to what little material I've been able to find on the black knight satellite, moved from west-to-east. It's speed was also about three times normal. A committee was formed to examine it, but nothing more was ever made public.

Three years later, Gordon Cooper was launched into space for a 22 orbit mission. On his final orbit, he reported seeing a glowing green shape ahead of his capsule, and heading in his direction. It's said that the Muchea tracking station, in Australia, which Cooper reported this too was also able to pick it up on radar traveling in an east-to-west orbit. This event was reported by NBC, but reporters were forbidden to ask Cooper about the event on his landing. The official explanation is that an electrical malfunction in the capsule had caused high levels of carbon dioxide, which induced hallucinations."

Now, I haven't been able to find reports on this satellite from any news source, but given the recently discovered photos from Russian satellite footage and the stories regarding unknown objects that the early US astronauts saw, I'm inclined to believe this satellite existed. However, the question is its origin- was it a secret US military project, an artifact from earlier in history, or extraterrestrial? The evidence is insufficient to determine the answer.
An interesting blog about it can be found here:
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/49ufo_file ... llite.html

Just came across this adds a little more to the satellite story.

Monday, Mar. 07, 1960
Time Magazine

Three weeks ago, headlines announced that the U.S. had detected a mysterious "dark" satellite wheeling overhead on a regular orbit. There was nervous speculation that it might be a surveillance satellite launched by the Russians, and it brought the uneasy sensation that the U.S. did not know what was going on over its own head. But last week the Department of Defense proudly announced that the satellite had been identified. It was a space derelict, the remains of an Air Force Discoverer satellite that had gone astray. The dark satellite was the first object to demonstrate the effectiveness of the U.S.'s new watch on space. And the three-week time lag in identification was proof that the system still lacks full coordination and that some bugs still have to be ironed out.

First Sighting. The most important component of the space watch went into operation about six months ago with the construction of "Dark Fence," a kind of radar trip wire stretching across the width of the U.S. Designed by the Naval Research Laboratory to keep track of satellites whose radios are silent, it is a notable improvement on other radars, which have difficulty finding a small satellite unless they know where to look. Big, 50-kw. transmitters were established at Gila River, near Phoenix, Ariz, and Jordan Lake, Ala., spraying radio waves upward in the shape of open fans. Some 250 miles on either side, receiving stations pick up signals that bounce off any object passing through the fans. By a kind of triangulation, the operators can make rough estimates of the object's speed, distance and course.

On Jan. 31 Dark Fence detected two passes of what seemed to be an unknown space object. After detecting several passes during the following days, Captain W. E. Berg, commanding officer of Dark Fence, decided that something was circling overhead on a roughly polar orbit. He raced to the Pentagon and in person reported the menacing stranger to Chief of Naval Operations Arleigh Burke. Within minutes the news was communicated to President Eisenhower and marked top secret.

In the confusion, there was a delay before anyone took the step necessary to positively identify the strange satellite: informing the Air Force's newly established surveillance center in Bedford, Mass. It is the surveillance center's job to take all observations on satellites from all friendly observing centers, both optical and electronic, feed them into computers to produce figures that will identify each satellite, describe its orbit and predict its behavior. Says one top official, explaining the cold facts of the space age: "The only way of knowing that a new satellite has appeared is by keeping track of the old ones."

It took two weeks for Dark Fence's scientists to check back through their taped observations, and to discover that the mysterious satellite had first showed up on Aug. 15. The Air Force surveillance center also checked its records to provide a list of everything else that was circling in the sky, and its computers worked out a detailed description of the new object's behavior. The evidence from both Air Force and Navy pointed to Discoverer V, fired from Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif, on Aug. 13.

[Will69ease Profile]

So... We're never going to know?
we will have to wait until we get a ride on one of these "structures"

I'm afraid so. Here's another cool video to ponder...
[youtube]7994uWOLEtw&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]

I like that video as well..Not like you post without links to the original will?

I didn't make the video, thus I don't have links to the original footage. I will do some research and see
what I can come up with. Nice addition to the "black Knight" story by the way. My guess, it is NASA's first attempt at covering up the truth. At the time, sputnic was the only satellite in orbit so I don't believe their explanation.

[Will69ease Profile]

STS093-701-22
http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/scripts/sseop/Q ... 093-701-22

[Toxic32 Profile]

It feels like DTV2 has thrown the baby out with the water and some how lost it's sole! I always though if it ain't broke then don't fix it. I need to see something that feels right familiar on the front page. Hope you don't mind me bumping your thread? Any more to add will.