You honestly believe your government is on your side???
- Torofamily

-
- Posts: 2836
- Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 7:23 pm
- Location: The beach
You might like:
Shocking Admission on Killing Civilians by Top US General Almost Completely Ignored by Corporate Media
Rory O’Connor
AlterNet
April 2, 2010
http://www.alternet.org/media/146251/shocking_admission_on_killing_civilians_by_top_us_general_almost_completely_ignored_by_corporate_media
President Obama’s sneak visit to Afghanistan this weekend, although shrouded in secrecy, still received lots of prime press coverage.
At the same time, an astonishing open admission of possible US war crimes by Obama’s man on the ground in Kabul, senior American and NATO commander in Afghanistan General Stanley A. McChrystal, was reported by Richard A. Oppel Jr. in the New York Times… and then promptly ignored by the rest of the mainstream media.

“We have shot an amazing number of people, but to my knowledge, none has ever proven to be a threat,” McChrystal said during a recent video-conference to answer questions from troops in the field about civilian casualties.
full story
http://www.alternet.org/media/146251/shocking_admission_on_killing_civilians_by_top_us_general_almost_completely_ignored_by_corporate_media
I'm proud to be an American just like our pres


sorry about the links in my sig dtv administration seems to not want them to link to the sights
Rory O’Connor
AlterNet
April 2, 2010
http://www.alternet.org/media/146251/shocking_admission_on_killing_civilians_by_top_us_general_almost_completely_ignored_by_corporate_media
President Obama’s sneak visit to Afghanistan this weekend, although shrouded in secrecy, still received lots of prime press coverage.
At the same time, an astonishing open admission of possible US war crimes by Obama’s man on the ground in Kabul, senior American and NATO commander in Afghanistan General Stanley A. McChrystal, was reported by Richard A. Oppel Jr. in the New York Times… and then promptly ignored by the rest of the mainstream media.
“We have shot an amazing number of people, but to my knowledge, none has ever proven to be a threat,” McChrystal said during a recent video-conference to answer questions from troops in the field about civilian casualties.
full story
http://www.alternet.org/media/146251/shocking_admission_on_killing_civilians_by_top_us_general_almost_completely_ignored_by_corporate_media
I'm proud to be an American just like our pres
sorry about the links in my sig dtv administration seems to not want them to link to the sights
WE ARE THE GLOBAL POLITICAL AWAKENING!
- Mediasorcerer

-
- Posts: 6314
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 4:06 pm
- Location: coast
you know they care,thats why there are so many laws ,to protect us,come on,its unthinkable,your government loves you,
with the power of soul,anything is possible
with the power of you,anything that you wanna do
with the power of you,anything that you wanna do
Hell no.
_____________________________________________

Have quit "The Game". The one that most do not have a clue even exist.
http://www.disclose.tv/Gostrider/
_____________________________________________

Have quit "The Game". The one that most do not have a clue even exist.
http://www.disclose.tv/Gostrider/
The War FOR Truth began on 9112001.
"Truth Digest" http://gostrider.000a.biz/td/td.htm
"Truth Digest" http://gostrider.000a.biz/td/td.htm
How could any American trust a government that has literally declaired war upon them. The Dem and Reps are kickin up a pointless shit storm between themselves , while Sarah Palin and company are Tea Baggin the both of them. "Reload" says Sarah " This Is The Next Revolution" exclaims the ultimate American Whore, it's still a pig! Now we have the Coffe Party against everthing the Tea baggers want. All I want to know is how I can join in on the next America, if there is to be one, after a hard night of Tea Baggin I enjoy a cup of Coffee! 

Anything of interest always comes at ones expense.
The next war is TRUTH, not killing, unlike stupit government's wars...
http://hubpages.com/hub/TruthRevolution
_______________________________________________

Have quit "The Game". The one that most do not have a clue even exist.
http://www.disclose.tv/Gostrider/
http://hubpages.com/hub/TruthRevolution
_______________________________________________

Have quit "The Game". The one that most do not have a clue even exist.
http://www.disclose.tv/Gostrider/
The War FOR Truth began on 9112001.
"Truth Digest" http://gostrider.000a.biz/td/td.htm
"Truth Digest" http://gostrider.000a.biz/td/td.htm
- Truthseeker

- Posts: 1544
- Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 1:36 pm
Kristol: ‘Better’ for US to attack Iran than if Israel did
David Edwards & Gavin Dahl – RAW STORY April 5, 2010
The Obama administration should be seriously considering a strike on Iran, according to neoconservative Fox News contributor Bill Kristol.
An Israeli Deputy Defense Minister said last week that he expected Israel would have to attack Iran within a year. Kristol believes it would be better for the US to attack first.
"I think we have to have a credible threat of force and the preparation to use force against Iran. It would be much better if we used force against – to delay the Iranian nuclear program than if Israel did and there is no evidence that the US government is being at all serious about the use force there," Kristol told Fox News' Chris Wallace Sunday.
Nina Easton, also appearing on the Fox News Sunday panel, quickly rebuked Kristol. "Use of force. You say that so blithely as if use of force – what happens to next day after the use of force?" she asked. "I think it behooves us to get the international community together. You have to have sanctions and you have to have a clear threat of force."
The narrow range of debate on Fox News varied only slightly from sanctions and threatening force to launching a US-led war on Iran. Easton said she would also like to see the Obama administration "curry dissent" in Iran.
Kristol's trigger-finger was too itchy to keep his views in the holster.
"Look, precisely because the consequences are so serious whether we use force or Israel uses force, a serious and responsible US government must think that through and play that out," he responded. "I would say the Obama administration is so adverse to even hinting at the use of force that we don't have the kinds of preparations we should have if Israel were to strike."
This video is from Fox's Fox News Sunday, broadcast April 4, 2010.
Source: http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0404/kristo ... li-strike/
Printer friendly version Email this article to a friend
Last updated 05/04/2010
David Edwards & Gavin Dahl – RAW STORY April 5, 2010
The Obama administration should be seriously considering a strike on Iran, according to neoconservative Fox News contributor Bill Kristol.
An Israeli Deputy Defense Minister said last week that he expected Israel would have to attack Iran within a year. Kristol believes it would be better for the US to attack first.
"I think we have to have a credible threat of force and the preparation to use force against Iran. It would be much better if we used force against – to delay the Iranian nuclear program than if Israel did and there is no evidence that the US government is being at all serious about the use force there," Kristol told Fox News' Chris Wallace Sunday.
Nina Easton, also appearing on the Fox News Sunday panel, quickly rebuked Kristol. "Use of force. You say that so blithely as if use of force – what happens to next day after the use of force?" she asked. "I think it behooves us to get the international community together. You have to have sanctions and you have to have a clear threat of force."
The narrow range of debate on Fox News varied only slightly from sanctions and threatening force to launching a US-led war on Iran. Easton said she would also like to see the Obama administration "curry dissent" in Iran.
Kristol's trigger-finger was too itchy to keep his views in the holster.
"Look, precisely because the consequences are so serious whether we use force or Israel uses force, a serious and responsible US government must think that through and play that out," he responded. "I would say the Obama administration is so adverse to even hinting at the use of force that we don't have the kinds of preparations we should have if Israel were to strike."
This video is from Fox's Fox News Sunday, broadcast April 4, 2010.
Source: http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0404/kristo ... li-strike/
Printer friendly version Email this article to a friend
Last updated 05/04/2010
-
- Related topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- The darker side of London
by domdabears » Wed May 04, 2011 3:36 pm - 2 Replies
- 234 Views
- Last post by tuor10

Wed May 04, 2011 8:16 pm
- The darker side of London
-
- The dark side of Facebook
by gloomylunatic » Sat Mar 03, 2012 5:01 pm - 1 Replies
- 230 Views
- Last post by 99socks

Sat Mar 03, 2012 5:13 pm
- The dark side of Facebook
-
- Side effects of Tamiflu can kill
by ihaveseen » Mon Jul 27, 2009 2:15 am - 0 Replies
- 94 Views
- Last post by ihaveseen

Mon Jul 27, 2009 2:15 am
- Side effects of Tamiflu can kill
-
- the Ugly Side of the Entertainment Industry
by anuki » Sun Jun 06, 2010 6:59 pm - 3 Replies
- 1185 Views
- Last post by boondox681

Sun Jul 25, 2010 6:18 pm
- the Ugly Side of the Entertainment Industry
-
- Rare Colour WW2 Combat German side
1, 2by exoatmospheric1 » Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:19 am - 12 Replies
- 1144 Views
- Last post by aragajag

Fri Mar 19, 2010 11:24 am
- Rare Colour WW2 Combat German side



