11 Comment
Please rate:

Worse than SOPA: New CISPA cybersecurity bill will censor the Web

Worse than SOPA: New CISPA cybersecurity bill will censor the Web

April 5, 2012 - There's a fantastic line between offensive and hilarious, and Arizona lawmakers purpose to make that boundary legally safeguarded. If House Bill 2549 passes, online harassment could turn out to be a criminal offense – but some hacktivists are there to assist you rejoice.

The us's most potent protest teams are joining forces to warn elected officials that they will be held accountable for their actions. The marketing campaign is called Our Polls and its getting introduced with help from each Anonymous and the Occupy movement.

Don't be amazed if much more courtroom bailiffs phone for a small blue hen to consider the stand.

Prosecutors in New Zealand denied bail for Kim Dotcom, also recognized as Kim Schmitz, on Monday, and mentioned that the founder of the file sharing site Megaupload would have to continue being in federal custody as he prepares for a authorized battle.


The official web site for the US Federal Bureau of Investigation is the latest target in a massive online attack against the two the authorities and entertainment market.

If you see the White House invaded by aliens, blown up by laser beams or bombed by terrorists in any of the huge summer time blockbusters this year, contemplate it a refined trace to the Oval Office by way of Hollywood.

Protesters show against the proposed Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and Protect IP Act (PIPA) exterior the places of work of U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) and U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) on January 18, 2012 in New York City (AFP Photo / Mario Tama)

(fifty seven.



( via rt.com )



11 comments

  • Squellett#

    Squellett wrote February 11, 2014 9:38:13 PM CET

    sorry for the repeated messages. it was taking too long so kept tapping the button. Sorry

  • Squellett#

    Squellett wrote February 11, 2014 9:37:09 PM CET

    You need to get together and support my alternative voting system; which is called 'Deductible Voting' which is the power to take back your vote when your politician does something you dont like !
    Look for it on AVAAZ and Care2petition.com and other websites.
    I was looking at the HM Gov ePetition website and noted that what this was, was essentially a Barometer of Public Feelings and Opinion.

    With that idea in mind I decided to try and see if I could work this out as an Actual System of Voting in Real Time.

    I considered, that over a period of, at the end of say; one month, every month ,’a Politician who had already been Elected ;would be re-subjected to not just peoples voting intentions but their ACTUAL ADJUSTED or Non-Adjusted Vote. This might simply be a deductible vote of up top three times per month.

    Why 3 times only? Because for reasonable counting and logging adjustment purposes, and some degree of stability, there needs to be a limitation.

    The idea here is to give the voting public real-time control over their Politicians, on a real time every day basis!

    IN FACT, The Voting Public could recast their votes over the original votes or deduct them accordingly at any time of their choosing up to the last day of the month. On that last day the votes would be recounted and compared to what they were before, and added or deducted from the next candidate in line.

    If the new votes cast were such that the one who had taken the seat before now became a loser rather than a winner; then the one with the most votes would be reinstated into the previous winners place in office.
    One month’s notice would be given to the sitting MP and during that time no ‘New’ powers or policies could be pursued at that time.

    If no major adjustment of places took place during the voting month; then the respective parties would simply take their places based upon their votes now cast.

    This Real-Time Voting measure would give direct control back to the voting populace. It would be as if they were the bosses giving jobs to those who they chose based upon their performance and their original intentions.

    The Politicians would then, either need to readjust their voting intentions in Parliament, or be sacked by the electorate who may have adjusted their last vote cast so as to reflect their new opinion and Parliamentary Member.

    People who have died would still be counted for that month only but those people eligible to vote now would be allowed a vote straight away.
    This voting ability could be proven by a Registered ‘Token’ CARD. or Image and Number of the Voters choosing so that he / she had immediate copyright, and thus could not be duplicated because no-one but them would know the number or image. They would simply be sealed and registered against the Politicians name.

    You could for example write; ‘ I am voting for; ‘’’’’’’’’’’ as of date ‘’’’’’’’and provide your own photo on the same paper with your thumbprint and signature, OR an encrypted Code that only you possess.
    When you take back your vote; you simply request it back either by computer or by letter.

    What’s the point I hear you say ; and would it be practical?
    The point is that today we have no control over our Politicians once they get elected. I want to make them continually responsible, answerable and accountable, just as any employed person would be working for an employer.
    The practicality of it is indeed possible. It just needs some tweaking.
    The politicians would hate it of course and would do their best to stop it before it started but if you were to have Barometrical Political Candidates at Voting time with that Voting Agenda as their main party Policy it might stand a chance.
    I admit the idea is radical and many voters would n’t like it to begin with but the Government do n’t ask us when they change voting boundaries nor with ballot voting changes with 1st, 2nd, 3rd Party Preferences do they?
    You could limit voters changes to about 3 times in a month if you wished; just to obtain some settlements.
    This idea could be tested online with a game but with real Politician’s names re-arranged.

    ( i.e Click Negg. Cavid Dameron, Bed Alls etc )

  • Squellett#

    Squellett wrote February 11, 2014 9:37:07 PM CET

    You need to get together and support my alternative voting system; which is called 'Deductible Voting' which is the power to take back your vote when your politician does something you dont like !
    Look for it on AVAAZ and Care2petition.com and other websites.
    I was looking at the HM Gov ePetition website and noted that what this was, was essentially a Barometer of Public Feelings and Opinion.

    With that idea in mind I decided to try and see if I could work this out as an Actual System of Voting in Real Time.

    I considered, that over a period of, at the end of say; one month, every month ,’a Politician who had already been Elected ;would be re-subjected to not just peoples voting intentions but their ACTUAL ADJUSTED or Non-Adjusted Vote. This might simply be a deductible vote of up top three times per month.

    Why 3 times only? Because for reasonable counting and logging adjustment purposes, and some degree of stability, there needs to be a limitation.

    The idea here is to give the voting public real-time control over their Politicians, on a real time every day basis!

    IN FACT, The Voting Public could recast their votes over the original votes or deduct them accordingly at any time of their choosing up to the last day of the month. On that last day the votes would be recounted and compared to what they were before, and added or deducted from the next candidate in line.

    If the new votes cast were such that the one who had taken the seat before now became a loser rather than a winner; then the one with the most votes would be reinstated into the previous winners place in office.
    One month’s notice would be given to the sitting MP and during that time no ‘New’ powers or policies could be pursued at that time.

    If no major adjustment of places took place during the voting month; then the respective parties would simply take their places based upon their votes now cast.

    This Real-Time Voting measure would give direct control back to the voting populace. It would be as if they were the bosses giving jobs to those who they chose based upon their performance and their original intentions.

    The Politicians would then, either need to readjust their voting intentions in Parliament, or be sacked by the electorate who may have adjusted their last vote cast so as to reflect their new opinion and Parliamentary Member.

    People who have died would still be counted for that month only but those people eligible to vote now would be allowed a vote straight away.
    This voting ability could be proven by a Registered ‘Token’ CARD. or Image and Number of the Voters choosing so that he / she had immediate copyright, and thus could not be duplicated because no-one but them would know the number or image. They would simply be sealed and registered against the Politicians name.

    You could for example write; ‘ I am voting for; ‘’’’’’’’’’’ as of date ‘’’’’’’’and provide your own photo on the same paper with your thumbprint and signature, OR an encrypted Code that only you possess.
    When you take back your vote; you simply request it back either by computer or by letter.

    What’s the point I hear you say ; and would it be practical?
    The point is that today we have no control over our Politicians once they get elected. I want to make them continually responsible, answerable and accountable, just as any employed person would be working for an employer.
    The practicality of it is indeed possible. It just needs some tweaking.
    The politicians would hate it of course and would do their best to stop it before it started but if you were to have Barometrical Political Candidates at Voting time with that Voting Agenda as their main party Policy it might stand a chance.
    I admit the idea is radical and many voters would n’t like it to begin with but the Government do n’t ask us when they change voting boundaries nor with ballot voting changes with 1st, 2nd, 3rd Party Preferences do they?
    You could limit voters changes to about 3 times in a month if you wished; just to obtain some settlements.
    This idea could be tested online with a game but with real Politician’s names re-arranged.

    ( i.e Click Negg. Cavid Dameron, Bed Alls etc )

  • Squellett#

    Squellett wrote February 11, 2014 9:37:07 PM CET

    You need to get together and support my alternative voting system; which is called 'Deductible Voting' which is the power to take back your vote when your politician does something you dont like !
    Look for it on AVAAZ and Care2petition.com and other websites.
    I was looking at the HM Gov ePetition website and noted that what this was, was essentially a Barometer of Public Feelings and Opinion.

    With that idea in mind I decided to try and see if I could work this out as an Actual System of Voting in Real Time.

    I considered, that over a period of, at the end of say; one month, every month ,’a Politician who had already been Elected ;would be re-subjected to not just peoples voting intentions but their ACTUAL ADJUSTED or Non-Adjusted Vote. This might simply be a deductible vote of up top three times per month.

    Why 3 times only? Because for reasonable counting and logging adjustment purposes, and some degree of stability, there needs to be a limitation.

    The idea here is to give the voting public real-time control over their Politicians, on a real time every day basis!

    IN FACT, The Voting Public could recast their votes over the original votes or deduct them accordingly at any time of their choosing up to the last day of the month. On that last day the votes would be recounted and compared to what they were before, and added or deducted from the next candidate in line.

    If the new votes cast were such that the one who had taken the seat before now became a loser rather than a winner; then the one with the most votes would be reinstated into the previous winners place in office.
    One month’s notice would be given to the sitting MP and during that time no ‘New’ powers or policies could be pursued at that time.

    If no major adjustment of places took place during the voting month; then the respective parties would simply take their places based upon their votes now cast.

    This Real-Time Voting measure would give direct control back to the voting populace. It would be as if they were the bosses giving jobs to those who they chose based upon their performance and their original intentions.

    The Politicians would then, either need to readjust their voting intentions in Parliament, or be sacked by the electorate who may have adjusted their last vote cast so as to reflect their new opinion and Parliamentary Member.

    People who have died would still be counted for that month only but those people eligible to vote now would be allowed a vote straight away.
    This voting ability could be proven by a Registered ‘Token’ CARD. or Image and Number of the Voters choosing so that he / she had immediate copyright, and thus could not be duplicated because no-one but them would know the number or image. They would simply be sealed and registered against the Politicians name.

    You could for example write; ‘ I am voting for; ‘’’’’’’’’’’ as of date ‘’’’’’’’and provide your own photo on the same paper with your thumbprint and signature, OR an encrypted Code that only you possess.
    When you take back your vote; you simply request it back either by computer or by letter.

    What’s the point I hear you say ; and would it be practical?
    The point is that today we have no control over our Politicians once they get elected. I want to make them continually responsible, answerable and accountable, just as any employed person would be working for an employer.
    The practicality of it is indeed possible. It just needs some tweaking.
    The politicians would hate it of course and would do their best to stop it before it started but if you were to have Barometrical Political Candidates at Voting time with that Voting Agenda as their main party Policy it might stand a chance.
    I admit the idea is radical and many voters would n’t like it to begin with but the Government do n’t ask us when they change voting boundaries nor with ballot voting changes with 1st, 2nd, 3rd Party Preferences do they?
    You could limit voters changes to about 3 times in a month if you wished; just to obtain some settlements.
    This idea could be tested online with a game but with real Politician’s names re-arranged.

    ( i.e Click Negg. Cavid Dameron, Bed Alls etc )

  • Squellett#

    Squellett wrote February 11, 2014 9:37:06 PM CET

    You need to get together and support my alternative voting system; which is called 'Deductible Voting' which is the power to take back your vote when your politician does something you dont like !
    Look for it on AVAAZ and Care2petition.com and other websites.
    I was looking at the HM Gov ePetition website and noted that what this was, was essentially a Barometer of Public Feelings and Opinion.

    With that idea in mind I decided to try and see if I could work this out as an Actual System of Voting in Real Time.

    I considered, that over a period of, at the end of say; one month, every month ,’a Politician who had already been Elected ;would be re-subjected to not just peoples voting intentions but their ACTUAL ADJUSTED or Non-Adjusted Vote. This might simply be a deductible vote of up top three times per month.

    Why 3 times only? Because for reasonable counting and logging adjustment purposes, and some degree of stability, there needs to be a limitation.

    The idea here is to give the voting public real-time control over their Politicians, on a real time every day basis!

    IN FACT, The Voting Public could recast their votes over the original votes or deduct them accordingly at any time of their choosing up to the last day of the month. On that last day the votes would be recounted and compared to what they were before, and added or deducted from the next candidate in line.

    If the new votes cast were such that the one who had taken the seat before now became a loser rather than a winner; then the one with the most votes would be reinstated into the previous winners place in office.
    One month’s notice would be given to the sitting MP and during that time no ‘New’ powers or policies could be pursued at that time.

    If no major adjustment of places took place during the voting month; then the respective parties would simply take their places based upon their votes now cast.

    This Real-Time Voting measure would give direct control back to the voting populace. It would be as if they were the bosses giving jobs to those who they chose based upon their performance and their original intentions.

    The Politicians would then, either need to readjust their voting intentions in Parliament, or be sacked by the electorate who may have adjusted their last vote cast so as to reflect their new opinion and Parliamentary Member.

    People who have died would still be counted for that month only but those people eligible to vote now would be allowed a vote straight away.
    This voting ability could be proven by a Registered ‘Token’ CARD. or Image and Number of the Voters choosing so that he / she had immediate copyright, and thus could not be duplicated because no-one but them would know the number or image. They would simply be sealed and registered against the Politicians name.

    You could for example write; ‘ I am voting for; ‘’’’’’’’’’’ as of date ‘’’’’’’’and provide your own photo on the same paper with your thumbprint and signature, OR an encrypted Code that only you possess.
    When you take back your vote; you simply request it back either by computer or by letter.

    What’s the point I hear you say ; and would it be practical?
    The point is that today we have no control over our Politicians once they get elected. I want to make them continually responsible, answerable and accountable, just as any employed person would be working for an employer.
    The practicality of it is indeed possible. It just needs some tweaking.
    The politicians would hate it of course and would do their best to stop it before it started but if you were to have Barometrical Political Candidates at Voting time with that Voting Agenda as their main party Policy it might stand a chance.
    I admit the idea is radical and many voters would n’t like it to begin with but the Government do n’t ask us when they change voting boundaries nor with ballot voting changes with 1st, 2nd, 3rd Party Preferences do they?
    You could limit voters changes to about 3 times in a month if you wished; just to obtain some settlements.
    This idea could be tested online with a game but with real Politician’s names re-arranged.

    ( i.e Click Negg. Cavid Dameron, Bed Alls etc )

  • Squellett#

    Squellett wrote February 11, 2014 9:37:05 PM CET

    You need to get together and support my alternative voting system; which is called 'Deductible Voting' which is the power to take back your vote when your politician does something you dont like !
    Look for it on AVAAZ and Care2petition.com and other websites.
    I was looking at the HM Gov ePetition website and noted that what this was, was essentially a Barometer of Public Feelings and Opinion.

    With that idea in mind I decided to try and see if I could work this out as an Actual System of Voting in Real Time.

    I considered, that over a period of, at the end of say; one month, every month ,’a Politician who had already been Elected ;would be re-subjected to not just peoples voting intentions but their ACTUAL ADJUSTED or Non-Adjusted Vote. This might simply be a deductible vote of up top three times per month.

    Why 3 times only? Because for reasonable counting and logging adjustment purposes, and some degree of stability, there needs to be a limitation.

    The idea here is to give the voting public real-time control over their Politicians, on a real time every day basis!

    IN FACT, The Voting Public could recast their votes over the original votes or deduct them accordingly at any time of their choosing up to the last day of the month. On that last day the votes would be recounted and compared to what they were before, and added or deducted from the next candidate in line.

    If the new votes cast were such that the one who had taken the seat before now became a loser rather than a winner; then the one with the most votes would be reinstated into the previous winners place in office.
    One month’s notice would be given to the sitting MP and during that time no ‘New’ powers or policies could be pursued at that time.

    If no major adjustment of places took place during the voting month; then the respective parties would simply take their places based upon their votes now cast.

    This Real-Time Voting measure would give direct control back to the voting populace. It would be as if they were the bosses giving jobs to those who they chose based upon their performance and their original intentions.

    The Politicians would then, either need to readjust their voting intentions in Parliament, or be sacked by the electorate who may have adjusted their last vote cast so as to reflect their new opinion and Parliamentary Member.

    People who have died would still be counted for that month only but those people eligible to vote now would be allowed a vote straight away.
    This voting ability could be proven by a Registered ‘Token’ CARD. or Image and Number of the Voters choosing so that he / she had immediate copyright, and thus could not be duplicated because no-one but them would know the number or image. They would simply be sealed and registered against the Politicians name.

    You could for example write; ‘ I am voting for; ‘’’’’’’’’’’ as of date ‘’’’’’’’and provide your own photo on the same paper with your thumbprint and signature, OR an encrypted Code that only you possess.
    When you take back your vote; you simply request it back either by computer or by letter.

    What’s the point I hear you say ; and would it be practical?
    The point is that today we have no control over our Politicians once they get elected. I want to make them continually responsible, answerable and accountable, just as any employed person would be working for an employer.
    The practicality of it is indeed possible. It just needs some tweaking.
    The politicians would hate it of course and would do their best to stop it before it started but if you were to have Barometrical Political Candidates at Voting time with that Voting Agenda as their main party Policy it might stand a chance.
    I admit the idea is radical and many voters would n’t like it to begin with but the Government do n’t ask us when they change voting boundaries nor with ballot voting changes with 1st, 2nd, 3rd Party Preferences do they?
    You could limit voters changes to about 3 times in a month if you wished; just to obtain some settlements.
    This idea could be tested online with a game but with real Politician’s names re-arranged.

    ( i.e Click Negg. Cavid Dameron, Bed Alls etc )

  • Squellett#

    Squellett wrote February 11, 2014 9:37:05 PM CET

    You need to get together and support my alternative voting system; which is called 'Deductible Voting' which is the power to take back your vote when your politician does something you dont like !
    Look for it on AVAAZ and Care2petition.com and other websites.
    I was looking at the HM Gov ePetition website and noted that what this was, was essentially a Barometer of Public Feelings and Opinion.

    With that idea in mind I decided to try and see if I could work this out as an Actual System of Voting in Real Time.

    I considered, that over a period of, at the end of say; one month, every month ,’a Politician who had already been Elected ;would be re-subjected to not just peoples voting intentions but their ACTUAL ADJUSTED or Non-Adjusted Vote. This might simply be a deductible vote of up top three times per month.

    Why 3 times only? Because for reasonable counting and logging adjustment purposes, and some degree of stability, there needs to be a limitation.

    The idea here is to give the voting public real-time control over their Politicians, on a real time every day basis!

    IN FACT, The Voting Public could recast their votes over the original votes or deduct them accordingly at any time of their choosing up to the last day of the month. On that last day the votes would be recounted and compared to what they were before, and added or deducted from the next candidate in line.

    If the new votes cast were such that the one who had taken the seat before now became a loser rather than a winner; then the one with the most votes would be reinstated into the previous winners place in office.
    One month’s notice would be given to the sitting MP and during that time no ‘New’ powers or policies could be pursued at that time.

    If no major adjustment of places took place during the voting month; then the respective parties would simply take their places based upon their votes now cast.

    This Real-Time Voting measure would give direct control back to the voting populace. It would be as if they were the bosses giving jobs to those who they chose based upon their performance and their original intentions.

    The Politicians would then, either need to readjust their voting intentions in Parliament, or be sacked by the electorate who may have adjusted their last vote cast so as to reflect their new opinion and Parliamentary Member.

    People who have died would still be counted for that month only but those people eligible to vote now would be allowed a vote straight away.
    This voting ability could be proven by a Registered ‘Token’ CARD. or Image and Number of the Voters choosing so that he / she had immediate copyright, and thus could not be duplicated because no-one but them would know the number or image. They would simply be sealed and registered against the Politicians name.

    You could for example write; ‘ I am voting for; ‘’’’’’’’’’’ as of date ‘’’’’’’’and provide your own photo on the same paper with your thumbprint and signature, OR an encrypted Code that only you possess.
    When you take back your vote; you simply request it back either by computer or by letter.

    What’s the point I hear you say ; and would it be practical?
    The point is that today we have no control over our Politicians once they get elected. I want to make them continually responsible, answerable and accountable, just as any employed person would be working for an employer.
    The practicality of it is indeed possible. It just needs some tweaking.
    The politicians would hate it of course and would do their best to stop it before it started but if you were to have Barometrical Political Candidates at Voting time with that Voting Agenda as their main party Policy it might stand a chance.
    I admit the idea is radical and many voters would n’t like it to begin with but the Government do n’t ask us when they change voting boundaries nor with ballot voting changes with 1st, 2nd, 3rd Party Preferences do they?
    You could limit voters changes to about 3 times in a month if you wished; just to obtain some settlements.
    This idea could be tested online with a game but with real Politician’s names re-arranged.

    ( i.e Click Negg. Cavid Dameron, Bed Alls etc )

  • Squellett#

    Squellett wrote February 11, 2014 9:37:03 PM CET

    You need to get together and support my alternative voting system; which is called 'Deductible Voting' which is the power to take back your vote when your politician does something you dont like !
    Look for it on AVAAZ and Care2petition.com and other websites.
    I was looking at the HM Gov ePetition website and noted that what this was, was essentially a Barometer of Public Feelings and Opinion.

    With that idea in mind I decided to try and see if I could work this out as an Actual System of Voting in Real Time.

    I considered, that over a period of, at the end of say; one month, every month ,’a Politician who had already been Elected ;would be re-subjected to not just peoples voting intentions but their ACTUAL ADJUSTED or Non-Adjusted Vote. This might simply be a deductible vote of up top three times per month.

    Why 3 times only? Because for reasonable counting and logging adjustment purposes, and some degree of stability, there needs to be a limitation.

    The idea here is to give the voting public real-time control over their Politicians, on a real time every day basis!

    IN FACT, The Voting Public could recast their votes over the original votes or deduct them accordingly at any time of their choosing up to the last day of the month. On that last day the votes would be recounted and compared to what they were before, and added or deducted from the next candidate in line.

    If the new votes cast were such that the one who had taken the seat before now became a loser rather than a winner; then the one with the most votes would be reinstated into the previous winners place in office.
    One month’s notice would be given to the sitting MP and during that time no ‘New’ powers or policies could be pursued at that time.

    If no major adjustment of places took place during the voting month; then the respective parties would simply take their places based upon their votes now cast.

    This Real-Time Voting measure would give direct control back to the voting populace. It would be as if they were the bosses giving jobs to those who they chose based upon their performance and their original intentions.

    The Politicians would then, either need to readjust their voting intentions in Parliament, or be sacked by the electorate who may have adjusted their last vote cast so as to reflect their new opinion and Parliamentary Member.

    People who have died would still be counted for that month only but those people eligible to vote now would be allowed a vote straight away.
    This voting ability could be proven by a Registered ‘Token’ CARD. or Image and Number of the Voters choosing so that he / she had immediate copyright, and thus could not be duplicated because no-one but them would know the number or image. They would simply be sealed and registered against the Politicians name.

    You could for example write; ‘ I am voting for; ‘’’’’’’’’’’ as of date ‘’’’’’’’and provide your own photo on the same paper with your thumbprint and signature, OR an encrypted Code that only you possess.
    When you take back your vote; you simply request it back either by computer or by letter.

    What’s the point I hear you say ; and would it be practical?
    The point is that today we have no control over our Politicians once they get elected. I want to make them continually responsible, answerable and accountable, just as any employed person would be working for an employer.
    The practicality of it is indeed possible. It just needs some tweaking.
    The politicians would hate it of course and would do their best to stop it before it started but if you were to have Barometrical Political Candidates at Voting time with that Voting Agenda as their main party Policy it might stand a chance.
    I admit the idea is radical and many voters would n’t like it to begin with but the Government do n’t ask us when they change voting boundaries nor with ballot voting changes with 1st, 2nd, 3rd Party Preferences do they?
    You could limit voters changes to about 3 times in a month if you wished; just to obtain some settlements.
    This idea could be tested online with a game but with real Politician’s names re-arranged.

    ( i.e Click Negg. Cavid Dameron, Bed Alls etc )

  • Squellett#

    Squellett wrote February 11, 2014 9:37:02 PM CET

    You need to get together and support my alternative voting system; which is called 'Deductible Voting' which is the power to take back your vote when your politician does something you dont like !
    Look for it on AVAAZ and Care2petition.com and other websites.
    I was looking at the HM Gov ePetition website and noted that what this was, was essentially a Barometer of Public Feelings and Opinion.

    With that idea in mind I decided to try and see if I could work this out as an Actual System of Voting in Real Time.

    I considered, that over a period of, at the end of say; one month, every month ,’a Politician who had already been Elected ;would be re-subjected to not just peoples voting intentions but their ACTUAL ADJUSTED or Non-Adjusted Vote. This might simply be a deductible vote of up top three times per month.

    Why 3 times only? Because for reasonable counting and logging adjustment purposes, and some degree of stability, there needs to be a limitation.

    The idea here is to give the voting public real-time control over their Politicians, on a real time every day basis!

    IN FACT, The Voting Public could recast their votes over the original votes or deduct them accordingly at any time of their choosing up to the last day of the month. On that last day the votes would be recounted and compared to what they were before, and added or deducted from the next candidate in line.

    If the new votes cast were such that the one who had taken the seat before now became a loser rather than a winner; then the one with the most votes would be reinstated into the previous winners place in office.
    One month’s notice would be given to the sitting MP and during that time no ‘New’ powers or policies could be pursued at that time.

    If no major adjustment of places took place during the voting month; then the respective parties would simply take their places based upon their votes now cast.

    This Real-Time Voting measure would give direct control back to the voting populace. It would be as if they were the bosses giving jobs to those who they chose based upon their performance and their original intentions.

    The Politicians would then, either need to readjust their voting intentions in Parliament, or be sacked by the electorate who may have adjusted their last vote cast so as to reflect their new opinion and Parliamentary Member.

    People who have died would still be counted for that month only but those people eligible to vote now would be allowed a vote straight away.
    This voting ability could be proven by a Registered ‘Token’ CARD. or Image and Number of the Voters choosing so that he / she had immediate copyright, and thus could not be duplicated because no-one but them would know the number or image. They would simply be sealed and registered against the Politicians name.

    You could for example write; ‘ I am voting for; ‘’’’’’’’’’’ as of date ‘’’’’’’’and provide your own photo on the same paper with your thumbprint and signature, OR an encrypted Code that only you possess.
    When you take back your vote; you simply request it back either by computer or by letter.

    What’s the point I hear you say ; and would it be practical?
    The point is that today we have no control over our Politicians once they get elected. I want to make them continually responsible, answerable and accountable, just as any employed person would be working for an employer.
    The practicality of it is indeed possible. It just needs some tweaking.
    The politicians would hate it of course and would do their best to stop it before it started but if you were to have Barometrical Political Candidates at Voting time with that Voting Agenda as their main party Policy it might stand a chance.
    I admit the idea is radical and many voters would n’t like it to begin with but the Government do n’t ask us when they change voting boundaries nor with ballot voting changes with 1st, 2nd, 3rd Party Preferences do they?
    You could limit voters changes to about 3 times in a month if you wished; just to obtain some settlements.
    This idea could be tested online with a game but with real Politician’s names re-arranged.

    ( i.e Click Negg. Cavid Dameron, Bed Alls etc )

  • Squellett#

    Squellett wrote February 11, 2014 9:37:01 PM CET

    You need to get together and support my alternative voting system; which is called 'Deductible Voting' which is the power to take back your vote when your politician does something you dont like !
    Look for it on AVAAZ and Care2petition.com and other websites.
    I was looking at the HM Gov ePetition website and noted that what this was, was essentially a Barometer of Public Feelings and Opinion.

    With that idea in mind I decided to try and see if I could work this out as an Actual System of Voting in Real Time.

    I considered, that over a period of, at the end of say; one month, every month ,’a Politician who had already been Elected ;would be re-subjected to not just peoples voting intentions but their ACTUAL ADJUSTED or Non-Adjusted Vote. This might simply be a deductible vote of up top three times per month.

    Why 3 times only? Because for reasonable counting and logging adjustment purposes, and some degree of stability, there needs to be a limitation.

    The idea here is to give the voting public real-time control over their Politicians, on a real time every day basis!

    IN FACT, The Voting Public could recast their votes over the original votes or deduct them accordingly at any time of their choosing up to the last day of the month. On that last day the votes would be recounted and compared to what they were before, and added or deducted from the next candidate in line.

    If the new votes cast were such that the one who had taken the seat before now became a loser rather than a winner; then the one with the most votes would be reinstated into the previous winners place in office.
    One month’s notice would be given to the sitting MP and during that time no ‘New’ powers or policies could be pursued at that time.

    If no major adjustment of places took place during the voting month; then the respective parties would simply take their places based upon their votes now cast.

    This Real-Time Voting measure would give direct control back to the voting populace. It would be as if they were the bosses giving jobs to those who they chose based upon their performance and their original intentions.

    The Politicians would then, either need to readjust their voting intentions in Parliament, or be sacked by the electorate who may have adjusted their last vote cast so as to reflect their new opinion and Parliamentary Member.

    People who have died would still be counted for that month only but those people eligible to vote now would be allowed a vote straight away.
    This voting ability could be proven by a Registered ‘Token’ CARD. or Image and Number of the Voters choosing so that he / she had immediate copyright, and thus could not be duplicated because no-one but them would know the number or image. They would simply be sealed and registered against the Politicians name.

    You could for example write; ‘ I am voting for; ‘’’’’’’’’’’ as of date ‘’’’’’’’and provide your own photo on the same paper with your thumbprint and signature, OR an encrypted Code that only you possess.
    When you take back your vote; you simply request it back either by computer or by letter.

    What’s the point I hear you say ; and would it be practical?
    The point is that today we have no control over our Politicians once they get elected. I want to make them continually responsible, answerable and accountable, just as any employed person would be working for an employer.
    The practicality of it is indeed possible. It just needs some tweaking.
    The politicians would hate it of course and would do their best to stop it before it started but if you were to have Barometrical Political Candidates at Voting time with that Voting Agenda as their main party Policy it might stand a chance.
    I admit the idea is radical and many voters would n’t like it to begin with but the Government do n’t ask us when they change voting boundaries nor with ballot voting changes with 1st, 2nd, 3rd Party Preferences do they?
    You could limit voters changes to about 3 times in a month if you wished; just to obtain some settlements.
    This idea could be tested online with a game but with real Politician’s names re-arranged.

    ( i.e Click Negg. Cavid Dameron, Bed Alls etc )

 
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook