More Proof Covid19 is a Synthetic Laboratory Creation

A Chinese scientist, now living in exile in the U.S., provides the greatest evidence yet that Sars-coV-2 is a modified bat virus created in a lab. Chinese Virologist Dr. Li-Meng Yan was initially called upon to study the outbreak from Hong Kong in December 2019. She was quickly sidelined and censored by the Chinese government, some of her papers being forcefully retracted. She then snuck out of Hong Kong for the U.S. stating she knew that the Chinese government and the World Health Organization were conspiring to cover up the data that showed Sars-coV-2 was more infectious than they were admitting to.

the WHO issued a statement on the matter,

“According to Chinese authorities, the virus in question can cause severe illness in some patients and does not transmit readily between people… There is limited information to determine the overall risk of this reported cluster.”

In a paper titled, “Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route”, Dr. Yan and two other authors published their finding that the virus’ genomic traits are not from a natural source but rather from one that is lab-created and synthetic. In plain speak, that means that the virus could not have naturally mutated but rather came from a lab-setting in which it was created.

From the Report:

“In this report, we describe the genomic, structural, medical, and literature evidence, which, when considered together, strongly contradicts the natural origin theory. The evidence shows that SARS-CoV-2 should be a laboratory product created by using bat coronaviruses ZC45 and/or ZXC21 as a template and/or backbone. Building upon the evidence, we further postulate a synthetic route for SARS-CoV-2, demonstrating that the laboratory-creation of this coronavirus is convenient and can be accomplished in approximately six months.”

“The genomic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 is suspiciously similar to that of a bat coronavirus discovered by military laboratories in the Third Military Medical University (Chongqing, China)and the Research Institute for Medicine of Nanjing Command (Nanjing, China).”

Well, looks like we were right yet again. I said this was a lab created virus all the way back in February. And for the record, I'd just like to remind you:

How we know the COVID-19 coronavirus wasn't made in a lab

COVID-19 not man-made, comparative genomic study finds

The coronavirus was not engineered in a lab. Here's how we know.

Fact-Check: No, the Novel Coronavirus Was Not 'Man-Made'

Etc. etc. etc. basically, the disinformation goes on for pages and pages. And this all the way back in March and April long before all of the data was in. So what was the purpose of "debunking" the idea of the virus not being 100% natural?

Again from the paper:

“It also argues for a critical look into certain recently published data, which, albeit problematic, was used to support and claim a natural origin of SARS-CoV-2. From a public health perspective, these actions are necessary as knowledge of the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and of how the virus entered the human population are of pivotal importance in the fundamental control of the COVID-19 pandemic as well as in preventing similar, future pandemics.”


Reply as guest, log in or create an account