UK junior lawyers say difficult exams are 'discriminatory'

A petition signed by over 650 trainee lawyers demands changes to the Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE), labeling it “discriminatory” and a barrier to diversity in the legal profession. The petitioners argue that the exam’s difficulty disproportionately affects candidates from ethnic minority and working-class backgrounds, citing Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) data showing stark pass rate disparities. In January, 70% of white candidates passed the SQE, compared to 49% of Asian and 37% of black candidates.

Women and working-class candidates also fare worse than their peers.The petition highlights the exam’s toll, with trainee solicitor Hannah Cox stating, “Despite being academically very strong, with a law degree from a top university and a training contract with an international firm, I have found the SQE disproportionately challenging.” She notes its severe impact on her mental, financial, and physical well-being, a sentiment shared by many candidates.Introduced in 2021 to replace the Legal Practice Course, the SQE involves multiple-choice tests on topics like criminal law and oral advocacy exams.

Critics argue its 56% pass rate in January reflects excessive difficulty. Failing candidates risk losing training contracts and repaying qualification costs. The SRA acknowledges “teething problems” and is investigating the pass rate gaps.